Table 2

The comparison of prediction performance between LR, SVM (linear kernel and RBF kernel), BP neural network, and Siamese-KNN

Methods
MetricLRSVM (linear)SVM (RBF)BPNNSiamese-KNN
LOOCV accuracy64.86%64.86%67.56%72.79%83.78%
Sensitivity57.89%57.89%63.16%68.42%84.21%
Specificity72.22%72.22%72.22%77.78%83.33%
AUC0.730.720.680.770.84
McNemar’s test (P)0.0160.0390.0310.125
Methods
MetricLRSVM (linear)SVM (RBF)BPNNSiamese-KNN
LOOCV accuracy64.86%64.86%67.56%72.79%83.78%
Sensitivity57.89%57.89%63.16%68.42%84.21%
Specificity72.22%72.22%72.22%77.78%83.33%
AUC0.730.720.680.770.84
McNemar’s test (P)0.0160.0390.0310.125

Note: Abbreviations: LR, logistic regression; SVM, support vector machine; RBF, radial basis function; BPNN, back-propagation neural network; KNN, K-nearest neighbor; LOOCV, leave-one-out cross-validation; AUC, area under the curve.

Table 2

The comparison of prediction performance between LR, SVM (linear kernel and RBF kernel), BP neural network, and Siamese-KNN

Methods
MetricLRSVM (linear)SVM (RBF)BPNNSiamese-KNN
LOOCV accuracy64.86%64.86%67.56%72.79%83.78%
Sensitivity57.89%57.89%63.16%68.42%84.21%
Specificity72.22%72.22%72.22%77.78%83.33%
AUC0.730.720.680.770.84
McNemar’s test (P)0.0160.0390.0310.125
Methods
MetricLRSVM (linear)SVM (RBF)BPNNSiamese-KNN
LOOCV accuracy64.86%64.86%67.56%72.79%83.78%
Sensitivity57.89%57.89%63.16%68.42%84.21%
Specificity72.22%72.22%72.22%77.78%83.33%
AUC0.730.720.680.770.84
McNemar’s test (P)0.0160.0390.0310.125

Note: Abbreviations: LR, logistic regression; SVM, support vector machine; RBF, radial basis function; BPNN, back-propagation neural network; KNN, K-nearest neighbor; LOOCV, leave-one-out cross-validation; AUC, area under the curve.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close