Parameter estimates and 95% confidence intervals for Poisson generalized linear mixed effects models explaining the abundance of all mosquito species, and Aedes sierrensis, separated by sex, across suburban habitats in Salt Lake City, UT
Species . | Parameter . | Estimate . | 95% CI Lower limit . | 95% CI Upper limit . |
---|---|---|---|---|
All species | Mosquito Magnet | 2.593 | 1.117 | 5.961 |
Females | BG Bowl + Lure | 0.461 | 0.282 | 0.717 |
BGS + CO2 + Lure | 8.174 | 6.668 | 10.094 | |
BGS + Lure | 0.432 | 0.258 | 0.684 | |
Rainfall | 0.787 | 0.710 | 0.871 | |
Temperature | 0.524 | 0.463 | 0.591 | |
Location SD | 0.506 | |||
All species | Mosquito Magnet | 1.191 | 0.603 | 2.279 |
Males | BG Bowl + Lure | 0.050 | 0.015 | 0.131 |
BGS + CO2 + Lure | 0.627 | 0.442 | 0.962 | |
BGS + Lure | 0.063 | 0.022 | 0.154 | |
Rainfall | 0.261 | 0.197 | 0.337 | |
Temperature | 0.175 | 0.124 | 0.238 | |
Location SD | 0.362 | |||
Ae. sierrensis | Mosquito Magnet | 0.413 | 0.084 | 1.823 |
Females | BG Bowl + Lure | 0.020 | 0.003 | 0.279 |
BGS + CO2 + Lure | 0.413 | 0.268 | 2.721 | |
BGS + Lure | 0.010 | 0.001 | 0.200 | |
Rainfall | 0.451 | 0.333 | 0.600 | |
Temperature | 0.177 | 0.107 | 0.273 | |
Location SD | 0.875 | |||
Ae. sierrensis | Mosquito Magnet | 0.692 | 0.307 | 1.489 |
Males | BG Bowl + Lure | 0.0074 | 0.0004 | 0.0330 |
BGS + CO2 + Lure | 0.331 | 0.230 | 0.469 | |
BGS + Lure | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
Rainfall | 0.192 | 0.138 | 0.258 | |
Temperature | 0.090 | 0.054 | 0.139 | |
Location SD | 0.419 |
Species . | Parameter . | Estimate . | 95% CI Lower limit . | 95% CI Upper limit . |
---|---|---|---|---|
All species | Mosquito Magnet | 2.593 | 1.117 | 5.961 |
Females | BG Bowl + Lure | 0.461 | 0.282 | 0.717 |
BGS + CO2 + Lure | 8.174 | 6.668 | 10.094 | |
BGS + Lure | 0.432 | 0.258 | 0.684 | |
Rainfall | 0.787 | 0.710 | 0.871 | |
Temperature | 0.524 | 0.463 | 0.591 | |
Location SD | 0.506 | |||
All species | Mosquito Magnet | 1.191 | 0.603 | 2.279 |
Males | BG Bowl + Lure | 0.050 | 0.015 | 0.131 |
BGS + CO2 + Lure | 0.627 | 0.442 | 0.962 | |
BGS + Lure | 0.063 | 0.022 | 0.154 | |
Rainfall | 0.261 | 0.197 | 0.337 | |
Temperature | 0.175 | 0.124 | 0.238 | |
Location SD | 0.362 | |||
Ae. sierrensis | Mosquito Magnet | 0.413 | 0.084 | 1.823 |
Females | BG Bowl + Lure | 0.020 | 0.003 | 0.279 |
BGS + CO2 + Lure | 0.413 | 0.268 | 2.721 | |
BGS + Lure | 0.010 | 0.001 | 0.200 | |
Rainfall | 0.451 | 0.333 | 0.600 | |
Temperature | 0.177 | 0.107 | 0.273 | |
Location SD | 0.875 | |||
Ae. sierrensis | Mosquito Magnet | 0.692 | 0.307 | 1.489 |
Males | BG Bowl + Lure | 0.0074 | 0.0004 | 0.0330 |
BGS + CO2 + Lure | 0.331 | 0.230 | 0.469 | |
BGS + Lure | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
Rainfall | 0.192 | 0.138 | 0.258 | |
Temperature | 0.090 | 0.054 | 0.139 | |
Location SD | 0.419 |
Models were a function of trap type, temperature, and rainfall. Location SD is the parameter estimate for the random effect of the study locations.
Parameter estimates and 95% confidence intervals for Poisson generalized linear mixed effects models explaining the abundance of all mosquito species, and Aedes sierrensis, separated by sex, across suburban habitats in Salt Lake City, UT
Species . | Parameter . | Estimate . | 95% CI Lower limit . | 95% CI Upper limit . |
---|---|---|---|---|
All species | Mosquito Magnet | 2.593 | 1.117 | 5.961 |
Females | BG Bowl + Lure | 0.461 | 0.282 | 0.717 |
BGS + CO2 + Lure | 8.174 | 6.668 | 10.094 | |
BGS + Lure | 0.432 | 0.258 | 0.684 | |
Rainfall | 0.787 | 0.710 | 0.871 | |
Temperature | 0.524 | 0.463 | 0.591 | |
Location SD | 0.506 | |||
All species | Mosquito Magnet | 1.191 | 0.603 | 2.279 |
Males | BG Bowl + Lure | 0.050 | 0.015 | 0.131 |
BGS + CO2 + Lure | 0.627 | 0.442 | 0.962 | |
BGS + Lure | 0.063 | 0.022 | 0.154 | |
Rainfall | 0.261 | 0.197 | 0.337 | |
Temperature | 0.175 | 0.124 | 0.238 | |
Location SD | 0.362 | |||
Ae. sierrensis | Mosquito Magnet | 0.413 | 0.084 | 1.823 |
Females | BG Bowl + Lure | 0.020 | 0.003 | 0.279 |
BGS + CO2 + Lure | 0.413 | 0.268 | 2.721 | |
BGS + Lure | 0.010 | 0.001 | 0.200 | |
Rainfall | 0.451 | 0.333 | 0.600 | |
Temperature | 0.177 | 0.107 | 0.273 | |
Location SD | 0.875 | |||
Ae. sierrensis | Mosquito Magnet | 0.692 | 0.307 | 1.489 |
Males | BG Bowl + Lure | 0.0074 | 0.0004 | 0.0330 |
BGS + CO2 + Lure | 0.331 | 0.230 | 0.469 | |
BGS + Lure | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
Rainfall | 0.192 | 0.138 | 0.258 | |
Temperature | 0.090 | 0.054 | 0.139 | |
Location SD | 0.419 |
Species . | Parameter . | Estimate . | 95% CI Lower limit . | 95% CI Upper limit . |
---|---|---|---|---|
All species | Mosquito Magnet | 2.593 | 1.117 | 5.961 |
Females | BG Bowl + Lure | 0.461 | 0.282 | 0.717 |
BGS + CO2 + Lure | 8.174 | 6.668 | 10.094 | |
BGS + Lure | 0.432 | 0.258 | 0.684 | |
Rainfall | 0.787 | 0.710 | 0.871 | |
Temperature | 0.524 | 0.463 | 0.591 | |
Location SD | 0.506 | |||
All species | Mosquito Magnet | 1.191 | 0.603 | 2.279 |
Males | BG Bowl + Lure | 0.050 | 0.015 | 0.131 |
BGS + CO2 + Lure | 0.627 | 0.442 | 0.962 | |
BGS + Lure | 0.063 | 0.022 | 0.154 | |
Rainfall | 0.261 | 0.197 | 0.337 | |
Temperature | 0.175 | 0.124 | 0.238 | |
Location SD | 0.362 | |||
Ae. sierrensis | Mosquito Magnet | 0.413 | 0.084 | 1.823 |
Females | BG Bowl + Lure | 0.020 | 0.003 | 0.279 |
BGS + CO2 + Lure | 0.413 | 0.268 | 2.721 | |
BGS + Lure | 0.010 | 0.001 | 0.200 | |
Rainfall | 0.451 | 0.333 | 0.600 | |
Temperature | 0.177 | 0.107 | 0.273 | |
Location SD | 0.875 | |||
Ae. sierrensis | Mosquito Magnet | 0.692 | 0.307 | 1.489 |
Males | BG Bowl + Lure | 0.0074 | 0.0004 | 0.0330 |
BGS + CO2 + Lure | 0.331 | 0.230 | 0.469 | |
BGS + Lure | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
Rainfall | 0.192 | 0.138 | 0.258 | |
Temperature | 0.090 | 0.054 | 0.139 | |
Location SD | 0.419 |
Models were a function of trap type, temperature, and rainfall. Location SD is the parameter estimate for the random effect of the study locations.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.