Table C1

Results and summary tables for the Bunch study, with only independent pairwise comparisons included. 95% bootstrap intervals are provided for quantities estimated via simulation. To allocate the inconclusives and eliminations, we used the rule stated in Bunch and Murphy (2003): FBI examiners can exclude only on class characteristic mismatches. It should be noted that in none of the 287 536 simulations which matched the other set criteria did we find a set which had more than 109 class characteristic mismatches, suggesting that there may have been some eliminations made on individual characteristics, but as this cannot be confirmed, estimates of eliminations only include class characteristic mismatches

A comprehensive validity study for the forensic examination of cartridge cases Bunch and Murphy (2003)
Study typeTest set
Participants
# Knowns# Unknowns
Open setvariablevariable8 FBI examiners

Independent comparisons

Mean (95% CI)
IdentificationInconclusiveEliminationSource Total
Same source28.7 [26, 31]0028.7 [26, 31]
Diff source0156.5 [134, 181]42.5 [22, 64]199.1 [184, 217]
Conclusion Total28.7 [26, 31]156.5 [134, 181]42.5 [22, 64]

Independent comparisons: conclusion-specific probabilities

IdentificationInconclusiveEliminationSource Probability
Same source1.0000.0000.0000.126 [0.110, 0.142]
Diff source0.0001.0001.0000.874 [0.858, 0.890]
Conclusion probability0.126 [0.110, 0.142]0.687 [0.597, 0.779]0.187 [0.095, 0.278]

Independent comparisons: source-specific probabilities

IdentificationInconclusiveEliminationSource probability
Same source1.0000.0000.0000.126 [0.110, 0.142]
Diff source0.0000.787 [0.682, 0.891]0.214 [0.109, 0.318]0.874 [0.858, 0.890]
Conclusion probability0.126 [0.110, 0.142]0.687 [0.597, 0.779]0.187 [0.095, 0.278]

Independent comparisons: error rates

Opt.MeaningMissed identificationMissed eliminationTotal
2FTE error0.0000.0000.000
3Process error0.0000.787 [0.682, 0.891]0.687 [0.587, 0.779]
A comprehensive validity study for the forensic examination of cartridge cases Bunch and Murphy (2003)
Study typeTest set
Participants
# Knowns# Unknowns
Open setvariablevariable8 FBI examiners

Independent comparisons

Mean (95% CI)
IdentificationInconclusiveEliminationSource Total
Same source28.7 [26, 31]0028.7 [26, 31]
Diff source0156.5 [134, 181]42.5 [22, 64]199.1 [184, 217]
Conclusion Total28.7 [26, 31]156.5 [134, 181]42.5 [22, 64]

Independent comparisons: conclusion-specific probabilities

IdentificationInconclusiveEliminationSource Probability
Same source1.0000.0000.0000.126 [0.110, 0.142]
Diff source0.0001.0001.0000.874 [0.858, 0.890]
Conclusion probability0.126 [0.110, 0.142]0.687 [0.597, 0.779]0.187 [0.095, 0.278]

Independent comparisons: source-specific probabilities

IdentificationInconclusiveEliminationSource probability
Same source1.0000.0000.0000.126 [0.110, 0.142]
Diff source0.0000.787 [0.682, 0.891]0.214 [0.109, 0.318]0.874 [0.858, 0.890]
Conclusion probability0.126 [0.110, 0.142]0.687 [0.597, 0.779]0.187 [0.095, 0.278]

Independent comparisons: error rates

Opt.MeaningMissed identificationMissed eliminationTotal
2FTE error0.0000.0000.000
3Process error0.0000.787 [0.682, 0.891]0.687 [0.587, 0.779]
Table C1

Results and summary tables for the Bunch study, with only independent pairwise comparisons included. 95% bootstrap intervals are provided for quantities estimated via simulation. To allocate the inconclusives and eliminations, we used the rule stated in Bunch and Murphy (2003): FBI examiners can exclude only on class characteristic mismatches. It should be noted that in none of the 287 536 simulations which matched the other set criteria did we find a set which had more than 109 class characteristic mismatches, suggesting that there may have been some eliminations made on individual characteristics, but as this cannot be confirmed, estimates of eliminations only include class characteristic mismatches

A comprehensive validity study for the forensic examination of cartridge cases Bunch and Murphy (2003)
Study typeTest set
Participants
# Knowns# Unknowns
Open setvariablevariable8 FBI examiners

Independent comparisons

Mean (95% CI)
IdentificationInconclusiveEliminationSource Total
Same source28.7 [26, 31]0028.7 [26, 31]
Diff source0156.5 [134, 181]42.5 [22, 64]199.1 [184, 217]
Conclusion Total28.7 [26, 31]156.5 [134, 181]42.5 [22, 64]

Independent comparisons: conclusion-specific probabilities

IdentificationInconclusiveEliminationSource Probability
Same source1.0000.0000.0000.126 [0.110, 0.142]
Diff source0.0001.0001.0000.874 [0.858, 0.890]
Conclusion probability0.126 [0.110, 0.142]0.687 [0.597, 0.779]0.187 [0.095, 0.278]

Independent comparisons: source-specific probabilities

IdentificationInconclusiveEliminationSource probability
Same source1.0000.0000.0000.126 [0.110, 0.142]
Diff source0.0000.787 [0.682, 0.891]0.214 [0.109, 0.318]0.874 [0.858, 0.890]
Conclusion probability0.126 [0.110, 0.142]0.687 [0.597, 0.779]0.187 [0.095, 0.278]

Independent comparisons: error rates

Opt.MeaningMissed identificationMissed eliminationTotal
2FTE error0.0000.0000.000
3Process error0.0000.787 [0.682, 0.891]0.687 [0.587, 0.779]
A comprehensive validity study for the forensic examination of cartridge cases Bunch and Murphy (2003)
Study typeTest set
Participants
# Knowns# Unknowns
Open setvariablevariable8 FBI examiners

Independent comparisons

Mean (95% CI)
IdentificationInconclusiveEliminationSource Total
Same source28.7 [26, 31]0028.7 [26, 31]
Diff source0156.5 [134, 181]42.5 [22, 64]199.1 [184, 217]
Conclusion Total28.7 [26, 31]156.5 [134, 181]42.5 [22, 64]

Independent comparisons: conclusion-specific probabilities

IdentificationInconclusiveEliminationSource Probability
Same source1.0000.0000.0000.126 [0.110, 0.142]
Diff source0.0001.0001.0000.874 [0.858, 0.890]
Conclusion probability0.126 [0.110, 0.142]0.687 [0.597, 0.779]0.187 [0.095, 0.278]

Independent comparisons: source-specific probabilities

IdentificationInconclusiveEliminationSource probability
Same source1.0000.0000.0000.126 [0.110, 0.142]
Diff source0.0000.787 [0.682, 0.891]0.214 [0.109, 0.318]0.874 [0.858, 0.890]
Conclusion probability0.126 [0.110, 0.142]0.687 [0.597, 0.779]0.187 [0.095, 0.278]

Independent comparisons: error rates

Opt.MeaningMissed identificationMissed eliminationTotal
2FTE error0.0000.0000.000
3Process error0.0000.787 [0.682, 0.891]0.687 [0.587, 0.779]
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close