| Case . | Methods for calculating the CR . | Departure point . | Waypoint . | Arrival point . | Maximum CR . | Sailing distance (km) . |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case 1 | Mou et al. (2010) | (128.74N, 34.01E) | – | (128.49N, 33.65E) | 0.65 (+0.0%) (normalized) | 40.1 (+0.0%) |
| Case 2 | Kearon (1977) | 0.93 (+43.0%) (normalized) | 39.8 (−0.7%) | |||
| Case 3 | This study | 0.48 (−26.2%) | 38.1 (−5.0%) |
| Case . | Methods for calculating the CR . | Departure point . | Waypoint . | Arrival point . | Maximum CR . | Sailing distance (km) . |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case 1 | Mou et al. (2010) | (128.74N, 34.01E) | – | (128.49N, 33.65E) | 0.65 (+0.0%) (normalized) | 40.1 (+0.0%) |
| Case 2 | Kearon (1977) | 0.93 (+43.0%) (normalized) | 39.8 (−0.7%) | |||
| Case 3 | This study | 0.48 (−26.2%) | 38.1 (−5.0%) |
| Case . | Methods for calculating the CR . | Departure point . | Waypoint . | Arrival point . | Maximum CR . | Sailing distance (km) . |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case 1 | Mou et al. (2010) | (128.74N, 34.01E) | – | (128.49N, 33.65E) | 0.65 (+0.0%) (normalized) | 40.1 (+0.0%) |
| Case 2 | Kearon (1977) | 0.93 (+43.0%) (normalized) | 39.8 (−0.7%) | |||
| Case 3 | This study | 0.48 (−26.2%) | 38.1 (−5.0%) |
| Case . | Methods for calculating the CR . | Departure point . | Waypoint . | Arrival point . | Maximum CR . | Sailing distance (km) . |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case 1 | Mou et al. (2010) | (128.74N, 34.01E) | – | (128.49N, 33.65E) | 0.65 (+0.0%) (normalized) | 40.1 (+0.0%) |
| Case 2 | Kearon (1977) | 0.93 (+43.0%) (normalized) | 39.8 (−0.7%) | |||
| Case 3 | This study | 0.48 (−26.2%) | 38.1 (−5.0%) |
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.
