Performance comparison of DeepVF and existing toolkits for predicting VFs on the independent test
Methods . | SN . | SP . | ACC . | F-value . | MCC . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VirulentPred | 0.641 | 0.573 | 0.607 | 0.620 | 0.214 |
MP3 | 0.536 | 0.783 | 0.66 | 0.612 | 0.33 |
PBVF | 0.774 | 0.814 | 0.794 | 0.790 | 0.589 |
DeepVF | 0.790 | 0.833 | 0.812 | 0.807 | 0.624 |
BLAST | 0.682 | 0.818 | 0.750 | 0.732 | 0.505 |
Methods . | SN . | SP . | ACC . | F-value . | MCC . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VirulentPred | 0.641 | 0.573 | 0.607 | 0.620 | 0.214 |
MP3 | 0.536 | 0.783 | 0.66 | 0.612 | 0.33 |
PBVF | 0.774 | 0.814 | 0.794 | 0.790 | 0.589 |
DeepVF | 0.790 | 0.833 | 0.812 | 0.807 | 0.624 |
BLAST | 0.682 | 0.818 | 0.750 | 0.732 | 0.505 |
Note: The best performance value for each metric across different toolkits is highlighted in bold.
Performance comparison of DeepVF and existing toolkits for predicting VFs on the independent test
Methods . | SN . | SP . | ACC . | F-value . | MCC . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VirulentPred | 0.641 | 0.573 | 0.607 | 0.620 | 0.214 |
MP3 | 0.536 | 0.783 | 0.66 | 0.612 | 0.33 |
PBVF | 0.774 | 0.814 | 0.794 | 0.790 | 0.589 |
DeepVF | 0.790 | 0.833 | 0.812 | 0.807 | 0.624 |
BLAST | 0.682 | 0.818 | 0.750 | 0.732 | 0.505 |
Methods . | SN . | SP . | ACC . | F-value . | MCC . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VirulentPred | 0.641 | 0.573 | 0.607 | 0.620 | 0.214 |
MP3 | 0.536 | 0.783 | 0.66 | 0.612 | 0.33 |
PBVF | 0.774 | 0.814 | 0.794 | 0.790 | 0.589 |
DeepVF | 0.790 | 0.833 | 0.812 | 0.807 | 0.624 |
BLAST | 0.682 | 0.818 | 0.750 | 0.732 | 0.505 |
Note: The best performance value for each metric across different toolkits is highlighted in bold.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.