Table 2.

Key characteristics of data used in this work.

Band nameEffective wavelengthFilter widthaFWHMPixel scaleReference
(μm)(μm)(arcsec)(arcsec pix−1)(μJy)
unWISE W13.350.736.12.7554Lang (2014), Meisner et al. (2017a), Meisner et al. (2017b)
unWISE W24.601.106.42.7571
IRAC 3.6 |$\, \mu$|m3.550.751.660.8632.91Ashby et al. (2009)
IRAC 4.5 |$\, \mu$|m4.491.021.720.8634.61
IRAC 5.8 |$\, \mu$|m5.731.431.880.86325.35
IRAC 8.0 |$\, \mu$|m7.872.911.980.86328.84
Band nameEffective wavelengthFilter widthFWHMPixel scaleReference
(μm)(μm)(arcsec)(arcsec/pix)(mJy)
WISE W311.568.306.51.3750.7Wright et al. (2010), Cutri et al. (2013)
WISE W422.083.5012.01.3755.0
MIPS 24 |$\, \mu$|m23.684.76.01.2450.2Jannuzi et al. (2010)
MIPS 70 |$\, \mu$|m71.4219.018.04.92531
SPIRE 250 |$\, \mu$|m2437818.1614–26Oliver et al. (2012)
SPIRE 350 |$\, \mu$|m34110624.91011–22
SPIRE 500 |$\, \mu$|m48220036.61414–26
Band nameEffective wavelengthFilter widthaFWHMPixel scaleReference
(μm)(μm)(arcsec)(arcsec pix−1)(μJy)
unWISE W13.350.736.12.7554Lang (2014), Meisner et al. (2017a), Meisner et al. (2017b)
unWISE W24.601.106.42.7571
IRAC 3.6 |$\, \mu$|m3.550.751.660.8632.91Ashby et al. (2009)
IRAC 4.5 |$\, \mu$|m4.491.021.720.8634.61
IRAC 5.8 |$\, \mu$|m5.731.431.880.86325.35
IRAC 8.0 |$\, \mu$|m7.872.911.980.86328.84
Band nameEffective wavelengthFilter widthFWHMPixel scaleReference
(μm)(μm)(arcsec)(arcsec/pix)(mJy)
WISE W311.568.306.51.3750.7Wright et al. (2010), Cutri et al. (2013)
WISE W422.083.5012.01.3755.0
MIPS 24 |$\, \mu$|m23.684.76.01.2450.2Jannuzi et al. (2010)
MIPS 70 |$\, \mu$|m71.4219.018.04.92531
SPIRE 250 |$\, \mu$|m2437818.1614–26Oliver et al. (2012)
SPIRE 350 |$\, \mu$|m34110624.91011–22
SPIRE 500 |$\, \mu$|m48220036.61414–26

aFor the WISE filters, filter widths are approximately measured as full width at half-maxima of the total response function, which includes quantum efficiency, transmission of optics, beamsplitters, and filters. The IRAC sensitivities refer to those measured in 3 arcsec-diameter circular apertures (Ashby et al. 2009).

Table 2.

Key characteristics of data used in this work.

Band nameEffective wavelengthFilter widthaFWHMPixel scaleReference
(μm)(μm)(arcsec)(arcsec pix−1)(μJy)
unWISE W13.350.736.12.7554Lang (2014), Meisner et al. (2017a), Meisner et al. (2017b)
unWISE W24.601.106.42.7571
IRAC 3.6 |$\, \mu$|m3.550.751.660.8632.91Ashby et al. (2009)
IRAC 4.5 |$\, \mu$|m4.491.021.720.8634.61
IRAC 5.8 |$\, \mu$|m5.731.431.880.86325.35
IRAC 8.0 |$\, \mu$|m7.872.911.980.86328.84
Band nameEffective wavelengthFilter widthFWHMPixel scaleReference
(μm)(μm)(arcsec)(arcsec/pix)(mJy)
WISE W311.568.306.51.3750.7Wright et al. (2010), Cutri et al. (2013)
WISE W422.083.5012.01.3755.0
MIPS 24 |$\, \mu$|m23.684.76.01.2450.2Jannuzi et al. (2010)
MIPS 70 |$\, \mu$|m71.4219.018.04.92531
SPIRE 250 |$\, \mu$|m2437818.1614–26Oliver et al. (2012)
SPIRE 350 |$\, \mu$|m34110624.91011–22
SPIRE 500 |$\, \mu$|m48220036.61414–26
Band nameEffective wavelengthFilter widthaFWHMPixel scaleReference
(μm)(μm)(arcsec)(arcsec pix−1)(μJy)
unWISE W13.350.736.12.7554Lang (2014), Meisner et al. (2017a), Meisner et al. (2017b)
unWISE W24.601.106.42.7571
IRAC 3.6 |$\, \mu$|m3.550.751.660.8632.91Ashby et al. (2009)
IRAC 4.5 |$\, \mu$|m4.491.021.720.8634.61
IRAC 5.8 |$\, \mu$|m5.731.431.880.86325.35
IRAC 8.0 |$\, \mu$|m7.872.911.980.86328.84
Band nameEffective wavelengthFilter widthFWHMPixel scaleReference
(μm)(μm)(arcsec)(arcsec/pix)(mJy)
WISE W311.568.306.51.3750.7Wright et al. (2010), Cutri et al. (2013)
WISE W422.083.5012.01.3755.0
MIPS 24 |$\, \mu$|m23.684.76.01.2450.2Jannuzi et al. (2010)
MIPS 70 |$\, \mu$|m71.4219.018.04.92531
SPIRE 250 |$\, \mu$|m2437818.1614–26Oliver et al. (2012)
SPIRE 350 |$\, \mu$|m34110624.91011–22
SPIRE 500 |$\, \mu$|m48220036.61414–26

aFor the WISE filters, filter widths are approximately measured as full width at half-maxima of the total response function, which includes quantum efficiency, transmission of optics, beamsplitters, and filters. The IRAC sensitivities refer to those measured in 3 arcsec-diameter circular apertures (Ashby et al. 2009).

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close