| Variety . | Treatment/Formulation . | Rate/Acre . | App. No. . | Small CEW . | Medium CEW . | Large CEW . | Total . | % Clean ears . | % Processing ears . | % Damaged ears . |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ‘Obsession’ | Untreated Check | ____ | ____ | 3.0 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 41.0 | 0.0b | 9.0b | 91.0a |
| Warrior II | 1.92a | 1–6 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 12.5 | 36.0a | 76.0a | 24.0b | |
| Besiege Warrior II | 10.0a 1.92a | 1,3,5 2,4,6 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 60.0a | 88.0a | 12.0b | |
| ‘Obsession 2’ | Untreated Check | ____ | ____ | 5.5 | 10.8 | 6.5 | 32.0 | 2.0 | 29.0 | 71.0 |
| Warrior II | 1.92a | 1–6 | 6.5 | 4.5 | 2.3 | 16.8 | 29.0 | 64.0 | 36.0 | |
| Besiege Warrior II | 10.0a 1.92a | 1,3,5 2,4,6 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 6.5 | 55.0 | 87.0 | 13.0 | |
| P>F | 0.002 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| Variety . | Treatment/Formulation . | Rate/Acre . | App. No. . | Small CEW . | Medium CEW . | Large CEW . | Total . | % Clean ears . | % Processing ears . | % Damaged ears . |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ‘Obsession’ | Untreated Check | ____ | ____ | 3.0 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 41.0 | 0.0b | 9.0b | 91.0a |
| Warrior II | 1.92a | 1–6 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 12.5 | 36.0a | 76.0a | 24.0b | |
| Besiege Warrior II | 10.0a 1.92a | 1,3,5 2,4,6 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 60.0a | 88.0a | 12.0b | |
| ‘Obsession 2’ | Untreated Check | ____ | ____ | 5.5 | 10.8 | 6.5 | 32.0 | 2.0 | 29.0 | 71.0 |
| Warrior II | 1.92a | 1–6 | 6.5 | 4.5 | 2.3 | 16.8 | 29.0 | 64.0 | 36.0 | |
| Besiege Warrior II | 10.0a 1.92a | 1,3,5 2,4,6 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 6.5 | 55.0 | 87.0 | 13.0 | |
| P>F | 0.002 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
Means within columns followed by the same letter are not significantly different; P > 0.05, Tukey-Kramer HSD.
afl oz/A.
| Variety . | Treatment/Formulation . | Rate/Acre . | App. No. . | Small CEW . | Medium CEW . | Large CEW . | Total . | % Clean ears . | % Processing ears . | % Damaged ears . |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ‘Obsession’ | Untreated Check | ____ | ____ | 3.0 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 41.0 | 0.0b | 9.0b | 91.0a |
| Warrior II | 1.92a | 1–6 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 12.5 | 36.0a | 76.0a | 24.0b | |
| Besiege Warrior II | 10.0a 1.92a | 1,3,5 2,4,6 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 60.0a | 88.0a | 12.0b | |
| ‘Obsession 2’ | Untreated Check | ____ | ____ | 5.5 | 10.8 | 6.5 | 32.0 | 2.0 | 29.0 | 71.0 |
| Warrior II | 1.92a | 1–6 | 6.5 | 4.5 | 2.3 | 16.8 | 29.0 | 64.0 | 36.0 | |
| Besiege Warrior II | 10.0a 1.92a | 1,3,5 2,4,6 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 6.5 | 55.0 | 87.0 | 13.0 | |
| P>F | 0.002 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| Variety . | Treatment/Formulation . | Rate/Acre . | App. No. . | Small CEW . | Medium CEW . | Large CEW . | Total . | % Clean ears . | % Processing ears . | % Damaged ears . |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ‘Obsession’ | Untreated Check | ____ | ____ | 3.0 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 41.0 | 0.0b | 9.0b | 91.0a |
| Warrior II | 1.92a | 1–6 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 12.5 | 36.0a | 76.0a | 24.0b | |
| Besiege Warrior II | 10.0a 1.92a | 1,3,5 2,4,6 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 60.0a | 88.0a | 12.0b | |
| ‘Obsession 2’ | Untreated Check | ____ | ____ | 5.5 | 10.8 | 6.5 | 32.0 | 2.0 | 29.0 | 71.0 |
| Warrior II | 1.92a | 1–6 | 6.5 | 4.5 | 2.3 | 16.8 | 29.0 | 64.0 | 36.0 | |
| Besiege Warrior II | 10.0a 1.92a | 1,3,5 2,4,6 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 6.5 | 55.0 | 87.0 | 13.0 | |
| P>F | 0.002 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
Means within columns followed by the same letter are not significantly different; P > 0.05, Tukey-Kramer HSD.
afl oz/A.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.
