Table 4.

Effects of ractopamine (RAC) and U.S. region on the rate of transport losses from loading at the farm to stunning at the packing plant1

RAC doseP–values
Transport losses20 mg/kg5 mg/kg10 mg/kg0 vs. 50 vs. 10
Midwest Region
    Number of pigs loaded557755805568
    Fatigued, %0.861.661.320.010.10
    Injured, %0.260.530.590.050.03
    Dead, %0.150.380.330.050.12
    Total transport losses, %1.332.632.26< 0.0010.01
Southeast Region
    Number of pigs loaded579557785776
    Fatigued, %0.630.480.610.400.93
    Injured, %0.430.300.610.350.28
    Dead, %0.210.120.320.330.35
    Total transport losses, %1.350.851.550.070.58
RAC doseP–values
Transport losses20 mg/kg5 mg/kg10 mg/kg0 vs. 50 vs. 10
Midwest Region
    Number of pigs loaded557755805568
    Fatigued, %0.861.661.320.010.10
    Injured, %0.260.530.590.050.03
    Dead, %0.150.380.330.050.12
    Total transport losses, %1.332.632.26< 0.0010.01
Southeast Region
    Number of pigs loaded579557785776
    Fatigued, %0.630.480.610.400.93
    Injured, %0.430.300.610.350.28
    Dead, %0.210.120.320.330.35
    Total transport losses, %1.350.851.550.070.58

1Adapted from Swan et al. (2007).

2Transport loss classifications during loading at the farm, unloading, and moving through the plant included fatigued (defined as pig that became unwilling or unable to move in response to the handler's inputs for no physically apparent reason (i.e. no obvious reason), injured (defined as a pig that was recumbent and unwilling to move due to an obvious injury such as a broken leg or trauma), and total transport losses (included all fatigued, injured, and dead pigs recorded during transportation procedures).

Table 4.

Effects of ractopamine (RAC) and U.S. region on the rate of transport losses from loading at the farm to stunning at the packing plant1

RAC doseP–values
Transport losses20 mg/kg5 mg/kg10 mg/kg0 vs. 50 vs. 10
Midwest Region
    Number of pigs loaded557755805568
    Fatigued, %0.861.661.320.010.10
    Injured, %0.260.530.590.050.03
    Dead, %0.150.380.330.050.12
    Total transport losses, %1.332.632.26< 0.0010.01
Southeast Region
    Number of pigs loaded579557785776
    Fatigued, %0.630.480.610.400.93
    Injured, %0.430.300.610.350.28
    Dead, %0.210.120.320.330.35
    Total transport losses, %1.350.851.550.070.58
RAC doseP–values
Transport losses20 mg/kg5 mg/kg10 mg/kg0 vs. 50 vs. 10
Midwest Region
    Number of pigs loaded557755805568
    Fatigued, %0.861.661.320.010.10
    Injured, %0.260.530.590.050.03
    Dead, %0.150.380.330.050.12
    Total transport losses, %1.332.632.26< 0.0010.01
Southeast Region
    Number of pigs loaded579557785776
    Fatigued, %0.630.480.610.400.93
    Injured, %0.430.300.610.350.28
    Dead, %0.210.120.320.330.35
    Total transport losses, %1.350.851.550.070.58

1Adapted from Swan et al. (2007).

2Transport loss classifications during loading at the farm, unloading, and moving through the plant included fatigued (defined as pig that became unwilling or unable to move in response to the handler's inputs for no physically apparent reason (i.e. no obvious reason), injured (defined as a pig that was recumbent and unwilling to move due to an obvious injury such as a broken leg or trauma), and total transport losses (included all fatigued, injured, and dead pigs recorded during transportation procedures).

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close