Authors . | RAC dose . | Duration, d . | Pigs, # . | Methodology . | Results . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rocha et al., 2013 | 0 and 7.5 mg/kg | 28 | 1488 | Continuous observation of agonistic behaviors during the first hour of lairage was conducted on the number and duration of fights (a sequence of 2 or more pigs biting, head knocking, pushing, and shoving lasting greater than 3 s). Skin damage and bruising were evaluated using a 5-point photographic scale) in the cooler the d of slaughter. | RAC fed immune-castrates had 4 more fights than non-RAC immune-castrates, and 10 more fights than RAC fed surgical castrates (P < 0.05). RAC pigs fought for shorter durations (5 s; P = 0.05) than control pigs. RAC had no effect on overall skin damage score. |
Athayde et al., 2013 | 0, 5, and 10 mg/kg | 28 | 90 | The number of skin and carcass lesions were evaluated on the shoulder, loin, and ham of pigs before loading, after unloading, during lairage, and 24 h after slaughter. | RAC and gender had no effects on the total number of skin or carcass lesions. |
Poletto et al., 2010a | 0 mg/kg and RAC step-up (5 mg/kg for 14 d, then 10 mg/kg for 14 d) | 28 | 32 | Continuous observation was conducted in the home pen (for 3 h periods, once per wk for 5 wk) on the number of agonistic social interactions (Offensive behaviors: bites, head knocks, pursuit, threats; Defensive behaviors: freeze, avoidance or flight) and constituent actions displayed by 2 pigs. | The average number of agonistic interactions increased (55%) in RAC fed gilts and decreased (approximately 26%) in all other RAC × Gender treatments. RAC fed gilts increased bites (96%) and pursuits (335%) per agonistic interaction vs. baseline, while decreased bites (34%) and pursuits (46%) occurred in the other RAC × Gender treatments (P < 0.001). Head knocks per agonistic interaction increased for RAC fed barrows (14%) and CON gilts (21%) vs. baseline, and decreased head knocks (20%) occurred in the other RAC × Gender treatments (P < 0.05). The total number of agonistic social interactions was not affected by RAC. |
Poletto et al., 2010b | 0 mg/kg and RAC step-up (5 mg/kg for 14 d, then 10 mg/kg for 14 d) | 28 | 32 | Dominant and subordinate pigs from each pen were subjected to six 300 s resident-intruder (R-I) tests on d –6, –5, 9, 10, 23, and 24 of the feeding trial. The latency to the first attack (physical bite or a sequence of bites) and number of attacks over the 300 s tests by resident and intruder pigs were recorded. | RAC did not affect the latency to first attack. There was a significant RAC × gender × social rank interaction for the increased likelihood of resident dominant control gilts initiating bites compared to subordinate control (272%) and subordinate RAC fed gilts (276%), but not different from dominant RAC fed gilts. At 30 s of the R-I tests, increased cumulative resident pig attacks occurred by the RAC dominant gilts (38%) and RAC subordinate gilts (42%) vs. the average frequency (11%) of the other treatments. At 300 s, higher cumulative attacks occurred by control dominant gilts (92%), RAC dominant barrows (79%), and RAC subordinate gilts (79%) compared to control subordinate gilts (46%) and barrows (54%), and RAC subordinate barrows (46%). Within RAC, the odds of biting increased for dominant resident pigs (gilts = 228%; barrows: = 185%), and subordinate barrows were 58% more likely to initiate bites than subordinate RAC fed gilts. |
Marchant-Forde et al., 2003 | 0 and 10 mg/kg | 28 | 72 | Behavior scan sampling in the home pen was conducted (every 5 min for 22 h, one time per wk) on agonistic interactions. Pigs were also subjected to weekly disturbance tests, and latency to lie down after disturbance was recorded. | RAC had no effects on agonistic behaviors. |
Schaefer et al., 1992 | 0, 15, and 20 mg/kg | 25–36 | 86 | Behavior scan sampling in the home pen was conducted on Lacombe bred gilts and barrows every 5 min (between 0800 and 1200 h) for the frequency of the following for agonistic behaviors: parallel pressing. Reverse parallel pressing, head-to-head knocks, head-to-body knocks, biting, and replacing another pig. | RAC and gender had no effects on agonistic behaviors. |
Authors . | RAC dose . | Duration, d . | Pigs, # . | Methodology . | Results . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rocha et al., 2013 | 0 and 7.5 mg/kg | 28 | 1488 | Continuous observation of agonistic behaviors during the first hour of lairage was conducted on the number and duration of fights (a sequence of 2 or more pigs biting, head knocking, pushing, and shoving lasting greater than 3 s). Skin damage and bruising were evaluated using a 5-point photographic scale) in the cooler the d of slaughter. | RAC fed immune-castrates had 4 more fights than non-RAC immune-castrates, and 10 more fights than RAC fed surgical castrates (P < 0.05). RAC pigs fought for shorter durations (5 s; P = 0.05) than control pigs. RAC had no effect on overall skin damage score. |
Athayde et al., 2013 | 0, 5, and 10 mg/kg | 28 | 90 | The number of skin and carcass lesions were evaluated on the shoulder, loin, and ham of pigs before loading, after unloading, during lairage, and 24 h after slaughter. | RAC and gender had no effects on the total number of skin or carcass lesions. |
Poletto et al., 2010a | 0 mg/kg and RAC step-up (5 mg/kg for 14 d, then 10 mg/kg for 14 d) | 28 | 32 | Continuous observation was conducted in the home pen (for 3 h periods, once per wk for 5 wk) on the number of agonistic social interactions (Offensive behaviors: bites, head knocks, pursuit, threats; Defensive behaviors: freeze, avoidance or flight) and constituent actions displayed by 2 pigs. | The average number of agonistic interactions increased (55%) in RAC fed gilts and decreased (approximately 26%) in all other RAC × Gender treatments. RAC fed gilts increased bites (96%) and pursuits (335%) per agonistic interaction vs. baseline, while decreased bites (34%) and pursuits (46%) occurred in the other RAC × Gender treatments (P < 0.001). Head knocks per agonistic interaction increased for RAC fed barrows (14%) and CON gilts (21%) vs. baseline, and decreased head knocks (20%) occurred in the other RAC × Gender treatments (P < 0.05). The total number of agonistic social interactions was not affected by RAC. |
Poletto et al., 2010b | 0 mg/kg and RAC step-up (5 mg/kg for 14 d, then 10 mg/kg for 14 d) | 28 | 32 | Dominant and subordinate pigs from each pen were subjected to six 300 s resident-intruder (R-I) tests on d –6, –5, 9, 10, 23, and 24 of the feeding trial. The latency to the first attack (physical bite or a sequence of bites) and number of attacks over the 300 s tests by resident and intruder pigs were recorded. | RAC did not affect the latency to first attack. There was a significant RAC × gender × social rank interaction for the increased likelihood of resident dominant control gilts initiating bites compared to subordinate control (272%) and subordinate RAC fed gilts (276%), but not different from dominant RAC fed gilts. At 30 s of the R-I tests, increased cumulative resident pig attacks occurred by the RAC dominant gilts (38%) and RAC subordinate gilts (42%) vs. the average frequency (11%) of the other treatments. At 300 s, higher cumulative attacks occurred by control dominant gilts (92%), RAC dominant barrows (79%), and RAC subordinate gilts (79%) compared to control subordinate gilts (46%) and barrows (54%), and RAC subordinate barrows (46%). Within RAC, the odds of biting increased for dominant resident pigs (gilts = 228%; barrows: = 185%), and subordinate barrows were 58% more likely to initiate bites than subordinate RAC fed gilts. |
Marchant-Forde et al., 2003 | 0 and 10 mg/kg | 28 | 72 | Behavior scan sampling in the home pen was conducted (every 5 min for 22 h, one time per wk) on agonistic interactions. Pigs were also subjected to weekly disturbance tests, and latency to lie down after disturbance was recorded. | RAC had no effects on agonistic behaviors. |
Schaefer et al., 1992 | 0, 15, and 20 mg/kg | 25–36 | 86 | Behavior scan sampling in the home pen was conducted on Lacombe bred gilts and barrows every 5 min (between 0800 and 1200 h) for the frequency of the following for agonistic behaviors: parallel pressing. Reverse parallel pressing, head-to-head knocks, head-to-body knocks, biting, and replacing another pig. | RAC and gender had no effects on agonistic behaviors. |
Authors . | RAC dose . | Duration, d . | Pigs, # . | Methodology . | Results . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rocha et al., 2013 | 0 and 7.5 mg/kg | 28 | 1488 | Continuous observation of agonistic behaviors during the first hour of lairage was conducted on the number and duration of fights (a sequence of 2 or more pigs biting, head knocking, pushing, and shoving lasting greater than 3 s). Skin damage and bruising were evaluated using a 5-point photographic scale) in the cooler the d of slaughter. | RAC fed immune-castrates had 4 more fights than non-RAC immune-castrates, and 10 more fights than RAC fed surgical castrates (P < 0.05). RAC pigs fought for shorter durations (5 s; P = 0.05) than control pigs. RAC had no effect on overall skin damage score. |
Athayde et al., 2013 | 0, 5, and 10 mg/kg | 28 | 90 | The number of skin and carcass lesions were evaluated on the shoulder, loin, and ham of pigs before loading, after unloading, during lairage, and 24 h after slaughter. | RAC and gender had no effects on the total number of skin or carcass lesions. |
Poletto et al., 2010a | 0 mg/kg and RAC step-up (5 mg/kg for 14 d, then 10 mg/kg for 14 d) | 28 | 32 | Continuous observation was conducted in the home pen (for 3 h periods, once per wk for 5 wk) on the number of agonistic social interactions (Offensive behaviors: bites, head knocks, pursuit, threats; Defensive behaviors: freeze, avoidance or flight) and constituent actions displayed by 2 pigs. | The average number of agonistic interactions increased (55%) in RAC fed gilts and decreased (approximately 26%) in all other RAC × Gender treatments. RAC fed gilts increased bites (96%) and pursuits (335%) per agonistic interaction vs. baseline, while decreased bites (34%) and pursuits (46%) occurred in the other RAC × Gender treatments (P < 0.001). Head knocks per agonistic interaction increased for RAC fed barrows (14%) and CON gilts (21%) vs. baseline, and decreased head knocks (20%) occurred in the other RAC × Gender treatments (P < 0.05). The total number of agonistic social interactions was not affected by RAC. |
Poletto et al., 2010b | 0 mg/kg and RAC step-up (5 mg/kg for 14 d, then 10 mg/kg for 14 d) | 28 | 32 | Dominant and subordinate pigs from each pen were subjected to six 300 s resident-intruder (R-I) tests on d –6, –5, 9, 10, 23, and 24 of the feeding trial. The latency to the first attack (physical bite or a sequence of bites) and number of attacks over the 300 s tests by resident and intruder pigs were recorded. | RAC did not affect the latency to first attack. There was a significant RAC × gender × social rank interaction for the increased likelihood of resident dominant control gilts initiating bites compared to subordinate control (272%) and subordinate RAC fed gilts (276%), but not different from dominant RAC fed gilts. At 30 s of the R-I tests, increased cumulative resident pig attacks occurred by the RAC dominant gilts (38%) and RAC subordinate gilts (42%) vs. the average frequency (11%) of the other treatments. At 300 s, higher cumulative attacks occurred by control dominant gilts (92%), RAC dominant barrows (79%), and RAC subordinate gilts (79%) compared to control subordinate gilts (46%) and barrows (54%), and RAC subordinate barrows (46%). Within RAC, the odds of biting increased for dominant resident pigs (gilts = 228%; barrows: = 185%), and subordinate barrows were 58% more likely to initiate bites than subordinate RAC fed gilts. |
Marchant-Forde et al., 2003 | 0 and 10 mg/kg | 28 | 72 | Behavior scan sampling in the home pen was conducted (every 5 min for 22 h, one time per wk) on agonistic interactions. Pigs were also subjected to weekly disturbance tests, and latency to lie down after disturbance was recorded. | RAC had no effects on agonistic behaviors. |
Schaefer et al., 1992 | 0, 15, and 20 mg/kg | 25–36 | 86 | Behavior scan sampling in the home pen was conducted on Lacombe bred gilts and barrows every 5 min (between 0800 and 1200 h) for the frequency of the following for agonistic behaviors: parallel pressing. Reverse parallel pressing, head-to-head knocks, head-to-body knocks, biting, and replacing another pig. | RAC and gender had no effects on agonistic behaviors. |
Authors . | RAC dose . | Duration, d . | Pigs, # . | Methodology . | Results . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rocha et al., 2013 | 0 and 7.5 mg/kg | 28 | 1488 | Continuous observation of agonistic behaviors during the first hour of lairage was conducted on the number and duration of fights (a sequence of 2 or more pigs biting, head knocking, pushing, and shoving lasting greater than 3 s). Skin damage and bruising were evaluated using a 5-point photographic scale) in the cooler the d of slaughter. | RAC fed immune-castrates had 4 more fights than non-RAC immune-castrates, and 10 more fights than RAC fed surgical castrates (P < 0.05). RAC pigs fought for shorter durations (5 s; P = 0.05) than control pigs. RAC had no effect on overall skin damage score. |
Athayde et al., 2013 | 0, 5, and 10 mg/kg | 28 | 90 | The number of skin and carcass lesions were evaluated on the shoulder, loin, and ham of pigs before loading, after unloading, during lairage, and 24 h after slaughter. | RAC and gender had no effects on the total number of skin or carcass lesions. |
Poletto et al., 2010a | 0 mg/kg and RAC step-up (5 mg/kg for 14 d, then 10 mg/kg for 14 d) | 28 | 32 | Continuous observation was conducted in the home pen (for 3 h periods, once per wk for 5 wk) on the number of agonistic social interactions (Offensive behaviors: bites, head knocks, pursuit, threats; Defensive behaviors: freeze, avoidance or flight) and constituent actions displayed by 2 pigs. | The average number of agonistic interactions increased (55%) in RAC fed gilts and decreased (approximately 26%) in all other RAC × Gender treatments. RAC fed gilts increased bites (96%) and pursuits (335%) per agonistic interaction vs. baseline, while decreased bites (34%) and pursuits (46%) occurred in the other RAC × Gender treatments (P < 0.001). Head knocks per agonistic interaction increased for RAC fed barrows (14%) and CON gilts (21%) vs. baseline, and decreased head knocks (20%) occurred in the other RAC × Gender treatments (P < 0.05). The total number of agonistic social interactions was not affected by RAC. |
Poletto et al., 2010b | 0 mg/kg and RAC step-up (5 mg/kg for 14 d, then 10 mg/kg for 14 d) | 28 | 32 | Dominant and subordinate pigs from each pen were subjected to six 300 s resident-intruder (R-I) tests on d –6, –5, 9, 10, 23, and 24 of the feeding trial. The latency to the first attack (physical bite or a sequence of bites) and number of attacks over the 300 s tests by resident and intruder pigs were recorded. | RAC did not affect the latency to first attack. There was a significant RAC × gender × social rank interaction for the increased likelihood of resident dominant control gilts initiating bites compared to subordinate control (272%) and subordinate RAC fed gilts (276%), but not different from dominant RAC fed gilts. At 30 s of the R-I tests, increased cumulative resident pig attacks occurred by the RAC dominant gilts (38%) and RAC subordinate gilts (42%) vs. the average frequency (11%) of the other treatments. At 300 s, higher cumulative attacks occurred by control dominant gilts (92%), RAC dominant barrows (79%), and RAC subordinate gilts (79%) compared to control subordinate gilts (46%) and barrows (54%), and RAC subordinate barrows (46%). Within RAC, the odds of biting increased for dominant resident pigs (gilts = 228%; barrows: = 185%), and subordinate barrows were 58% more likely to initiate bites than subordinate RAC fed gilts. |
Marchant-Forde et al., 2003 | 0 and 10 mg/kg | 28 | 72 | Behavior scan sampling in the home pen was conducted (every 5 min for 22 h, one time per wk) on agonistic interactions. Pigs were also subjected to weekly disturbance tests, and latency to lie down after disturbance was recorded. | RAC had no effects on agonistic behaviors. |
Schaefer et al., 1992 | 0, 15, and 20 mg/kg | 25–36 | 86 | Behavior scan sampling in the home pen was conducted on Lacombe bred gilts and barrows every 5 min (between 0800 and 1200 h) for the frequency of the following for agonistic behaviors: parallel pressing. Reverse parallel pressing, head-to-head knocks, head-to-body knocks, biting, and replacing another pig. | RAC and gender had no effects on agonistic behaviors. |
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.