| This consenting document is based on the following principles . |
|---|
| The patient has a right to know about the possibility of visual loss |
| Even though it is rare (estimated ≤1:100,000), it is potentially life-changing |
| The patient may not have proceeded with treatment had they known of this possibility |
| The consenting practitioner should consent the patient to allow remedial action to be taken if an intravascular event is suspected |
| This consenting document is based on the following principles . |
|---|
| The patient has a right to know about the possibility of visual loss |
| Even though it is rare (estimated ≤1:100,000), it is potentially life-changing |
| The patient may not have proceeded with treatment had they known of this possibility |
| The consenting practitioner should consent the patient to allow remedial action to be taken if an intravascular event is suspected |
| This consenting document is based on the following principles . |
|---|
| The patient has a right to know about the possibility of visual loss |
| Even though it is rare (estimated ≤1:100,000), it is potentially life-changing |
| The patient may not have proceeded with treatment had they known of this possibility |
| The consenting practitioner should consent the patient to allow remedial action to be taken if an intravascular event is suspected |
| This consenting document is based on the following principles . |
|---|
| The patient has a right to know about the possibility of visual loss |
| Even though it is rare (estimated ≤1:100,000), it is potentially life-changing |
| The patient may not have proceeded with treatment had they known of this possibility |
| The consenting practitioner should consent the patient to allow remedial action to be taken if an intravascular event is suspected |
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.
