Positions relative to the BCG of those galaxies for which the surface brightness distribution was modelled with a Sérsic profile and then subtracted for the hybrid modelling.
. | x(arcsec) . | y(arcsec) . |
---|---|---|
BCG | 0 | 0 |
G1 | −3.6 | −4.6 |
G2 | 3.2 | −11.1 |
G3 | 0.5 | −1.6 |
G4 | 2.6 | 1.4 |
G5 | −17.6 | 12.9 |
G6 | −13.8 | 12.5 |
G7 | −7.6 | −2.3 |
Star | 5.1 | −17.2 |
. | x(arcsec) . | y(arcsec) . |
---|---|---|
BCG | 0 | 0 |
G1 | −3.6 | −4.6 |
G2 | 3.2 | −11.1 |
G3 | 0.5 | −1.6 |
G4 | 2.6 | 1.4 |
G5 | −17.6 | 12.9 |
G6 | −13.8 | 12.5 |
G7 | −7.6 | −2.3 |
Star | 5.1 | −17.2 |
Positions relative to the BCG of those galaxies for which the surface brightness distribution was modelled with a Sérsic profile and then subtracted for the hybrid modelling.
. | x(arcsec) . | y(arcsec) . |
---|---|---|
BCG | 0 | 0 |
G1 | −3.6 | −4.6 |
G2 | 3.2 | −11.1 |
G3 | 0.5 | −1.6 |
G4 | 2.6 | 1.4 |
G5 | −17.6 | 12.9 |
G6 | −13.8 | 12.5 |
G7 | −7.6 | −2.3 |
Star | 5.1 | −17.2 |
. | x(arcsec) . | y(arcsec) . |
---|---|---|
BCG | 0 | 0 |
G1 | −3.6 | −4.6 |
G2 | 3.2 | −11.1 |
G3 | 0.5 | −1.6 |
G4 | 2.6 | 1.4 |
G5 | −17.6 | 12.9 |
G6 | −13.8 | 12.5 |
G7 | −7.6 | −2.3 |
Star | 5.1 | −17.2 |
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.