The result of the ANOVA examining functional connectivity—PLI—in the flanker task across age groups
| . | PLI . | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| . | F . | P . | ηp2 . |
| Congruency (C) | 12.38 | <0.01 | 0.53 |
| Previous Congruency (PC) | 2.77 | 0.10 | 0.07 |
| Age Group | 3.73 | 0.06 | 0.26 |
| Channel (Chan) | 0.64 | 0.43 | 0.04 |
| C × PC (CSE) | 1.17 | 0.28 | 0.02 |
| C × Age Group | 1.89 | 0.17 | 0.14 |
| PC × Age Group | 2.32 | 0.13 | 0.06 |
| C × PC × Age Group | <0.01 | 0.97 | <0.01 |
| C × Chan | <0.01 | 1.00 | <0.01 |
| PC × Chan | 0.28 | 0.60 | <0.01 |
| Chan × Age Group | <0.01 | 0.98 | <0.01 |
| C × PC × Chan | 0.08 | 0.78 | <0.01 |
| C × Age Group × Chan | 0.59 | 0.45 | 0.02 |
| PC × Age Group × Chan | 0.16 | 0.69 | <0.01 |
| C × PC × Age Group × Chan | 0.38 | 0.54 | 0.01 |
| . | PLI . | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| . | F . | P . | ηp2 . |
| Congruency (C) | 12.38 | <0.01 | 0.53 |
| Previous Congruency (PC) | 2.77 | 0.10 | 0.07 |
| Age Group | 3.73 | 0.06 | 0.26 |
| Channel (Chan) | 0.64 | 0.43 | 0.04 |
| C × PC (CSE) | 1.17 | 0.28 | 0.02 |
| C × Age Group | 1.89 | 0.17 | 0.14 |
| PC × Age Group | 2.32 | 0.13 | 0.06 |
| C × PC × Age Group | <0.01 | 0.97 | <0.01 |
| C × Chan | <0.01 | 1.00 | <0.01 |
| PC × Chan | 0.28 | 0.60 | <0.01 |
| Chan × Age Group | <0.01 | 0.98 | <0.01 |
| C × PC × Chan | 0.08 | 0.78 | <0.01 |
| C × Age Group × Chan | 0.59 | 0.45 | 0.02 |
| PC × Age Group × Chan | 0.16 | 0.69 | <0.01 |
| C × PC × Age Group × Chan | 0.38 | 0.54 | 0.01 |
Note: The seed electrode was FCz, and the 2 target electrodes (channels) of interest were F5 and F6. All degrees of freedom were 1,57. PLI = Phase-lag index; CSE = congruency sequence effect, ηp2 = partial eta squared.
The result of the ANOVA examining functional connectivity—PLI—in the flanker task across age groups
| . | PLI . | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| . | F . | P . | ηp2 . |
| Congruency (C) | 12.38 | <0.01 | 0.53 |
| Previous Congruency (PC) | 2.77 | 0.10 | 0.07 |
| Age Group | 3.73 | 0.06 | 0.26 |
| Channel (Chan) | 0.64 | 0.43 | 0.04 |
| C × PC (CSE) | 1.17 | 0.28 | 0.02 |
| C × Age Group | 1.89 | 0.17 | 0.14 |
| PC × Age Group | 2.32 | 0.13 | 0.06 |
| C × PC × Age Group | <0.01 | 0.97 | <0.01 |
| C × Chan | <0.01 | 1.00 | <0.01 |
| PC × Chan | 0.28 | 0.60 | <0.01 |
| Chan × Age Group | <0.01 | 0.98 | <0.01 |
| C × PC × Chan | 0.08 | 0.78 | <0.01 |
| C × Age Group × Chan | 0.59 | 0.45 | 0.02 |
| PC × Age Group × Chan | 0.16 | 0.69 | <0.01 |
| C × PC × Age Group × Chan | 0.38 | 0.54 | 0.01 |
| . | PLI . | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| . | F . | P . | ηp2 . |
| Congruency (C) | 12.38 | <0.01 | 0.53 |
| Previous Congruency (PC) | 2.77 | 0.10 | 0.07 |
| Age Group | 3.73 | 0.06 | 0.26 |
| Channel (Chan) | 0.64 | 0.43 | 0.04 |
| C × PC (CSE) | 1.17 | 0.28 | 0.02 |
| C × Age Group | 1.89 | 0.17 | 0.14 |
| PC × Age Group | 2.32 | 0.13 | 0.06 |
| C × PC × Age Group | <0.01 | 0.97 | <0.01 |
| C × Chan | <0.01 | 1.00 | <0.01 |
| PC × Chan | 0.28 | 0.60 | <0.01 |
| Chan × Age Group | <0.01 | 0.98 | <0.01 |
| C × PC × Chan | 0.08 | 0.78 | <0.01 |
| C × Age Group × Chan | 0.59 | 0.45 | 0.02 |
| PC × Age Group × Chan | 0.16 | 0.69 | <0.01 |
| C × PC × Age Group × Chan | 0.38 | 0.54 | 0.01 |
Note: The seed electrode was FCz, and the 2 target electrodes (channels) of interest were F5 and F6. All degrees of freedom were 1,57. PLI = Phase-lag index; CSE = congruency sequence effect, ηp2 = partial eta squared.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.
