Terms from the 2 general linear mixed-effects models investigating flanker task performance in raw and standardized RT across age groups
| Model (AIC value) . | Raw RT (436972.9) . | Standardized RT (90405.1) . | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | χ2(1) | P | B | χ2(1) | P | |
| Congruency (C) | 99.82 | 1047.44 | <0.001 | 1.13 | 922.44 | <0.001 |
| Previous Congruency (PC) | 7.68 | 39.00 | <0.001 | 0.09 | 42.37 | <0.001 |
| Age Group | 47.23 | 16.47 | <0.001 | 0.11 | 4.59 | 0.032 |
| C × PC (CSE) | −8.12 | 37.44 | <0.001 | −0.10 | 48.25 | <0.001 |
| C × Age Group | 17.18 | 3.75 | 0.053 | −0.22 | 15.20 | <0.001 |
| PC × Age Group | 10.98 | 7.92 | 0.005 | 0.06 | 3.91 | 0.048 |
| C × PC × Age Group | −10.04 | 5.50 | 0.019 | −0.05 | 1.75 | 0.186 |
| Model (AIC value) . | Raw RT (436972.9) . | Standardized RT (90405.1) . | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | χ2(1) | P | B | χ2(1) | P | |
| Congruency (C) | 99.82 | 1047.44 | <0.001 | 1.13 | 922.44 | <0.001 |
| Previous Congruency (PC) | 7.68 | 39.00 | <0.001 | 0.09 | 42.37 | <0.001 |
| Age Group | 47.23 | 16.47 | <0.001 | 0.11 | 4.59 | 0.032 |
| C × PC (CSE) | −8.12 | 37.44 | <0.001 | −0.10 | 48.25 | <0.001 |
| C × Age Group | 17.18 | 3.75 | 0.053 | −0.22 | 15.20 | <0.001 |
| PC × Age Group | 10.98 | 7.92 | 0.005 | 0.06 | 3.91 | 0.048 |
| C × PC × Age Group | −10.04 | 5.50 | 0.019 | −0.05 | 1.75 | 0.186 |
Note: For both the raw RT and the standardized RT analyses, the model with random slopes for the main effect of C per participant was selected over models with slopes for the PC × C interaction or no random slopes at all. The AIC values of the competing models were: 436986.4 and 437287.9, respectively, in the raw RT analysis, and 90408.9 and 90933.6, respectively, in the standardized RT analysis. CSE = congruency sequence effect; AIC = Akaike Information Criterion.
Terms from the 2 general linear mixed-effects models investigating flanker task performance in raw and standardized RT across age groups
| Model (AIC value) . | Raw RT (436972.9) . | Standardized RT (90405.1) . | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | χ2(1) | P | B | χ2(1) | P | |
| Congruency (C) | 99.82 | 1047.44 | <0.001 | 1.13 | 922.44 | <0.001 |
| Previous Congruency (PC) | 7.68 | 39.00 | <0.001 | 0.09 | 42.37 | <0.001 |
| Age Group | 47.23 | 16.47 | <0.001 | 0.11 | 4.59 | 0.032 |
| C × PC (CSE) | −8.12 | 37.44 | <0.001 | −0.10 | 48.25 | <0.001 |
| C × Age Group | 17.18 | 3.75 | 0.053 | −0.22 | 15.20 | <0.001 |
| PC × Age Group | 10.98 | 7.92 | 0.005 | 0.06 | 3.91 | 0.048 |
| C × PC × Age Group | −10.04 | 5.50 | 0.019 | −0.05 | 1.75 | 0.186 |
| Model (AIC value) . | Raw RT (436972.9) . | Standardized RT (90405.1) . | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | χ2(1) | P | B | χ2(1) | P | |
| Congruency (C) | 99.82 | 1047.44 | <0.001 | 1.13 | 922.44 | <0.001 |
| Previous Congruency (PC) | 7.68 | 39.00 | <0.001 | 0.09 | 42.37 | <0.001 |
| Age Group | 47.23 | 16.47 | <0.001 | 0.11 | 4.59 | 0.032 |
| C × PC (CSE) | −8.12 | 37.44 | <0.001 | −0.10 | 48.25 | <0.001 |
| C × Age Group | 17.18 | 3.75 | 0.053 | −0.22 | 15.20 | <0.001 |
| PC × Age Group | 10.98 | 7.92 | 0.005 | 0.06 | 3.91 | 0.048 |
| C × PC × Age Group | −10.04 | 5.50 | 0.019 | −0.05 | 1.75 | 0.186 |
Note: For both the raw RT and the standardized RT analyses, the model with random slopes for the main effect of C per participant was selected over models with slopes for the PC × C interaction or no random slopes at all. The AIC values of the competing models were: 436986.4 and 437287.9, respectively, in the raw RT analysis, and 90408.9 and 90933.6, respectively, in the standardized RT analysis. CSE = congruency sequence effect; AIC = Akaike Information Criterion.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.
