Table III.
Open in new tab

Model Comparison for Latent Profile Analyses

Number of classesEntropyBICLMR p valueBLRT p valueSmallest class size (n, %)
1NA25,448.435NANA307 (100)
20.84724,587.536.0026*.0000*145 (47)
30.86224,460.418.0003*.0000*68 (22)
40.84724,437.634.2627.0000*25 (8)
50.87024,428.679.4837.0000*17 (5)
60.88924,426.959.3527.0000*20 (7)
Number of classesEntropyBICLMR p valueBLRT p valueSmallest class size (n, %)
1NA25,448.435NANA307 (100)
20.84724,587.536.0026*.0000*145 (47)
30.86224,460.418.0003*.0000*68 (22)
40.84724,437.634.2627.0000*25 (8)
50.87024,428.679.4837.0000*17 (5)
60.88924,426.959.3527.0000*20 (7)

Note. The model solution chosen is bolded.

NA = not applicable; BIC = Bayesian information criterion; BLRT = Bootstrap Likelihood Ratio test; LMR = Lo–Mendell–Rubin test.

*

p < .001.

Table III.
Open in new tab

Model Comparison for Latent Profile Analyses

Number of classesEntropyBICLMR p valueBLRT p valueSmallest class size (n, %)
1NA25,448.435NANA307 (100)
20.84724,587.536.0026*.0000*145 (47)
30.86224,460.418.0003*.0000*68 (22)
40.84724,437.634.2627.0000*25 (8)
50.87024,428.679.4837.0000*17 (5)
60.88924,426.959.3527.0000*20 (7)
Number of classesEntropyBICLMR p valueBLRT p valueSmallest class size (n, %)
1NA25,448.435NANA307 (100)
20.84724,587.536.0026*.0000*145 (47)
30.86224,460.418.0003*.0000*68 (22)
40.84724,437.634.2627.0000*25 (8)
50.87024,428.679.4837.0000*17 (5)
60.88924,426.959.3527.0000*20 (7)

Note. The model solution chosen is bolded.

NA = not applicable; BIC = Bayesian information criterion; BLRT = Bootstrap Likelihood Ratio test; LMR = Lo–Mendell–Rubin test.

*

p < .001.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close