Table 4

Comparison of different methods based on AUC and AUPR with the paired Wilcoxon test

p-value between VADLP and another methodCNNLDAPing’s methodSIMCLDALDAPMFLDASelMFDF
p-value of AUC1.5281e-052.3362e-051.0745e-063.2352e-053.1702e-073.26384e-05
p-value of AUPR1.1348e-050.00023.0745e-076.3247e-061.5643e-065.63271e-05
p-value between VADLP and another methodCNNLDAPing’s methodSIMCLDALDAPMFLDASelMFDF
p-value of AUC1.5281e-052.3362e-051.0745e-063.2352e-053.1702e-073.26384e-05
p-value of AUPR1.1348e-050.00023.0745e-076.3247e-061.5643e-065.63271e-05
Table 4

Comparison of different methods based on AUC and AUPR with the paired Wilcoxon test

p-value between VADLP and another methodCNNLDAPing’s methodSIMCLDALDAPMFLDASelMFDF
p-value of AUC1.5281e-052.3362e-051.0745e-063.2352e-053.1702e-073.26384e-05
p-value of AUPR1.1348e-050.00023.0745e-076.3247e-061.5643e-065.63271e-05
p-value between VADLP and another methodCNNLDAPing’s methodSIMCLDALDAPMFLDASelMFDF
p-value of AUC1.5281e-052.3362e-051.0745e-063.2352e-053.1702e-073.26384e-05
p-value of AUPR1.1348e-050.00023.0745e-076.3247e-061.5643e-065.63271e-05
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close