Compared models . | ΔAIC . | P . |
---|---|---|
Models 1 and 2 | 44 | <2e−16* |
Models 2 and 3 | 0.4 | >0.1 |
Models 2 and 4 | 18 | <6e−6* |
Models 4 and 5 | 8 | <0.005* |
Compared models . | ΔAIC . | P . |
---|---|---|
Models 1 and 2 | 44 | <2e−16* |
Models 2 and 3 | 0.4 | >0.1 |
Models 2 and 4 | 18 | <6e−6* |
Models 4 and 5 | 8 | <0.005* |
*Probability of the higher order model of being better than the previous model, P indicates P values in ANOVA comparison; ΔAIC indicates difference of AIC values.
Compared models . | ΔAIC . | P . |
---|---|---|
Models 1 and 2 | 44 | <2e−16* |
Models 2 and 3 | 0.4 | >0.1 |
Models 2 and 4 | 18 | <6e−6* |
Models 4 and 5 | 8 | <0.005* |
Compared models . | ΔAIC . | P . |
---|---|---|
Models 1 and 2 | 44 | <2e−16* |
Models 2 and 3 | 0.4 | >0.1 |
Models 2 and 4 | 18 | <6e−6* |
Models 4 and 5 | 8 | <0.005* |
*Probability of the higher order model of being better than the previous model, P indicates P values in ANOVA comparison; ΔAIC indicates difference of AIC values.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.