Table 2

Symptomatic outcomes grouped by treatment allocation

Placebo, n (%)Atomoxetine, n (%)Total
Asymptomatic6 (22)6 (21)12
Isolated presyncope2 (7)13 (45)15
Syncope19 (70)10 (34)29
Total27 (100)29 (100)56
Placebo, n (%)Atomoxetine, n (%)Total
Asymptomatic6 (22)6 (21)12
Isolated presyncope2 (7)13 (45)15
Syncope19 (70)10 (34)29
Total27 (100)29 (100)56

P = 0.003 by Fisher’s exact with Halton–Freeman extension. Of 15 subjects with presyncope as an outcome 87% had received atomoxetine. The relative risk reduction for syncope was 0.49 (confidence interval 0.28–0.86, P = 0.012). Percentages in the individual subgroups within the placebo arm do not add up to 100% due to rounding.

Table 2

Symptomatic outcomes grouped by treatment allocation

Placebo, n (%)Atomoxetine, n (%)Total
Asymptomatic6 (22)6 (21)12
Isolated presyncope2 (7)13 (45)15
Syncope19 (70)10 (34)29
Total27 (100)29 (100)56
Placebo, n (%)Atomoxetine, n (%)Total
Asymptomatic6 (22)6 (21)12
Isolated presyncope2 (7)13 (45)15
Syncope19 (70)10 (34)29
Total27 (100)29 (100)56

P = 0.003 by Fisher’s exact with Halton–Freeman extension. Of 15 subjects with presyncope as an outcome 87% had received atomoxetine. The relative risk reduction for syncope was 0.49 (confidence interval 0.28–0.86, P = 0.012). Percentages in the individual subgroups within the placebo arm do not add up to 100% due to rounding.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close