Since the expression of AtINH3 was observed preferentially in guard cells, we initially attempted to characterize the physiological function of Inh3 in guard cells using Arabidopsis T-DNA insertion lines. We obtained two T-DNA insertion lines from the SALK and SAIL collections and designated the corresponding alleles inh3-1 (SALK_044593) and inh3-2 (SAIL_806_C02), respectively. The insertions were located in the second exon of AtINH3, 146 and 1 bp downstream of the ATG initiation codon in inh3-1 and inh3-2, respectively (Fig. 6A  
Functional characterization of the AtINH3 disruption mutants. A, Positions of T-DNA insertions in Arabidopsis inh3 mutants. Boxes indicate exons, with black representing the coding sequence and gray the untranslated region. Lines represent introns. Triangles indicate the T-DNA insertion sites of inh3-1 and inh3-2. Arrows represent the gene-specific primers (S1 and AS1) and the T-DNA border primers (LB1 and LB2) used for PCR-based screens. B and C, PCR-based screens of the genotypes in seedlings from heterozygous inh3-1 (B) and inh3-2 (C). PCR was conducted with genomic DNA using a pair of gene-specific primers (top panel) or by the combination of the T-DNA left border primer and the gene-specific primer (bottom panel). The first lane represents the results for the wild-type (WT) control. D, Morphology of seeds from self-pollinated wild-type, heterozygous inh3-1, and heterozygous inh3-2 plants. The aborted seeds are marked with arrowheads. Bar = 1 mm.
Figure 6.

Functional characterization of the AtINH3 disruption mutants. A, Positions of T-DNA insertions in Arabidopsis inh3 mutants. Boxes indicate exons, with black representing the coding sequence and gray the untranslated region. Lines represent introns. Triangles indicate the T-DNA insertion sites of inh3-1 and inh3-2. Arrows represent the gene-specific primers (S1 and AS1) and the T-DNA border primers (LB1 and LB2) used for PCR-based screens. B and C, PCR-based screens of the genotypes in seedlings from heterozygous inh3-1 (B) and inh3-2 (C). PCR was conducted with genomic DNA using a pair of gene-specific primers (top panel) or by the combination of the T-DNA left border primer and the gene-specific primer (bottom panel). The first lane represents the results for the wild-type (WT) control. D, Morphology of seeds from self-pollinated wild-type, heterozygous inh3-1, and heterozygous inh3-2 plants. The aborted seeds are marked with arrowheads. Bar = 1 mm.

). A PCR-based screen using gene-specific primers and the T-DNA left border primer revealed that all the plants from the T3 or T4 generation were the heterozygous or wild-type strains, and there were no homozygous plants (Fig. 6, B and C). All the heterozygous plants were morphologically similar to the wild-type plants and did not show any impairment in stomatal responses (data not shown). Segregation analyses of >100 self-pollinated heterozygous (parent) plants revealed that there was a 2:1 ratio of T-DNA heterozygous plants to wild-type plants (Table I  
Table I.

Segregation ratio of the T-DNA insertion in inh3 mutants


Cross

Insertion+

Insertion−

Total
inh3-1 selfed66.0%34.0%n = 100
inh3-2 selfed66.7%33.3%n = 108
inh3-1/− × wild type41.2%58.8%n = 97
Wild type × inh3-1/−
50.0%
50.0%
n = 98

Cross

Insertion+

Insertion−

Total
inh3-1 selfed66.0%34.0%n = 100
inh3-2 selfed66.7%33.3%n = 108
inh3-1/− × wild type41.2%58.8%n = 97
Wild type × inh3-1/−
50.0%
50.0%
n = 98
Table I.

Segregation ratio of the T-DNA insertion in inh3 mutants


Cross

Insertion+

Insertion−

Total
inh3-1 selfed66.0%34.0%n = 100
inh3-2 selfed66.7%33.3%n = 108
inh3-1/− × wild type41.2%58.8%n = 97
Wild type × inh3-1/−
50.0%
50.0%
n = 98

Cross

Insertion+

Insertion−

Total
inh3-1 selfed66.0%34.0%n = 100
inh3-2 selfed66.7%33.3%n = 108
inh3-1/− × wild type41.2%58.8%n = 97
Wild type × inh3-1/−
50.0%
50.0%
n = 98
), suggesting that a homozygous insertion confers the lethality and/or reduced gametophytic transmission. To test whether the insertion was transmitted normally through both male and female gametophytes, we reciprocally crossed inh3-1 with the wild type and screened F1 plants for the T-DNA insertion by PCR. Transmission of the T-DNA insertion occurred through both gametophytes (Table I).
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close