Table 7.

Best fit for the z ∼ 1 MZ relation.

log (MTO/M)12  + log (O/H)asmγ
(1)(2)(3)
|$8.74^{+0.43}_{-0.83}$||$8.45^{+0.15}_{-0.25}$||$0.59^{+0.15}_{-0.21}$|
8.901a|$8.51^{+0.06}_{-0.05}$||$0.59^{+0.09}_{-0.09}$|
log (MTO/M)12  + log (O/H)asmγ
(1)(2)(3)
|$8.74^{+0.43}_{-0.83}$||$8.45^{+0.15}_{-0.25}$||$0.59^{+0.15}_{-0.21}$|
8.901a|$8.51^{+0.06}_{-0.05}$||$0.59^{+0.09}_{-0.09}$|

Notes. Fitting parameters of the MZ relation: (1) turnover mass, (2) asymptotic metallicity at the high stellar mass end, and (3) slope at the low-mass end. Uncertainties are reported at the 16th and 84th percentile, and are determined from the probability functions marginalized over the other two fitting parameters.

aMTO was held fixed to the value determined by AM13.

Table 7.

Best fit for the z ∼ 1 MZ relation.

log (MTO/M)12  + log (O/H)asmγ
(1)(2)(3)
|$8.74^{+0.43}_{-0.83}$||$8.45^{+0.15}_{-0.25}$||$0.59^{+0.15}_{-0.21}$|
8.901a|$8.51^{+0.06}_{-0.05}$||$0.59^{+0.09}_{-0.09}$|
log (MTO/M)12  + log (O/H)asmγ
(1)(2)(3)
|$8.74^{+0.43}_{-0.83}$||$8.45^{+0.15}_{-0.25}$||$0.59^{+0.15}_{-0.21}$|
8.901a|$8.51^{+0.06}_{-0.05}$||$0.59^{+0.09}_{-0.09}$|

Notes. Fitting parameters of the MZ relation: (1) turnover mass, (2) asymptotic metallicity at the high stellar mass end, and (3) slope at the low-mass end. Uncertainties are reported at the 16th and 84th percentile, and are determined from the probability functions marginalized over the other two fitting parameters.

aMTO was held fixed to the value determined by AM13.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close