Image name . | Description . | Frequency . | Synthesized beam . | |$\sigma _{\rm rms}^a$| . |
---|---|---|---|---|
. | . | . | . | (μJy beam−1) . |
VLA | Naturally weighted | 1.5 GHz | 1.68 × 1.48 arcsec2 @ |$105{^{\circ}_{.}}88$| | 2.04 |
Combined (Max. Sens.) | e-MERLIN + VLA combined-array image, | 1.5 GHz | 0.89 × 0.78 arcsec2 @ 105○ | 1.71 |
weighted for improved sensitivity | ||||
Combined (PSF Match) | e-MERLIN + VLA, weighted to match VLA | 1.5 GHz | 0.56 × 0.47 arcsec2 @ 88○ | 1.94 |
5.5-GHz resolution for spectral index work | ||||
Combined (Max. Res.) | e-MERLIN + VLA, weighted for | 1.5 GHz | 0.28 × 0.26 arcsec2 @ 84○ | 1.17 |
improved angular resolution | ||||
e-MERLIN | e-MERLIN-only, naturally weighted | 1.5 GHz | 0.31 × 0.21 arcsec2 @ 149○ | 2.50 |
C-band mosaic | 5.5 GHz, naturally weighted mosaicb | 5.5 GHz | 0.56 × 0.47 arcsec2 @ 88○ | 1.84 |
Image name . | Description . | Frequency . | Synthesized beam . | |$\sigma _{\rm rms}^a$| . |
---|---|---|---|---|
. | . | . | . | (μJy beam−1) . |
VLA | Naturally weighted | 1.5 GHz | 1.68 × 1.48 arcsec2 @ |$105{^{\circ}_{.}}88$| | 2.04 |
Combined (Max. Sens.) | e-MERLIN + VLA combined-array image, | 1.5 GHz | 0.89 × 0.78 arcsec2 @ 105○ | 1.71 |
weighted for improved sensitivity | ||||
Combined (PSF Match) | e-MERLIN + VLA, weighted to match VLA | 1.5 GHz | 0.56 × 0.47 arcsec2 @ 88○ | 1.94 |
5.5-GHz resolution for spectral index work | ||||
Combined (Max. Res.) | e-MERLIN + VLA, weighted for | 1.5 GHz | 0.28 × 0.26 arcsec2 @ 84○ | 1.17 |
improved angular resolution | ||||
e-MERLIN | e-MERLIN-only, naturally weighted | 1.5 GHz | 0.31 × 0.21 arcsec2 @ 149○ | 2.50 |
C-band mosaic | 5.5 GHz, naturally weighted mosaicb | 5.5 GHz | 0.56 × 0.47 arcsec2 @ 88○ | 1.84 |
aσrms values are in units of |$\mu$|Jy beam−1, and are therefore dependent on the beam size – the ‘max res’ combination image has the lowest σrms (and therefore, the best point-source sensitivity of all images in this data release), however, the small beam limits its sensitivity to extended emission, to which the lower resolution combined-array images – with slightly higher σrms – are more sensitive.
bPreviously published by Guidetti et al. (2017).
Image name . | Description . | Frequency . | Synthesized beam . | |$\sigma _{\rm rms}^a$| . |
---|---|---|---|---|
. | . | . | . | (μJy beam−1) . |
VLA | Naturally weighted | 1.5 GHz | 1.68 × 1.48 arcsec2 @ |$105{^{\circ}_{.}}88$| | 2.04 |
Combined (Max. Sens.) | e-MERLIN + VLA combined-array image, | 1.5 GHz | 0.89 × 0.78 arcsec2 @ 105○ | 1.71 |
weighted for improved sensitivity | ||||
Combined (PSF Match) | e-MERLIN + VLA, weighted to match VLA | 1.5 GHz | 0.56 × 0.47 arcsec2 @ 88○ | 1.94 |
5.5-GHz resolution for spectral index work | ||||
Combined (Max. Res.) | e-MERLIN + VLA, weighted for | 1.5 GHz | 0.28 × 0.26 arcsec2 @ 84○ | 1.17 |
improved angular resolution | ||||
e-MERLIN | e-MERLIN-only, naturally weighted | 1.5 GHz | 0.31 × 0.21 arcsec2 @ 149○ | 2.50 |
C-band mosaic | 5.5 GHz, naturally weighted mosaicb | 5.5 GHz | 0.56 × 0.47 arcsec2 @ 88○ | 1.84 |
Image name . | Description . | Frequency . | Synthesized beam . | |$\sigma _{\rm rms}^a$| . |
---|---|---|---|---|
. | . | . | . | (μJy beam−1) . |
VLA | Naturally weighted | 1.5 GHz | 1.68 × 1.48 arcsec2 @ |$105{^{\circ}_{.}}88$| | 2.04 |
Combined (Max. Sens.) | e-MERLIN + VLA combined-array image, | 1.5 GHz | 0.89 × 0.78 arcsec2 @ 105○ | 1.71 |
weighted for improved sensitivity | ||||
Combined (PSF Match) | e-MERLIN + VLA, weighted to match VLA | 1.5 GHz | 0.56 × 0.47 arcsec2 @ 88○ | 1.94 |
5.5-GHz resolution for spectral index work | ||||
Combined (Max. Res.) | e-MERLIN + VLA, weighted for | 1.5 GHz | 0.28 × 0.26 arcsec2 @ 84○ | 1.17 |
improved angular resolution | ||||
e-MERLIN | e-MERLIN-only, naturally weighted | 1.5 GHz | 0.31 × 0.21 arcsec2 @ 149○ | 2.50 |
C-band mosaic | 5.5 GHz, naturally weighted mosaicb | 5.5 GHz | 0.56 × 0.47 arcsec2 @ 88○ | 1.84 |
aσrms values are in units of |$\mu$|Jy beam−1, and are therefore dependent on the beam size – the ‘max res’ combination image has the lowest σrms (and therefore, the best point-source sensitivity of all images in this data release), however, the small beam limits its sensitivity to extended emission, to which the lower resolution combined-array images – with slightly higher σrms – are more sensitive.
bPreviously published by Guidetti et al. (2017).
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.