Table 3.

Slope and intercept values (±SE) showing the linear relationship between constant temperature and L. delicatula egg developmental rate (1/d) using data sets from the Pennsylvania (PA), Choi et al. (2012), and Park (2015) studies and combined data sets, where T0 is the calculated theoretical base temperature for development and K is thermal constant (total DD) to mean hatch

Data sourceT  0 (°C)KIntercept (±SE) Slope (±SE)dfR  2FP > F
Choi a8.1352−0.0230 ± 0.01230.00284 ± 0.0006020.95722.20.1331
Park a11.1294−0.0379 ± 0.00400.00340 ± 0.0001870.984372.8<0.0001
PA study13.2255−0.0519 ± 0.02070.00392 ± 0.00085930.91220.80.0448
Choi and Park10.2311−0.0329 ± 0.00440.00322 ± 0.00020100.966257.0<0.0001
Choi, Park, and PA study10.4310−0.0337 ± 0.004580.00323 ± 0.000202140.952255.4<0.0001
Data sourceT  0 (°C)KIntercept (±SE) Slope (±SE)dfR  2FP > F
Choi a8.1352−0.0230 ± 0.01230.00284 ± 0.0006020.95722.20.1331
Park a11.1294−0.0379 ± 0.00400.00340 ± 0.0001870.984372.8<0.0001
PA study13.2255−0.0519 ± 0.02070.00392 ± 0.00085930.91220.80.0448
Choi and Park10.2311−0.0329 ± 0.00440.00322 ± 0.00020100.966257.0<0.0001
Choi, Park, and PA study10.4310−0.0337 ± 0.004580.00323 ± 0.000202140.952255.4<0.0001

The df, R2, F-value, and P > F are included for each linear regression fit to each data source.

a Estimates in table may differ slightly from those reported in the original publications due to computational methods.

Table 3.

Slope and intercept values (±SE) showing the linear relationship between constant temperature and L. delicatula egg developmental rate (1/d) using data sets from the Pennsylvania (PA), Choi et al. (2012), and Park (2015) studies and combined data sets, where T0 is the calculated theoretical base temperature for development and K is thermal constant (total DD) to mean hatch

Data sourceT  0 (°C)KIntercept (±SE) Slope (±SE)dfR  2FP > F
Choi a8.1352−0.0230 ± 0.01230.00284 ± 0.0006020.95722.20.1331
Park a11.1294−0.0379 ± 0.00400.00340 ± 0.0001870.984372.8<0.0001
PA study13.2255−0.0519 ± 0.02070.00392 ± 0.00085930.91220.80.0448
Choi and Park10.2311−0.0329 ± 0.00440.00322 ± 0.00020100.966257.0<0.0001
Choi, Park, and PA study10.4310−0.0337 ± 0.004580.00323 ± 0.000202140.952255.4<0.0001
Data sourceT  0 (°C)KIntercept (±SE) Slope (±SE)dfR  2FP > F
Choi a8.1352−0.0230 ± 0.01230.00284 ± 0.0006020.95722.20.1331
Park a11.1294−0.0379 ± 0.00400.00340 ± 0.0001870.984372.8<0.0001
PA study13.2255−0.0519 ± 0.02070.00392 ± 0.00085930.91220.80.0448
Choi and Park10.2311−0.0329 ± 0.00440.00322 ± 0.00020100.966257.0<0.0001
Choi, Park, and PA study10.4310−0.0337 ± 0.004580.00323 ± 0.000202140.952255.4<0.0001

The df, R2, F-value, and P > F are included for each linear regression fit to each data source.

a Estimates in table may differ slightly from those reported in the original publications due to computational methods.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close