Table 3
Open in new tab

Comparison between Bazett and Fridericia formulae and respective differences at each time-point of the study

QTc Bazett vs. FridericiaBaselineMid-term FULong-term FU
Mean difference (ms) and 95% CI (ms)25 ± 11 (24–25)24 ± 11 (23–24)23 ± 11 (22–23)
P-valueP < 0.0001P < 0.0001P < 0.0001
QTc Bazett vs. FridericiaBaselineMid-term FULong-term FU
Mean difference (ms) and 95% CI (ms)25 ± 11 (24–25)24 ± 11 (23–24)23 ± 11 (22–23)
P-valueP < 0.0001P < 0.0001P < 0.0001

CI, confidence interval; FU, follow-up.

Table 3
Open in new tab

Comparison between Bazett and Fridericia formulae and respective differences at each time-point of the study

QTc Bazett vs. FridericiaBaselineMid-term FULong-term FU
Mean difference (ms) and 95% CI (ms)25 ± 11 (24–25)24 ± 11 (23–24)23 ± 11 (22–23)
P-valueP < 0.0001P < 0.0001P < 0.0001
QTc Bazett vs. FridericiaBaselineMid-term FULong-term FU
Mean difference (ms) and 95% CI (ms)25 ± 11 (24–25)24 ± 11 (23–24)23 ± 11 (22–23)
P-valueP < 0.0001P < 0.0001P < 0.0001

CI, confidence interval; FU, follow-up.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close