Table 2

Significant Trials in Lung Cancer Brain Metastases

Clinical Trial Number and ReferenceNumber of PatientsPhaseDrugBrain Metastases Patient SelectionResponse DataSurvival Data
UMIN00000175534224IIIProphylactic cranial irradiation vs observation in small-cell lung cancer with no brain metastasesNo brain metastases at baselineNAMedian OS 11.6 months vs 13.7 months (HR 1.27, P = .094)
Iuchi et al.14241IIGefitinib for adenocarcinoma NSCLC with EGFR mutationPatients with symptomatic and asymptomatic brain metastases, no radiotherapy87.8% response rateMedian PFS 14.5 months and median OS 21.9 months.
Exon 19 deletions compared to L858R mutation were associated with better outcomes (OS P = .025)
NCT0229612582556IIIOsimertinib vs first-generation EGFR-TKIOnly patients with stable asymptomatic brain metastases included6% of patients had CNS progression in the osimertinib group compared to 15% in the standard EGFR-TKI groupOsimertinib significantly increased PFS compared to first-generation TKIs (HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.37–0.57)
NCT011541408779IIICrizotinib vs pemetrexed plus cisplatin or carboplatinOnly patients with stable asymptomatic brain metastases includedIntracranial disease control rate was significantly higher with crizotinibat 12 weeks (85% vs 45%; P < .001) and 24 weeks (56% vs 25%, P = .006)PFS was longer in crizotinib group (HR 0.40, P < .001)
NCT0207584095303IIIAlectinib vs crizotinib in ALK-positive NSCLCOnly patients with stable asymptomatic brain metastases included. CNS progression could receive local therapy if isolated asymptomatic CNS progression occurred12% of patients in alectinib group had CNS progression vs 45% in crizotinib group (HR 0.16, P < .001). CNS complete response was significantly more likely in the alectinib group compared to the crizotinib group (45% vs 9%, P < .001)PFS was longer in the alectinib group (HR 0.47, P < .001)
NCT0197086596276IILorlatinibOnly patients with stable asymptomatic brain metastases includedIn patients with at least one prior ALK inhibitor, 51 of 81 patients had an intracranial response (63%; 95% CI 51.5–73.4)NA
NCT02578680108IIIPemetrexed and platinum-based drug plus pembrolizumab or placebo in patients without EGFR or ALK mutationsOnly patients with stable asymptomatic brain metastases includedNAPembrolizumab patients had significantly longer OS (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.20–0.62) and PFS (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.26–0.68)
Clinical Trial Number and ReferenceNumber of PatientsPhaseDrugBrain Metastases Patient SelectionResponse DataSurvival Data
UMIN00000175534224IIIProphylactic cranial irradiation vs observation in small-cell lung cancer with no brain metastasesNo brain metastases at baselineNAMedian OS 11.6 months vs 13.7 months (HR 1.27, P = .094)
Iuchi et al.14241IIGefitinib for adenocarcinoma NSCLC with EGFR mutationPatients with symptomatic and asymptomatic brain metastases, no radiotherapy87.8% response rateMedian PFS 14.5 months and median OS 21.9 months.
Exon 19 deletions compared to L858R mutation were associated with better outcomes (OS P = .025)
NCT0229612582556IIIOsimertinib vs first-generation EGFR-TKIOnly patients with stable asymptomatic brain metastases included6% of patients had CNS progression in the osimertinib group compared to 15% in the standard EGFR-TKI groupOsimertinib significantly increased PFS compared to first-generation TKIs (HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.37–0.57)
NCT011541408779IIICrizotinib vs pemetrexed plus cisplatin or carboplatinOnly patients with stable asymptomatic brain metastases includedIntracranial disease control rate was significantly higher with crizotinibat 12 weeks (85% vs 45%; P < .001) and 24 weeks (56% vs 25%, P = .006)PFS was longer in crizotinib group (HR 0.40, P < .001)
NCT0207584095303IIIAlectinib vs crizotinib in ALK-positive NSCLCOnly patients with stable asymptomatic brain metastases included. CNS progression could receive local therapy if isolated asymptomatic CNS progression occurred12% of patients in alectinib group had CNS progression vs 45% in crizotinib group (HR 0.16, P < .001). CNS complete response was significantly more likely in the alectinib group compared to the crizotinib group (45% vs 9%, P < .001)PFS was longer in the alectinib group (HR 0.47, P < .001)
NCT0197086596276IILorlatinibOnly patients with stable asymptomatic brain metastases includedIn patients with at least one prior ALK inhibitor, 51 of 81 patients had an intracranial response (63%; 95% CI 51.5–73.4)NA
NCT02578680108IIIPemetrexed and platinum-based drug plus pembrolizumab or placebo in patients without EGFR or ALK mutationsOnly patients with stable asymptomatic brain metastases includedNAPembrolizumab patients had significantly longer OS (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.20–0.62) and PFS (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.26–0.68)
Table 2

Significant Trials in Lung Cancer Brain Metastases

Clinical Trial Number and ReferenceNumber of PatientsPhaseDrugBrain Metastases Patient SelectionResponse DataSurvival Data
UMIN00000175534224IIIProphylactic cranial irradiation vs observation in small-cell lung cancer with no brain metastasesNo brain metastases at baselineNAMedian OS 11.6 months vs 13.7 months (HR 1.27, P = .094)
Iuchi et al.14241IIGefitinib for adenocarcinoma NSCLC with EGFR mutationPatients with symptomatic and asymptomatic brain metastases, no radiotherapy87.8% response rateMedian PFS 14.5 months and median OS 21.9 months.
Exon 19 deletions compared to L858R mutation were associated with better outcomes (OS P = .025)
NCT0229612582556IIIOsimertinib vs first-generation EGFR-TKIOnly patients with stable asymptomatic brain metastases included6% of patients had CNS progression in the osimertinib group compared to 15% in the standard EGFR-TKI groupOsimertinib significantly increased PFS compared to first-generation TKIs (HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.37–0.57)
NCT011541408779IIICrizotinib vs pemetrexed plus cisplatin or carboplatinOnly patients with stable asymptomatic brain metastases includedIntracranial disease control rate was significantly higher with crizotinibat 12 weeks (85% vs 45%; P < .001) and 24 weeks (56% vs 25%, P = .006)PFS was longer in crizotinib group (HR 0.40, P < .001)
NCT0207584095303IIIAlectinib vs crizotinib in ALK-positive NSCLCOnly patients with stable asymptomatic brain metastases included. CNS progression could receive local therapy if isolated asymptomatic CNS progression occurred12% of patients in alectinib group had CNS progression vs 45% in crizotinib group (HR 0.16, P < .001). CNS complete response was significantly more likely in the alectinib group compared to the crizotinib group (45% vs 9%, P < .001)PFS was longer in the alectinib group (HR 0.47, P < .001)
NCT0197086596276IILorlatinibOnly patients with stable asymptomatic brain metastases includedIn patients with at least one prior ALK inhibitor, 51 of 81 patients had an intracranial response (63%; 95% CI 51.5–73.4)NA
NCT02578680108IIIPemetrexed and platinum-based drug plus pembrolizumab or placebo in patients without EGFR or ALK mutationsOnly patients with stable asymptomatic brain metastases includedNAPembrolizumab patients had significantly longer OS (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.20–0.62) and PFS (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.26–0.68)
Clinical Trial Number and ReferenceNumber of PatientsPhaseDrugBrain Metastases Patient SelectionResponse DataSurvival Data
UMIN00000175534224IIIProphylactic cranial irradiation vs observation in small-cell lung cancer with no brain metastasesNo brain metastases at baselineNAMedian OS 11.6 months vs 13.7 months (HR 1.27, P = .094)
Iuchi et al.14241IIGefitinib for adenocarcinoma NSCLC with EGFR mutationPatients with symptomatic and asymptomatic brain metastases, no radiotherapy87.8% response rateMedian PFS 14.5 months and median OS 21.9 months.
Exon 19 deletions compared to L858R mutation were associated with better outcomes (OS P = .025)
NCT0229612582556IIIOsimertinib vs first-generation EGFR-TKIOnly patients with stable asymptomatic brain metastases included6% of patients had CNS progression in the osimertinib group compared to 15% in the standard EGFR-TKI groupOsimertinib significantly increased PFS compared to first-generation TKIs (HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.37–0.57)
NCT011541408779IIICrizotinib vs pemetrexed plus cisplatin or carboplatinOnly patients with stable asymptomatic brain metastases includedIntracranial disease control rate was significantly higher with crizotinibat 12 weeks (85% vs 45%; P < .001) and 24 weeks (56% vs 25%, P = .006)PFS was longer in crizotinib group (HR 0.40, P < .001)
NCT0207584095303IIIAlectinib vs crizotinib in ALK-positive NSCLCOnly patients with stable asymptomatic brain metastases included. CNS progression could receive local therapy if isolated asymptomatic CNS progression occurred12% of patients in alectinib group had CNS progression vs 45% in crizotinib group (HR 0.16, P < .001). CNS complete response was significantly more likely in the alectinib group compared to the crizotinib group (45% vs 9%, P < .001)PFS was longer in the alectinib group (HR 0.47, P < .001)
NCT0197086596276IILorlatinibOnly patients with stable asymptomatic brain metastases includedIn patients with at least one prior ALK inhibitor, 51 of 81 patients had an intracranial response (63%; 95% CI 51.5–73.4)NA
NCT02578680108IIIPemetrexed and platinum-based drug plus pembrolizumab or placebo in patients without EGFR or ALK mutationsOnly patients with stable asymptomatic brain metastases includedNAPembrolizumab patients had significantly longer OS (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.20–0.62) and PFS (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.26–0.68)
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close