Table 8. Open in new tab Production of...

Variable	Stimulation	DT				SEM	P-value
IL8	ConA	0.89	0.75	0.60	0.57	0.28	0.71
	LPS	2.57	3.21	2.56	2.30	0.65	0.54
	PMA	2.75	2.92	2.80	2.08	0.54	0.47
IL10	ConA	3.52	4.17	3.18	2.43	0.77	0.12
	LPS	4.17	4.93	4.09	3.38	0.85	0.25
	PMA	3.58	4.36	3.65	2.76	0.78	0.25
TNF-α	ConA	2.39^ab	2.85^a	2.08^ab	1.59^b	0.43	0.06
	LPS	2.10	2.87	2.35	1.96	0.41	0.19
	PMA	3.36	3.97	3.71	2.60	0.56	0.06

Variable	Stimulation	DT				SEM	P-value
IL8	ConA	0.89	0.75	0.60	0.57	0.28	0.71
	LPS	2.57	3.21	2.56	2.30	0.65	0.54
	PMA	2.75	2.92	2.80	2.08	0.54	0.47
IL10	ConA	3.52	4.17	3.18	2.43	0.77	0.12
	LPS	4.17	4.93	4.09	3.38	0.85	0.25
	PMA	3.58	4.36	3.65	2.76	0.78	0.25
TNF-α	ConA	2.39^ab	2.85^a	2.08^ab	1.59^b	0.43	0.06
	LPS	2.10	2.87	2.35	1.96	0.41	0.19
	PMA	3.36	3.97	3.71	2.60	0.56	0.06

Table 8.

Production of IL8, IL10, and TNF-α by PBMC in response to ConA, PMA, or LPS stimulation in 42-d-old piglets fed different experimental diets¹

Variable	Stimulation	DT				SEM	P-value
		CTRL	ATB	CKTL	CKTL + COL
IL8	ConA	0.89	0.75	0.60	0.57	0.28	0.71
	LPS	2.57	3.21	2.56	2.30	0.65	0.54
	PMA	2.75	2.92	2.80	2.08	0.54	0.47
IL10	ConA	3.52	4.17	3.18	2.43	0.77	0.12
	LPS	4.17	4.93	4.09	3.38	0.85	0.25
	PMA	3.58	4.36	3.65	2.76	0.78	0.25
TNF-α	ConA	2.39^ab	2.85^a	2.08^ab	1.59^b	0.43	0.06
	LPS	2.10	2.87	2.35	1.96	0.41	0.19
	PMA	3.36	3.97	3.71	2.60	0.56	0.06

Variable	Stimulation	DT				SEM	P-value
		CTRL	ATB	CKTL	CKTL + COL
IL8	ConA	0.89	0.75	0.60	0.57	0.28	0.71
	LPS	2.57	3.21	2.56	2.30	0.65	0.54
	PMA	2.75	2.92	2.80	2.08	0.54	0.47
IL10	ConA	3.52	4.17	3.18	2.43	0.77	0.12
	LPS	4.17	4.93	4.09	3.38	0.85	0.25
	PMA	3.58	4.36	3.65	2.76	0.78	0.25
TNF-α	ConA	2.39^ab	2.85^a	2.08^ab	1.59^b	0.43	0.06
	LPS	2.10	2.87	2.35	1.96	0.41	0.19
	PMA	3.36	3.97	3.71	2.60	0.56	0.06

¹Data are reported as delta values relative to the basal condition and expressed as log₂ pg/mL.

^a,bResults of the Tukey’s test: within a row, means without a common superscript differ (P < 0.05).