log (MTO/M⊙) . | 12 + log (O/H)asm . | γ . |
---|---|---|
(1) . | (2) . | (3) . |
|$8.74^{+0.43}_{-0.83}$| | |$8.45^{+0.15}_{-0.25}$| | |$0.59^{+0.15}_{-0.21}$| |
8.901a | |$8.51^{+0.06}_{-0.05}$| | |$0.59^{+0.09}_{-0.09}$| |
log (MTO/M⊙) . | 12 + log (O/H)asm . | γ . |
---|---|---|
(1) . | (2) . | (3) . |
|$8.74^{+0.43}_{-0.83}$| | |$8.45^{+0.15}_{-0.25}$| | |$0.59^{+0.15}_{-0.21}$| |
8.901a | |$8.51^{+0.06}_{-0.05}$| | |$0.59^{+0.09}_{-0.09}$| |
Notes. Fitting parameters of the M⋆–Z relation: (1) turnover mass, (2) asymptotic metallicity at the high stellar mass end, and (3) slope at the low-mass end. Uncertainties are reported at the 16th and 84th percentile, and are determined from the probability functions marginalized over the other two fitting parameters.
aMTO was held fixed to the value determined by AM13.
log (MTO/M⊙) . | 12 + log (O/H)asm . | γ . |
---|---|---|
(1) . | (2) . | (3) . |
|$8.74^{+0.43}_{-0.83}$| | |$8.45^{+0.15}_{-0.25}$| | |$0.59^{+0.15}_{-0.21}$| |
8.901a | |$8.51^{+0.06}_{-0.05}$| | |$0.59^{+0.09}_{-0.09}$| |
log (MTO/M⊙) . | 12 + log (O/H)asm . | γ . |
---|---|---|
(1) . | (2) . | (3) . |
|$8.74^{+0.43}_{-0.83}$| | |$8.45^{+0.15}_{-0.25}$| | |$0.59^{+0.15}_{-0.21}$| |
8.901a | |$8.51^{+0.06}_{-0.05}$| | |$0.59^{+0.09}_{-0.09}$| |
Notes. Fitting parameters of the M⋆–Z relation: (1) turnover mass, (2) asymptotic metallicity at the high stellar mass end, and (3) slope at the low-mass end. Uncertainties are reported at the 16th and 84th percentile, and are determined from the probability functions marginalized over the other two fitting parameters.
aMTO was held fixed to the value determined by AM13.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.