Table 1

Characteristics of measures used to assess life participation in patients on PD (n = 42)

MeasureResponse formatNumber of itemsRecallCostCompletion timeaSpecific to PD, KRT or CKDFrequency of use (number of studies)
SF-36 [16]Yes/no, 3‐/5‐/6‐point Likert scale36Current, past 4 weeksLicense fee upon request5–10 minNo122
KDQOL-SF [17]bYes/no, 3‐/5‐/6‐/10‐point Likert scale, open‐ended response80Current, past 4 weeksNo charge~16 minCKD86
EQ-5D [18]c‘Indicate which statements best describe…’, VAS16CurrentLicense fee upon request<5 minNo27
KDQOL-36 [19]Yes/no, 3‐/5‐/6‐point Likert scale36Current, past 4 weeksNo charge~10 minCKD26
SF-12 [20]Yes/no, 3‐/5‐/6‐point Likert scale12Current, past 4 weeksLicense fee upon request~2 minNo23
WHOQOL- BREF [21]5-point Likert scale26Current, past 2 weeksContact World Health Organization~5 minNo21
IIRS [22]7-point Likert scale13CurrentContact author<15 minNo6
NHP [23]Yes/no45CurrentContact Galen Research~9 minNo5
CHEQ [24]Yes/no, 3-/5-/6-/7-point Likert scale, open-ended responses83Current, past 4 weeksContact author~16 minKRT4
15D [25]5-point ordinal scale15CurrentNo charge~3 minNo3
IEQ [26]d7-point Likert scale20CurrentContact author~4 minNo3
SF-6D [27]4-/5-/6-point ordinal scale6CurrentNo charge for academic/noncommercial use with study registration. License fee for commercial use upon request.<2 minNo3
HAP [28]3‐point ordinal scale: ‘still doing, have stopped doing, never did’102CurrentContact author5–10 minNo3
GHQ-28 [29]4-point Likert scale28Past few weeks5.50 AUD~5 minNo2
PAQOL [30]dOpen-ended responses, 10-point Likert scale19CurrentContact author~4 minNo2
SIP [31]‘Check those that apply’136CurrentContact the Medical Outcomes Trust20–30 minNo2
SWED-Qual [32]4-/5-/6-point Likert scale61Current, past weekContact author~12 minNo2
FACIT-Fatigue [33]5-point Likert scale13Past 7 daysNo charge with study registration5–10 minNo2
QLQ-C30 [34]4-/7-point Likert scale30Current, past week

No charge for academic/noncommercial use with study registration.

License fee for commercial use upon request.

~6 minNo2
RQLPd5-point Likert scale43CurrentContact author5–7 minCKD1
PASE [35]4-point Likert scale, open-ended responses, number of hours, yes/no, ‘which of the following categories best describes…’10Past 7 daysContact New England Research Institutes5–15 minNo1
WPAI-GH [36]Yes/no, number of hours, 11-point Likert scale6Current, past 7 daysContact author<2 minNo1
KDQ [37]d7-point Likert scale26Past 2 weeksContact author10–15 minCKD1
GHQ-12 [29]4-point Likert scale12Past 4 weeks2.25 AUD~2 minNo1
DUKE [38]3-point Likert scale, number of days17Current, past weekContact author~3 minNo1
HMQ [39]Yes/no, 3-/4-/6-point ordinal scale, VAS, open-ended responses37Current, past 2 weeksContact author<10 minNo1
WHODAS II [40]5‐point Likert scale, number of days15Past 30 daysLicense fee upon request~5 minNo1
IPAQ [41]Yes/no, time spent on activities27Past 7 daysNo charge~5 minNo1
ICECAP-O [42]4-point Likert scale5CurrentNo charge with study registration~1 minNo1
MHIQ [43]dYes/no, 3-/5-point Likert scale59CurrentContact author~20 minNo1
PGWB [44]6‐point Likert scale22Past monthContact author<5 minNo1
DRM [45]4-/5-/7-point Likert scale, percentage of time, open-ended responses, yes/no, ;check all that apply;≥110Current, yesterdayContact author45–75 minNo1
9-THAI [46]5-point Likert scale9Past month, last yearContact author~2 minNo1
RAND-36 [47]Yes/no, 3‐/5‐/6‐point Likert scale36Current, past 4 weeksNo charge5–10 minNo1
Author-developed measures (for own study, not validated)
Dąbrowska- Bender et al. [48]d10-point Likert scaleNANAContact authorNAKRT1
Devins et al. [49]dYes/no, number of hours per week5Past 7 daysContact author<2 minCKD1
Fernandes da SilvadNANANAContact authorNAKRT1
Juergensen et al. [50]10-point Likert scale, open-ended responses20CurrentContact author10–15 minKRT1
Panagopouloud [51]NANANAContact authorNAKRT1
Szabod [52]NANANAContact authorNANA1
Tapsond [53]NANANAContact authorNAKRT1
Telld [54]Yes/no1NAContact author<1 minCKD1
MeasureResponse formatNumber of itemsRecallCostCompletion timeaSpecific to PD, KRT or CKDFrequency of use (number of studies)
SF-36 [16]Yes/no, 3‐/5‐/6‐point Likert scale36Current, past 4 weeksLicense fee upon request5–10 minNo122
KDQOL-SF [17]bYes/no, 3‐/5‐/6‐/10‐point Likert scale, open‐ended response80Current, past 4 weeksNo charge~16 minCKD86
EQ-5D [18]c‘Indicate which statements best describe…’, VAS16CurrentLicense fee upon request<5 minNo27
KDQOL-36 [19]Yes/no, 3‐/5‐/6‐point Likert scale36Current, past 4 weeksNo charge~10 minCKD26
SF-12 [20]Yes/no, 3‐/5‐/6‐point Likert scale12Current, past 4 weeksLicense fee upon request~2 minNo23
WHOQOL- BREF [21]5-point Likert scale26Current, past 2 weeksContact World Health Organization~5 minNo21
IIRS [22]7-point Likert scale13CurrentContact author<15 minNo6
NHP [23]Yes/no45CurrentContact Galen Research~9 minNo5
CHEQ [24]Yes/no, 3-/5-/6-/7-point Likert scale, open-ended responses83Current, past 4 weeksContact author~16 minKRT4
15D [25]5-point ordinal scale15CurrentNo charge~3 minNo3
IEQ [26]d7-point Likert scale20CurrentContact author~4 minNo3
SF-6D [27]4-/5-/6-point ordinal scale6CurrentNo charge for academic/noncommercial use with study registration. License fee for commercial use upon request.<2 minNo3
HAP [28]3‐point ordinal scale: ‘still doing, have stopped doing, never did’102CurrentContact author5–10 minNo3
GHQ-28 [29]4-point Likert scale28Past few weeks5.50 AUD~5 minNo2
PAQOL [30]dOpen-ended responses, 10-point Likert scale19CurrentContact author~4 minNo2
SIP [31]‘Check those that apply’136CurrentContact the Medical Outcomes Trust20–30 minNo2
SWED-Qual [32]4-/5-/6-point Likert scale61Current, past weekContact author~12 minNo2
FACIT-Fatigue [33]5-point Likert scale13Past 7 daysNo charge with study registration5–10 minNo2
QLQ-C30 [34]4-/7-point Likert scale30Current, past week

No charge for academic/noncommercial use with study registration.

License fee for commercial use upon request.

~6 minNo2
RQLPd5-point Likert scale43CurrentContact author5–7 minCKD1
PASE [35]4-point Likert scale, open-ended responses, number of hours, yes/no, ‘which of the following categories best describes…’10Past 7 daysContact New England Research Institutes5–15 minNo1
WPAI-GH [36]Yes/no, number of hours, 11-point Likert scale6Current, past 7 daysContact author<2 minNo1
KDQ [37]d7-point Likert scale26Past 2 weeksContact author10–15 minCKD1
GHQ-12 [29]4-point Likert scale12Past 4 weeks2.25 AUD~2 minNo1
DUKE [38]3-point Likert scale, number of days17Current, past weekContact author~3 minNo1
HMQ [39]Yes/no, 3-/4-/6-point ordinal scale, VAS, open-ended responses37Current, past 2 weeksContact author<10 minNo1
WHODAS II [40]5‐point Likert scale, number of days15Past 30 daysLicense fee upon request~5 minNo1
IPAQ [41]Yes/no, time spent on activities27Past 7 daysNo charge~5 minNo1
ICECAP-O [42]4-point Likert scale5CurrentNo charge with study registration~1 minNo1
MHIQ [43]dYes/no, 3-/5-point Likert scale59CurrentContact author~20 minNo1
PGWB [44]6‐point Likert scale22Past monthContact author<5 minNo1
DRM [45]4-/5-/7-point Likert scale, percentage of time, open-ended responses, yes/no, ;check all that apply;≥110Current, yesterdayContact author45–75 minNo1
9-THAI [46]5-point Likert scale9Past month, last yearContact author~2 minNo1
RAND-36 [47]Yes/no, 3‐/5‐/6‐point Likert scale36Current, past 4 weeksNo charge5–10 minNo1
Author-developed measures (for own study, not validated)
Dąbrowska- Bender et al. [48]d10-point Likert scaleNANAContact authorNAKRT1
Devins et al. [49]dYes/no, number of hours per week5Past 7 daysContact author<2 minCKD1
Fernandes da SilvadNANANAContact authorNAKRT1
Juergensen et al. [50]10-point Likert scale, open-ended responses20CurrentContact author10–15 minKRT1
Panagopouloud [51]NANANAContact authorNAKRT1
Szabod [52]NANANAContact authorNANA1
Tapsond [53]NANANAContact authorNAKRT1
Telld [54]Yes/no1NAContact author<1 minCKD1
a

Where data on completion time were unavailable, authors estimated based on ~12 s/item.

b

Studies used versions 1.1, 1.2 or 1.3.

c

Some studies used EQ-5D-5L and others used EQ-5D-3L.

d

Could not retrieve measure in full.

KRT: kidney replacement therapy; IIRS: Illness Intrusiveness Ratings Scale; NHP: Nottingham Health Profile; 15 D: 15 dimensions; IEQ: Illness Effects Questionnaire; GHQ-28: General Health Questionnaire 28-item; HAP: Human Activity Profile; PAQOL: patient-assessed quality of life; SIP: Sickness Impact Profile; RQLP: Renal Quality of Life Profile; PASE: Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly; WPAI-GH: Work Productivity and Activity Impairment General Health; KDQ: Kidney Disease Questionnaire; GHQ-12: 12-item General Health Questionnaire; DUKE: Duke Health Profile; HMQ: Health Measurement Questionnaire; WHODAS II: World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0; IPAQ: International Physical Activity Questionnaire; QLQ-C30: Quality of Life Questionnaire; MHIQ: McMaster Health Index Questionnaire; PGWB: Psychological General Well-Being Index; DRM: Day Reconstruction Method; FACIT: Fatigue, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy—fatigue scale; SWED-Qual: Swedish Health-Related Quality of Life Survey.

Table 1

Characteristics of measures used to assess life participation in patients on PD (n = 42)

MeasureResponse formatNumber of itemsRecallCostCompletion timeaSpecific to PD, KRT or CKDFrequency of use (number of studies)
SF-36 [16]Yes/no, 3‐/5‐/6‐point Likert scale36Current, past 4 weeksLicense fee upon request5–10 minNo122
KDQOL-SF [17]bYes/no, 3‐/5‐/6‐/10‐point Likert scale, open‐ended response80Current, past 4 weeksNo charge~16 minCKD86
EQ-5D [18]c‘Indicate which statements best describe…’, VAS16CurrentLicense fee upon request<5 minNo27
KDQOL-36 [19]Yes/no, 3‐/5‐/6‐point Likert scale36Current, past 4 weeksNo charge~10 minCKD26
SF-12 [20]Yes/no, 3‐/5‐/6‐point Likert scale12Current, past 4 weeksLicense fee upon request~2 minNo23
WHOQOL- BREF [21]5-point Likert scale26Current, past 2 weeksContact World Health Organization~5 minNo21
IIRS [22]7-point Likert scale13CurrentContact author<15 minNo6
NHP [23]Yes/no45CurrentContact Galen Research~9 minNo5
CHEQ [24]Yes/no, 3-/5-/6-/7-point Likert scale, open-ended responses83Current, past 4 weeksContact author~16 minKRT4
15D [25]5-point ordinal scale15CurrentNo charge~3 minNo3
IEQ [26]d7-point Likert scale20CurrentContact author~4 minNo3
SF-6D [27]4-/5-/6-point ordinal scale6CurrentNo charge for academic/noncommercial use with study registration. License fee for commercial use upon request.<2 minNo3
HAP [28]3‐point ordinal scale: ‘still doing, have stopped doing, never did’102CurrentContact author5–10 minNo3
GHQ-28 [29]4-point Likert scale28Past few weeks5.50 AUD~5 minNo2
PAQOL [30]dOpen-ended responses, 10-point Likert scale19CurrentContact author~4 minNo2
SIP [31]‘Check those that apply’136CurrentContact the Medical Outcomes Trust20–30 minNo2
SWED-Qual [32]4-/5-/6-point Likert scale61Current, past weekContact author~12 minNo2
FACIT-Fatigue [33]5-point Likert scale13Past 7 daysNo charge with study registration5–10 minNo2
QLQ-C30 [34]4-/7-point Likert scale30Current, past week

No charge for academic/noncommercial use with study registration.

License fee for commercial use upon request.

~6 minNo2
RQLPd5-point Likert scale43CurrentContact author5–7 minCKD1
PASE [35]4-point Likert scale, open-ended responses, number of hours, yes/no, ‘which of the following categories best describes…’10Past 7 daysContact New England Research Institutes5–15 minNo1
WPAI-GH [36]Yes/no, number of hours, 11-point Likert scale6Current, past 7 daysContact author<2 minNo1
KDQ [37]d7-point Likert scale26Past 2 weeksContact author10–15 minCKD1
GHQ-12 [29]4-point Likert scale12Past 4 weeks2.25 AUD~2 minNo1
DUKE [38]3-point Likert scale, number of days17Current, past weekContact author~3 minNo1
HMQ [39]Yes/no, 3-/4-/6-point ordinal scale, VAS, open-ended responses37Current, past 2 weeksContact author<10 minNo1
WHODAS II [40]5‐point Likert scale, number of days15Past 30 daysLicense fee upon request~5 minNo1
IPAQ [41]Yes/no, time spent on activities27Past 7 daysNo charge~5 minNo1
ICECAP-O [42]4-point Likert scale5CurrentNo charge with study registration~1 minNo1
MHIQ [43]dYes/no, 3-/5-point Likert scale59CurrentContact author~20 minNo1
PGWB [44]6‐point Likert scale22Past monthContact author<5 minNo1
DRM [45]4-/5-/7-point Likert scale, percentage of time, open-ended responses, yes/no, ;check all that apply;≥110Current, yesterdayContact author45–75 minNo1
9-THAI [46]5-point Likert scale9Past month, last yearContact author~2 minNo1
RAND-36 [47]Yes/no, 3‐/5‐/6‐point Likert scale36Current, past 4 weeksNo charge5–10 minNo1
Author-developed measures (for own study, not validated)
Dąbrowska- Bender et al. [48]d10-point Likert scaleNANAContact authorNAKRT1
Devins et al. [49]dYes/no, number of hours per week5Past 7 daysContact author<2 minCKD1
Fernandes da SilvadNANANAContact authorNAKRT1
Juergensen et al. [50]10-point Likert scale, open-ended responses20CurrentContact author10–15 minKRT1
Panagopouloud [51]NANANAContact authorNAKRT1
Szabod [52]NANANAContact authorNANA1
Tapsond [53]NANANAContact authorNAKRT1
Telld [54]Yes/no1NAContact author<1 minCKD1
MeasureResponse formatNumber of itemsRecallCostCompletion timeaSpecific to PD, KRT or CKDFrequency of use (number of studies)
SF-36 [16]Yes/no, 3‐/5‐/6‐point Likert scale36Current, past 4 weeksLicense fee upon request5–10 minNo122
KDQOL-SF [17]bYes/no, 3‐/5‐/6‐/10‐point Likert scale, open‐ended response80Current, past 4 weeksNo charge~16 minCKD86
EQ-5D [18]c‘Indicate which statements best describe…’, VAS16CurrentLicense fee upon request<5 minNo27
KDQOL-36 [19]Yes/no, 3‐/5‐/6‐point Likert scale36Current, past 4 weeksNo charge~10 minCKD26
SF-12 [20]Yes/no, 3‐/5‐/6‐point Likert scale12Current, past 4 weeksLicense fee upon request~2 minNo23
WHOQOL- BREF [21]5-point Likert scale26Current, past 2 weeksContact World Health Organization~5 minNo21
IIRS [22]7-point Likert scale13CurrentContact author<15 minNo6
NHP [23]Yes/no45CurrentContact Galen Research~9 minNo5
CHEQ [24]Yes/no, 3-/5-/6-/7-point Likert scale, open-ended responses83Current, past 4 weeksContact author~16 minKRT4
15D [25]5-point ordinal scale15CurrentNo charge~3 minNo3
IEQ [26]d7-point Likert scale20CurrentContact author~4 minNo3
SF-6D [27]4-/5-/6-point ordinal scale6CurrentNo charge for academic/noncommercial use with study registration. License fee for commercial use upon request.<2 minNo3
HAP [28]3‐point ordinal scale: ‘still doing, have stopped doing, never did’102CurrentContact author5–10 minNo3
GHQ-28 [29]4-point Likert scale28Past few weeks5.50 AUD~5 minNo2
PAQOL [30]dOpen-ended responses, 10-point Likert scale19CurrentContact author~4 minNo2
SIP [31]‘Check those that apply’136CurrentContact the Medical Outcomes Trust20–30 minNo2
SWED-Qual [32]4-/5-/6-point Likert scale61Current, past weekContact author~12 minNo2
FACIT-Fatigue [33]5-point Likert scale13Past 7 daysNo charge with study registration5–10 minNo2
QLQ-C30 [34]4-/7-point Likert scale30Current, past week

No charge for academic/noncommercial use with study registration.

License fee for commercial use upon request.

~6 minNo2
RQLPd5-point Likert scale43CurrentContact author5–7 minCKD1
PASE [35]4-point Likert scale, open-ended responses, number of hours, yes/no, ‘which of the following categories best describes…’10Past 7 daysContact New England Research Institutes5–15 minNo1
WPAI-GH [36]Yes/no, number of hours, 11-point Likert scale6Current, past 7 daysContact author<2 minNo1
KDQ [37]d7-point Likert scale26Past 2 weeksContact author10–15 minCKD1
GHQ-12 [29]4-point Likert scale12Past 4 weeks2.25 AUD~2 minNo1
DUKE [38]3-point Likert scale, number of days17Current, past weekContact author~3 minNo1
HMQ [39]Yes/no, 3-/4-/6-point ordinal scale, VAS, open-ended responses37Current, past 2 weeksContact author<10 minNo1
WHODAS II [40]5‐point Likert scale, number of days15Past 30 daysLicense fee upon request~5 minNo1
IPAQ [41]Yes/no, time spent on activities27Past 7 daysNo charge~5 minNo1
ICECAP-O [42]4-point Likert scale5CurrentNo charge with study registration~1 minNo1
MHIQ [43]dYes/no, 3-/5-point Likert scale59CurrentContact author~20 minNo1
PGWB [44]6‐point Likert scale22Past monthContact author<5 minNo1
DRM [45]4-/5-/7-point Likert scale, percentage of time, open-ended responses, yes/no, ;check all that apply;≥110Current, yesterdayContact author45–75 minNo1
9-THAI [46]5-point Likert scale9Past month, last yearContact author~2 minNo1
RAND-36 [47]Yes/no, 3‐/5‐/6‐point Likert scale36Current, past 4 weeksNo charge5–10 minNo1
Author-developed measures (for own study, not validated)
Dąbrowska- Bender et al. [48]d10-point Likert scaleNANAContact authorNAKRT1
Devins et al. [49]dYes/no, number of hours per week5Past 7 daysContact author<2 minCKD1
Fernandes da SilvadNANANAContact authorNAKRT1
Juergensen et al. [50]10-point Likert scale, open-ended responses20CurrentContact author10–15 minKRT1
Panagopouloud [51]NANANAContact authorNAKRT1
Szabod [52]NANANAContact authorNANA1
Tapsond [53]NANANAContact authorNAKRT1
Telld [54]Yes/no1NAContact author<1 minCKD1
a

Where data on completion time were unavailable, authors estimated based on ~12 s/item.

b

Studies used versions 1.1, 1.2 or 1.3.

c

Some studies used EQ-5D-5L and others used EQ-5D-3L.

d

Could not retrieve measure in full.

KRT: kidney replacement therapy; IIRS: Illness Intrusiveness Ratings Scale; NHP: Nottingham Health Profile; 15 D: 15 dimensions; IEQ: Illness Effects Questionnaire; GHQ-28: General Health Questionnaire 28-item; HAP: Human Activity Profile; PAQOL: patient-assessed quality of life; SIP: Sickness Impact Profile; RQLP: Renal Quality of Life Profile; PASE: Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly; WPAI-GH: Work Productivity and Activity Impairment General Health; KDQ: Kidney Disease Questionnaire; GHQ-12: 12-item General Health Questionnaire; DUKE: Duke Health Profile; HMQ: Health Measurement Questionnaire; WHODAS II: World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0; IPAQ: International Physical Activity Questionnaire; QLQ-C30: Quality of Life Questionnaire; MHIQ: McMaster Health Index Questionnaire; PGWB: Psychological General Well-Being Index; DRM: Day Reconstruction Method; FACIT: Fatigue, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy—fatigue scale; SWED-Qual: Swedish Health-Related Quality of Life Survey.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close