Risk of adverse outcomes in patients treated with catheter ablationClassReferences
Patients that undergo an AF ablation should be monitored closely in the first 30 days after the procedure due to a higher risk of neurological, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, vascular and peripheral complications.graphic319–324
Wolff–Parkinson–White syndrome patients following radiofrequency ablation may benefit from additional follow-up due to a persistent elevated risk of developing AF compared to the general population.graphic295,325
Risk of adverse outcomes in patients treated with catheter ablationClassReferences
Patients that undergo an AF ablation should be monitored closely in the first 30 days after the procedure due to a higher risk of neurological, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, vascular and peripheral complications.graphic319–324
Wolff–Parkinson–White syndrome patients following radiofrequency ablation may benefit from additional follow-up due to a persistent elevated risk of developing AF compared to the general population.graphic295,325
Risk of adverse outcomes in patients treated with catheter ablationClassReferences
Patients that undergo an AF ablation should be monitored closely in the first 30 days after the procedure due to a higher risk of neurological, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, vascular and peripheral complications.graphic319–324
Wolff–Parkinson–White syndrome patients following radiofrequency ablation may benefit from additional follow-up due to a persistent elevated risk of developing AF compared to the general population.graphic295,325
Risk of adverse outcomes in patients treated with catheter ablationClassReferences
Patients that undergo an AF ablation should be monitored closely in the first 30 days after the procedure due to a higher risk of neurological, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, vascular and peripheral complications.graphic319–324
Wolff–Parkinson–White syndrome patients following radiofrequency ablation may benefit from additional follow-up due to a persistent elevated risk of developing AF compared to the general population.graphic295,325
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close