Results of survival analysis for mosquito species reared across different diet environments
| Species . | Location . | χ 2, df . | P value . |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aedes aegypti | AU | 60.27, 3 | <0.001 |
| Aedes aegypti | LA | 89.91, 3 | <0.001 |
| Aedes albopictus | MS | 46.74, 3 | <0.001 |
| Aedes dorsalis | UT | 22.48, 3 | <0.001 |
| Aedes notoscriptus | AU | 91.06, 3 | <0.001 |
| Aedes vigilax | AU | 54.11, 3 | <0.001 |
| Anopheles quadrimaculatus | MS | 59.97, 3 | <0.001 |
| Culex pipiens | UT | 102.62, 3 | <0.001 |
| Culex quinquefasciatus | CA | 107.28, 3 | <0.001 |
| Culex tarsalis | CA | 85.11, 3 | <0.001 |
| Species . | Location . | χ 2, df . | P value . |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aedes aegypti | AU | 60.27, 3 | <0.001 |
| Aedes aegypti | LA | 89.91, 3 | <0.001 |
| Aedes albopictus | MS | 46.74, 3 | <0.001 |
| Aedes dorsalis | UT | 22.48, 3 | <0.001 |
| Aedes notoscriptus | AU | 91.06, 3 | <0.001 |
| Aedes vigilax | AU | 54.11, 3 | <0.001 |
| Anopheles quadrimaculatus | MS | 59.97, 3 | <0.001 |
| Culex pipiens | UT | 102.62, 3 | <0.001 |
| Culex quinquefasciatus | CA | 107.28, 3 | <0.001 |
| Culex tarsalis | CA | 85.11, 3 | <0.001 |
Laboratories where each species were tested are included (Australia = AU, United Sates includes California = CA, Louisiana = LA, Mississippi = MS, and Utah = UT).
Results of survival analysis for mosquito species reared across different diet environments
| Species . | Location . | χ 2, df . | P value . |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aedes aegypti | AU | 60.27, 3 | <0.001 |
| Aedes aegypti | LA | 89.91, 3 | <0.001 |
| Aedes albopictus | MS | 46.74, 3 | <0.001 |
| Aedes dorsalis | UT | 22.48, 3 | <0.001 |
| Aedes notoscriptus | AU | 91.06, 3 | <0.001 |
| Aedes vigilax | AU | 54.11, 3 | <0.001 |
| Anopheles quadrimaculatus | MS | 59.97, 3 | <0.001 |
| Culex pipiens | UT | 102.62, 3 | <0.001 |
| Culex quinquefasciatus | CA | 107.28, 3 | <0.001 |
| Culex tarsalis | CA | 85.11, 3 | <0.001 |
| Species . | Location . | χ 2, df . | P value . |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aedes aegypti | AU | 60.27, 3 | <0.001 |
| Aedes aegypti | LA | 89.91, 3 | <0.001 |
| Aedes albopictus | MS | 46.74, 3 | <0.001 |
| Aedes dorsalis | UT | 22.48, 3 | <0.001 |
| Aedes notoscriptus | AU | 91.06, 3 | <0.001 |
| Aedes vigilax | AU | 54.11, 3 | <0.001 |
| Anopheles quadrimaculatus | MS | 59.97, 3 | <0.001 |
| Culex pipiens | UT | 102.62, 3 | <0.001 |
| Culex quinquefasciatus | CA | 107.28, 3 | <0.001 |
| Culex tarsalis | CA | 85.11, 3 | <0.001 |
Laboratories where each species were tested are included (Australia = AU, United Sates includes California = CA, Louisiana = LA, Mississippi = MS, and Utah = UT).
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.
