Comparison of membership classification by prf with gmm (Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018; Gao 2018a; d; Geller et al. 2015).
| . | Common . | Common . | Added . | Rejected . |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | Memb . | Cand . | Memb . | Stars . |
| . | [1] . | [2] . | [3] . | [4] . |
| Comparison with gmm | ||||
| Berkeley 67 | 158 | 1 | 5 | 40 |
| King 2 | 506 | 9 | 8 | 101 |
| NGC 2420 | 354 | 12 | 1 | 25 |
| NGC 2477 | 1416 | 33 | 14 | 316 |
| NGC 2682 | 436 | 17 | 1 | 8 |
| NGC 6940 | 338 | 10 | 5 | 60 |
| Comparison with Cantat-Gaudin et al. (2018) | ||||
| Berkeley 67 | 131 | 0 | 261 | 0 |
| King 2 | 104 | 0 | 968 | 3 |
| NGC 2420 | 357 | 7 | 511 | 3 |
| NGC 2477 | 1396 | 46 | 2492 | 39 |
| NGC 2682 | 502 | 28 | 681 | 9 |
| NGC 6940 | 399 | 29 | 290 | 52 |
| Comparison with Gao (2018a) | ||||
| NGC 2477 | 1695 | 67 | 2193 | 133 |
| Comparison with Gao (2018d) | ||||
| NGC 2682 | 950 | 46 | 233 | 16 |
| Comparison with Geller et al. (2015) | ||||
| NGC 2682 | 365 | 34 | 817 | 10 |
| . | Common . | Common . | Added . | Rejected . |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | Memb . | Cand . | Memb . | Stars . |
| . | [1] . | [2] . | [3] . | [4] . |
| Comparison with gmm | ||||
| Berkeley 67 | 158 | 1 | 5 | 40 |
| King 2 | 506 | 9 | 8 | 101 |
| NGC 2420 | 354 | 12 | 1 | 25 |
| NGC 2477 | 1416 | 33 | 14 | 316 |
| NGC 2682 | 436 | 17 | 1 | 8 |
| NGC 6940 | 338 | 10 | 5 | 60 |
| Comparison with Cantat-Gaudin et al. (2018) | ||||
| Berkeley 67 | 131 | 0 | 261 | 0 |
| King 2 | 104 | 0 | 968 | 3 |
| NGC 2420 | 357 | 7 | 511 | 3 |
| NGC 2477 | 1396 | 46 | 2492 | 39 |
| NGC 2682 | 502 | 28 | 681 | 9 |
| NGC 6940 | 399 | 29 | 290 | 52 |
| Comparison with Gao (2018a) | ||||
| NGC 2477 | 1695 | 67 | 2193 | 133 |
| Comparison with Gao (2018d) | ||||
| NGC 2682 | 950 | 46 | 233 | 16 |
| Comparison with Geller et al. (2015) | ||||
| NGC 2682 | 365 | 34 | 817 | 10 |
Notes. [1] Classified as members by both prf and other techniques.
[2] Members of other techniques classified as Candidates by prf.
[3] Added members by prf, which are not members in other catalogues.
[4] Members from other techniques classified as field by prf.
Comparison of membership classification by prf with gmm (Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018; Gao 2018a; d; Geller et al. 2015).
| . | Common . | Common . | Added . | Rejected . |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | Memb . | Cand . | Memb . | Stars . |
| . | [1] . | [2] . | [3] . | [4] . |
| Comparison with gmm | ||||
| Berkeley 67 | 158 | 1 | 5 | 40 |
| King 2 | 506 | 9 | 8 | 101 |
| NGC 2420 | 354 | 12 | 1 | 25 |
| NGC 2477 | 1416 | 33 | 14 | 316 |
| NGC 2682 | 436 | 17 | 1 | 8 |
| NGC 6940 | 338 | 10 | 5 | 60 |
| Comparison with Cantat-Gaudin et al. (2018) | ||||
| Berkeley 67 | 131 | 0 | 261 | 0 |
| King 2 | 104 | 0 | 968 | 3 |
| NGC 2420 | 357 | 7 | 511 | 3 |
| NGC 2477 | 1396 | 46 | 2492 | 39 |
| NGC 2682 | 502 | 28 | 681 | 9 |
| NGC 6940 | 399 | 29 | 290 | 52 |
| Comparison with Gao (2018a) | ||||
| NGC 2477 | 1695 | 67 | 2193 | 133 |
| Comparison with Gao (2018d) | ||||
| NGC 2682 | 950 | 46 | 233 | 16 |
| Comparison with Geller et al. (2015) | ||||
| NGC 2682 | 365 | 34 | 817 | 10 |
| . | Common . | Common . | Added . | Rejected . |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | Memb . | Cand . | Memb . | Stars . |
| . | [1] . | [2] . | [3] . | [4] . |
| Comparison with gmm | ||||
| Berkeley 67 | 158 | 1 | 5 | 40 |
| King 2 | 506 | 9 | 8 | 101 |
| NGC 2420 | 354 | 12 | 1 | 25 |
| NGC 2477 | 1416 | 33 | 14 | 316 |
| NGC 2682 | 436 | 17 | 1 | 8 |
| NGC 6940 | 338 | 10 | 5 | 60 |
| Comparison with Cantat-Gaudin et al. (2018) | ||||
| Berkeley 67 | 131 | 0 | 261 | 0 |
| King 2 | 104 | 0 | 968 | 3 |
| NGC 2420 | 357 | 7 | 511 | 3 |
| NGC 2477 | 1396 | 46 | 2492 | 39 |
| NGC 2682 | 502 | 28 | 681 | 9 |
| NGC 6940 | 399 | 29 | 290 | 52 |
| Comparison with Gao (2018a) | ||||
| NGC 2477 | 1695 | 67 | 2193 | 133 |
| Comparison with Gao (2018d) | ||||
| NGC 2682 | 950 | 46 | 233 | 16 |
| Comparison with Geller et al. (2015) | ||||
| NGC 2682 | 365 | 34 | 817 | 10 |
Notes. [1] Classified as members by both prf and other techniques.
[2] Members of other techniques classified as Candidates by prf.
[3] Added members by prf, which are not members in other catalogues.
[4] Members from other techniques classified as field by prf.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.
