Table 2.

Valve implant sizes and patient–prosthesis mismatch

VariableStudy population (N = 1126)
Valve size (mm)
1917 (1.5)
21122 (11.0)
23331 (29.8)
25362 (32.6)
27227 (20.4)
2953 (4.8)
Estimated PPM at implant
0.75-0.8512 (1.4)
0.65-0.752 (0.2)
<0.650 (0.0)
VariableStudy population (N = 1126)
Valve size (mm)
1917 (1.5)
21122 (11.0)
23331 (29.8)
25362 (32.6)
27227 (20.4)
2953 (4.8)
Estimated PPM at implant
0.75-0.8512 (1.4)
0.65-0.752 (0.2)
<0.650 (0.0)

PPM: patient–prosthesis mismatch.

Categorical variables are presented as number (%).

Table 2.

Valve implant sizes and patient–prosthesis mismatch

VariableStudy population (N = 1126)
Valve size (mm)
1917 (1.5)
21122 (11.0)
23331 (29.8)
25362 (32.6)
27227 (20.4)
2953 (4.8)
Estimated PPM at implant
0.75-0.8512 (1.4)
0.65-0.752 (0.2)
<0.650 (0.0)
VariableStudy population (N = 1126)
Valve size (mm)
1917 (1.5)
21122 (11.0)
23331 (29.8)
25362 (32.6)
27227 (20.4)
2953 (4.8)
Estimated PPM at implant
0.75-0.8512 (1.4)
0.65-0.752 (0.2)
<0.650 (0.0)

PPM: patient–prosthesis mismatch.

Categorical variables are presented as number (%).

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close