Table 3.

1σ marginalized per cent errors on f from the MCMC analyses at z = 0.5 and z = 1. We utilize the monopole and quadrupole up to the kmax given in Table 1, and the hexadecapole up to |$k_{\rm max,4} = 0.129 \, h\, {\rm Mpc}^{-1}$| for TNS and |$k_{\rm max,4} = 0.245 \, h\, {\rm Mpc}^{-1}$| for EFTofLSS at z = 0.5, while |$k_{\rm max,4} =0.05 \, h\, {\rm Mpc}^{-1}$| for TNS and |$k_{\rm max,4} =0.16 \, h\, {\rm Mpc}^{-1}$| for EFTofLSS at z = 1.

TNS LorEFTofLSS
zP0 + P2+P4|$+10\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$| priorP0 + P2+P4|$+10\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$| prior
0.5|$3.6\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$||$3.2\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$||$3.5 \,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$||$2.8\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$||$1.8\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$||$2.1\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$|
1|$3.0\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$||$2.6\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$||$2.5\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$||$2.0\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$||$1.8\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$||$1.7\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$|
TNS LorEFTofLSS
zP0 + P2+P4|$+10\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$| priorP0 + P2+P4|$+10\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$| prior
0.5|$3.6\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$||$3.2\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$||$3.5 \,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$||$2.8\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$||$1.8\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$||$2.1\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$|
1|$3.0\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$||$2.6\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$||$2.5\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$||$2.0\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$||$1.8\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$||$1.7\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$|
Table 3.

1σ marginalized per cent errors on f from the MCMC analyses at z = 0.5 and z = 1. We utilize the monopole and quadrupole up to the kmax given in Table 1, and the hexadecapole up to |$k_{\rm max,4} = 0.129 \, h\, {\rm Mpc}^{-1}$| for TNS and |$k_{\rm max,4} = 0.245 \, h\, {\rm Mpc}^{-1}$| for EFTofLSS at z = 0.5, while |$k_{\rm max,4} =0.05 \, h\, {\rm Mpc}^{-1}$| for TNS and |$k_{\rm max,4} =0.16 \, h\, {\rm Mpc}^{-1}$| for EFTofLSS at z = 1.

TNS LorEFTofLSS
zP0 + P2+P4|$+10\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$| priorP0 + P2+P4|$+10\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$| prior
0.5|$3.6\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$||$3.2\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$||$3.5 \,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$||$2.8\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$||$1.8\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$||$2.1\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$|
1|$3.0\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$||$2.6\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$||$2.5\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$||$2.0\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$||$1.8\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$||$1.7\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$|
TNS LorEFTofLSS
zP0 + P2+P4|$+10\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$| priorP0 + P2+P4|$+10\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$| prior
0.5|$3.6\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$||$3.2\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$||$3.5 \,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$||$2.8\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$||$1.8\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$||$2.1\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$|
1|$3.0\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$||$2.6\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$||$2.5\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$||$2.0\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$||$1.8\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$||$1.7\,\mathrm{ per}\,\mathrm{ cent}$|
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close