Table 2

Performance of the ProtFold-DFG predictors with and without the transitive closure on the LINDAHL data set evaluated by using 2-fold cross-validation

MethodAccuracy (%)
ProtFold-DFGa54.20
ProtFold-DFGb81.93
MethodAccuracy (%)
ProtFold-DFGa54.20
ProtFold-DFGb81.93

aDFG |$\overline{\mathbf{\mathcal{F}}}$| without transitive closure [26].

bDFG |$\overline{\mathbf{\mathcal{F}}}$| with transitive closure [26].

Table 2

Performance of the ProtFold-DFG predictors with and without the transitive closure on the LINDAHL data set evaluated by using 2-fold cross-validation

MethodAccuracy (%)
ProtFold-DFGa54.20
ProtFold-DFGb81.93
MethodAccuracy (%)
ProtFold-DFGa54.20
ProtFold-DFGb81.93

aDFG |$\overline{\mathbf{\mathcal{F}}}$| without transitive closure [26].

bDFG |$\overline{\mathbf{\mathcal{F}}}$| with transitive closure [26].

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close