Table 4

Level 1 evidence by prospective randomized phase III trials in multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy APBI (low dose rate—LDR or high dose rate—HDR)

TrialPtsaMFU (years)Selection criteriaMBT type/fractionationLR rate (%)Excel/good cosmesis (%)
Hungarian Trial (single institution)  Polgár (28)130 vs. 128 (88/40)5.2T1 N0–1mi, nonlobular, no EIC, SM cleardWBIR vs. HDR/electrons 50 Gy in 25 f vs. 36.4 Gy (7 × 5.2 Gy)c, over 4 days/50 Gy in 25 f3.4 in WBI vs. 4.7 in APBI (P = 0.5)77.6% APBI (HDR 81.2, 70% electrons) vs. 62.9% control group (52.2% telecobalt WBIR, 65.6% 6–9 MV photons (P = 0.009)
Hungarian Trial (single institution)  Polgár (29)25810.2See Polgár (28)See Polgár (28)5.1 in WBI vs. 5.9 in APBI (P = 0.77)81% APBI vs. 63% WBIR (P < 0.01)
GEC-ESTRO (multi-institutional)

 Strnad (30)

 Polgár (32)

11845Age ≥ 40 years, T1–2 (<3 cm), pN0-mi, SM clear >2 mmd, no LVSIb, unifocal/−centricWBIR vs. APBI 50 + 10 boost in 30 f vs. 32 Gy (8 × 4 Gy)c, over 4 days0.92 in WBI vs. 1.44 in APBI (P = 0.42)93% APBI vs. 92% WBIR (P = 0.62)
TrialPtsaMFU (years)Selection criteriaMBT type/fractionationLR rate (%)Excel/good cosmesis (%)
Hungarian Trial (single institution)  Polgár (28)130 vs. 128 (88/40)5.2T1 N0–1mi, nonlobular, no EIC, SM cleardWBIR vs. HDR/electrons 50 Gy in 25 f vs. 36.4 Gy (7 × 5.2 Gy)c, over 4 days/50 Gy in 25 f3.4 in WBI vs. 4.7 in APBI (P = 0.5)77.6% APBI (HDR 81.2, 70% electrons) vs. 62.9% control group (52.2% telecobalt WBIR, 65.6% 6–9 MV photons (P = 0.009)
Hungarian Trial (single institution)  Polgár (29)25810.2See Polgár (28)See Polgár (28)5.1 in WBI vs. 5.9 in APBI (P = 0.77)81% APBI vs. 63% WBIR (P < 0.01)
GEC-ESTRO (multi-institutional)

 Strnad (30)

 Polgár (32)

11845Age ≥ 40 years, T1–2 (<3 cm), pN0-mi, SM clear >2 mmd, no LVSIb, unifocal/−centricWBIR vs. APBI 50 + 10 boost in 30 f vs. 32 Gy (8 × 4 Gy)c, over 4 days0.92 in WBI vs. 1.44 in APBI (P = 0.42)93% APBI vs. 92% WBIR (P = 0.62)

aNot reported.

bLymphovascular invasion (LVSI).

cTwice-daily fractionation.

dSurgical margins.

Table 4

Level 1 evidence by prospective randomized phase III trials in multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy APBI (low dose rate—LDR or high dose rate—HDR)

TrialPtsaMFU (years)Selection criteriaMBT type/fractionationLR rate (%)Excel/good cosmesis (%)
Hungarian Trial (single institution)  Polgár (28)130 vs. 128 (88/40)5.2T1 N0–1mi, nonlobular, no EIC, SM cleardWBIR vs. HDR/electrons 50 Gy in 25 f vs. 36.4 Gy (7 × 5.2 Gy)c, over 4 days/50 Gy in 25 f3.4 in WBI vs. 4.7 in APBI (P = 0.5)77.6% APBI (HDR 81.2, 70% electrons) vs. 62.9% control group (52.2% telecobalt WBIR, 65.6% 6–9 MV photons (P = 0.009)
Hungarian Trial (single institution)  Polgár (29)25810.2See Polgár (28)See Polgár (28)5.1 in WBI vs. 5.9 in APBI (P = 0.77)81% APBI vs. 63% WBIR (P < 0.01)
GEC-ESTRO (multi-institutional)

 Strnad (30)

 Polgár (32)

11845Age ≥ 40 years, T1–2 (<3 cm), pN0-mi, SM clear >2 mmd, no LVSIb, unifocal/−centricWBIR vs. APBI 50 + 10 boost in 30 f vs. 32 Gy (8 × 4 Gy)c, over 4 days0.92 in WBI vs. 1.44 in APBI (P = 0.42)93% APBI vs. 92% WBIR (P = 0.62)
TrialPtsaMFU (years)Selection criteriaMBT type/fractionationLR rate (%)Excel/good cosmesis (%)
Hungarian Trial (single institution)  Polgár (28)130 vs. 128 (88/40)5.2T1 N0–1mi, nonlobular, no EIC, SM cleardWBIR vs. HDR/electrons 50 Gy in 25 f vs. 36.4 Gy (7 × 5.2 Gy)c, over 4 days/50 Gy in 25 f3.4 in WBI vs. 4.7 in APBI (P = 0.5)77.6% APBI (HDR 81.2, 70% electrons) vs. 62.9% control group (52.2% telecobalt WBIR, 65.6% 6–9 MV photons (P = 0.009)
Hungarian Trial (single institution)  Polgár (29)25810.2See Polgár (28)See Polgár (28)5.1 in WBI vs. 5.9 in APBI (P = 0.77)81% APBI vs. 63% WBIR (P < 0.01)
GEC-ESTRO (multi-institutional)

 Strnad (30)

 Polgár (32)

11845Age ≥ 40 years, T1–2 (<3 cm), pN0-mi, SM clear >2 mmd, no LVSIb, unifocal/−centricWBIR vs. APBI 50 + 10 boost in 30 f vs. 32 Gy (8 × 4 Gy)c, over 4 days0.92 in WBI vs. 1.44 in APBI (P = 0.42)93% APBI vs. 92% WBIR (P = 0.62)

aNot reported.

bLymphovascular invasion (LVSI).

cTwice-daily fractionation.

dSurgical margins.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close