Table 1

Clinical characteristics of treatment-naive patients and controls

Eosinophilic fasciitisLocalized scleroderma(Dermato) myositisSpinal muscular atrophyHealthy controls
EFLoS(J)DM+MCTDSMAHC
NetherlandsNetherlandsNetherlands, France & SingaporeNetherlandsNetherlands
n=8n=30n=33+1n=43n=22P-value
Age at diagnosis (years), median (IQR)64.9 (17.1)35.5 (40.4)8.4 (9.5)1.5 (1.7)<0.0001
Age at sampling (years), median (IQR)65.1 (12.8)41.9 (35.1)8.4 (9.5)35.7 (28.4)31 (21)<0.0001
Sex, % female62.566.755.960.568.20.8750
Pediatric patients,%0.016.791.223.30.0
Clinical disease activity scores
Muscle weakness (% of patients)91.2n/a
(J)DM skin symptoms (% of patients)94.1n/a
CMAS (0–52), median (IQR)28.0 (22.3)n/a
NR=12
PGA (0–10), median (IQR)6.0 (1.8)n/a
NR=9
EF/LoS VAS activity (0–100), median (IQR)46.5 (11.8)20.5 (21.3)0.0054
NR=2NR=2
EF/LoS mLoSSI (0–162), median (IQR)42.5 (18.3)16 (12.5)0.0035
NR=2NR=2
EF/LoS VAS damage (0–100), median (IQR)17.5 (20)12 (17)0.5839
NR=2NR=1
EF/LoS LoSDI (0–162), median (IQR)8.5 (6.8)6 (6.5)0.8560
NR=2NR=2
SMA motor score (HMFSE, 0–66), median (IQR)4 (36)n/a
NR=4
Laboratory parameters
% ANA positive42.960.059.40.7006
NR=1NR=10NR=2
CRP (mg/l), median (IQR)10 (1)5 (1.5)1 (2)0.0172
NR=6NR=26NR=3
ESR (mm/hour), median (IQR)16 (7)5 (7.8)16 (10)0.0126
NR=5NR=18NR=5
ALT (IU/l), median (IQR)20.5 (9.5)20.5 (7.8)48.5 (83.3)0.0031
NR=4N=18
AST (IU/l), median (IQR)24 (20.5)102 (480)0.0060
NR=5NR=1
CK (IU/l), median (IQR)37 (2)659 (2865.3)0.0032
NR=6
LDH (IU/l), median (IQR)214.5 (20.5)642 (480)0.0214
NR=6NR=3
Eosinophilic fasciitisLocalized scleroderma(Dermato) myositisSpinal muscular atrophyHealthy controls
EFLoS(J)DM+MCTDSMAHC
NetherlandsNetherlandsNetherlands, France & SingaporeNetherlandsNetherlands
n=8n=30n=33+1n=43n=22P-value
Age at diagnosis (years), median (IQR)64.9 (17.1)35.5 (40.4)8.4 (9.5)1.5 (1.7)<0.0001
Age at sampling (years), median (IQR)65.1 (12.8)41.9 (35.1)8.4 (9.5)35.7 (28.4)31 (21)<0.0001
Sex, % female62.566.755.960.568.20.8750
Pediatric patients,%0.016.791.223.30.0
Clinical disease activity scores
Muscle weakness (% of patients)91.2n/a
(J)DM skin symptoms (% of patients)94.1n/a
CMAS (0–52), median (IQR)28.0 (22.3)n/a
NR=12
PGA (0–10), median (IQR)6.0 (1.8)n/a
NR=9
EF/LoS VAS activity (0–100), median (IQR)46.5 (11.8)20.5 (21.3)0.0054
NR=2NR=2
EF/LoS mLoSSI (0–162), median (IQR)42.5 (18.3)16 (12.5)0.0035
NR=2NR=2
EF/LoS VAS damage (0–100), median (IQR)17.5 (20)12 (17)0.5839
NR=2NR=1
EF/LoS LoSDI (0–162), median (IQR)8.5 (6.8)6 (6.5)0.8560
NR=2NR=2
SMA motor score (HMFSE, 0–66), median (IQR)4 (36)n/a
NR=4
Laboratory parameters
% ANA positive42.960.059.40.7006
NR=1NR=10NR=2
CRP (mg/l), median (IQR)10 (1)5 (1.5)1 (2)0.0172
NR=6NR=26NR=3
ESR (mm/hour), median (IQR)16 (7)5 (7.8)16 (10)0.0126
NR=5NR=18NR=5
ALT (IU/l), median (IQR)20.5 (9.5)20.5 (7.8)48.5 (83.3)0.0031
NR=4N=18
AST (IU/l), median (IQR)24 (20.5)102 (480)0.0060
NR=5NR=1
CK (IU/l), median (IQR)37 (2)659 (2865.3)0.0032
NR=6
LDH (IU/l), median (IQR)214.5 (20.5)642 (480)0.0214
NR=6NR=3

Three patients (two JDM, one LoS) in whom treatment was started max 1 week before sampling, were also considered treatment-naive. For continuous variables, medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) are shown. For categorical variables, frequencies are shown. For comparison between two groups, the Mann–Whitney U test was used for continuous variables and the Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. For comparison between more than two groups, the Kruskal–Wallis test was used for continuous variables and the chi-squared test for categorical variables. (J)DM: (juvenile) dermatomyositis (n = 33); EF: eosinophilic fasciitis (n = 8); HC: healthy controls (n = 22); LoS: localized scleroderma (n = 30); MCTD: mixed connective tissue disease (n = 1); NR: not reported; SMA: spinal muscular atrophy (n = 43); ALT: alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; CK: creatine kinase; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; VAS: visual analogue scale; HMFSE: Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded.

Table 1

Clinical characteristics of treatment-naive patients and controls

Eosinophilic fasciitisLocalized scleroderma(Dermato) myositisSpinal muscular atrophyHealthy controls
EFLoS(J)DM+MCTDSMAHC
NetherlandsNetherlandsNetherlands, France & SingaporeNetherlandsNetherlands
n=8n=30n=33+1n=43n=22P-value
Age at diagnosis (years), median (IQR)64.9 (17.1)35.5 (40.4)8.4 (9.5)1.5 (1.7)<0.0001
Age at sampling (years), median (IQR)65.1 (12.8)41.9 (35.1)8.4 (9.5)35.7 (28.4)31 (21)<0.0001
Sex, % female62.566.755.960.568.20.8750
Pediatric patients,%0.016.791.223.30.0
Clinical disease activity scores
Muscle weakness (% of patients)91.2n/a
(J)DM skin symptoms (% of patients)94.1n/a
CMAS (0–52), median (IQR)28.0 (22.3)n/a
NR=12
PGA (0–10), median (IQR)6.0 (1.8)n/a
NR=9
EF/LoS VAS activity (0–100), median (IQR)46.5 (11.8)20.5 (21.3)0.0054
NR=2NR=2
EF/LoS mLoSSI (0–162), median (IQR)42.5 (18.3)16 (12.5)0.0035
NR=2NR=2
EF/LoS VAS damage (0–100), median (IQR)17.5 (20)12 (17)0.5839
NR=2NR=1
EF/LoS LoSDI (0–162), median (IQR)8.5 (6.8)6 (6.5)0.8560
NR=2NR=2
SMA motor score (HMFSE, 0–66), median (IQR)4 (36)n/a
NR=4
Laboratory parameters
% ANA positive42.960.059.40.7006
NR=1NR=10NR=2
CRP (mg/l), median (IQR)10 (1)5 (1.5)1 (2)0.0172
NR=6NR=26NR=3
ESR (mm/hour), median (IQR)16 (7)5 (7.8)16 (10)0.0126
NR=5NR=18NR=5
ALT (IU/l), median (IQR)20.5 (9.5)20.5 (7.8)48.5 (83.3)0.0031
NR=4N=18
AST (IU/l), median (IQR)24 (20.5)102 (480)0.0060
NR=5NR=1
CK (IU/l), median (IQR)37 (2)659 (2865.3)0.0032
NR=6
LDH (IU/l), median (IQR)214.5 (20.5)642 (480)0.0214
NR=6NR=3
Eosinophilic fasciitisLocalized scleroderma(Dermato) myositisSpinal muscular atrophyHealthy controls
EFLoS(J)DM+MCTDSMAHC
NetherlandsNetherlandsNetherlands, France & SingaporeNetherlandsNetherlands
n=8n=30n=33+1n=43n=22P-value
Age at diagnosis (years), median (IQR)64.9 (17.1)35.5 (40.4)8.4 (9.5)1.5 (1.7)<0.0001
Age at sampling (years), median (IQR)65.1 (12.8)41.9 (35.1)8.4 (9.5)35.7 (28.4)31 (21)<0.0001
Sex, % female62.566.755.960.568.20.8750
Pediatric patients,%0.016.791.223.30.0
Clinical disease activity scores
Muscle weakness (% of patients)91.2n/a
(J)DM skin symptoms (% of patients)94.1n/a
CMAS (0–52), median (IQR)28.0 (22.3)n/a
NR=12
PGA (0–10), median (IQR)6.0 (1.8)n/a
NR=9
EF/LoS VAS activity (0–100), median (IQR)46.5 (11.8)20.5 (21.3)0.0054
NR=2NR=2
EF/LoS mLoSSI (0–162), median (IQR)42.5 (18.3)16 (12.5)0.0035
NR=2NR=2
EF/LoS VAS damage (0–100), median (IQR)17.5 (20)12 (17)0.5839
NR=2NR=1
EF/LoS LoSDI (0–162), median (IQR)8.5 (6.8)6 (6.5)0.8560
NR=2NR=2
SMA motor score (HMFSE, 0–66), median (IQR)4 (36)n/a
NR=4
Laboratory parameters
% ANA positive42.960.059.40.7006
NR=1NR=10NR=2
CRP (mg/l), median (IQR)10 (1)5 (1.5)1 (2)0.0172
NR=6NR=26NR=3
ESR (mm/hour), median (IQR)16 (7)5 (7.8)16 (10)0.0126
NR=5NR=18NR=5
ALT (IU/l), median (IQR)20.5 (9.5)20.5 (7.8)48.5 (83.3)0.0031
NR=4N=18
AST (IU/l), median (IQR)24 (20.5)102 (480)0.0060
NR=5NR=1
CK (IU/l), median (IQR)37 (2)659 (2865.3)0.0032
NR=6
LDH (IU/l), median (IQR)214.5 (20.5)642 (480)0.0214
NR=6NR=3

Three patients (two JDM, one LoS) in whom treatment was started max 1 week before sampling, were also considered treatment-naive. For continuous variables, medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) are shown. For categorical variables, frequencies are shown. For comparison between two groups, the Mann–Whitney U test was used for continuous variables and the Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. For comparison between more than two groups, the Kruskal–Wallis test was used for continuous variables and the chi-squared test for categorical variables. (J)DM: (juvenile) dermatomyositis (n = 33); EF: eosinophilic fasciitis (n = 8); HC: healthy controls (n = 22); LoS: localized scleroderma (n = 30); MCTD: mixed connective tissue disease (n = 1); NR: not reported; SMA: spinal muscular atrophy (n = 43); ALT: alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; CK: creatine kinase; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; VAS: visual analogue scale; HMFSE: Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close