Table 1

Output from LMMs (A,B) and GLMMs (C,D) investigating whether the significant difference in grooming bout duration was driven by individuals of different dominance status or sex (A,B) and whether the significant difference in sentinel occurrence was driven by individuals of different dominance status or sex (C,D)

Fixed effectEstimate ± SEdfχ2P
(A) Mean grooming bout duration by dominance status
Random termsGroup ID1.328 ± 1.153
Individual ID in Group6.113 ± 2.472
Minimal model(Intercept)18.423 ± 1.520
Trial7.164 ± 1.949113.514<0.001
Dropped termsTrial:Status10.3480.560
Status10.0220.884
(B) Mean grooming bout duration by sex
Random termsGroup ID1.328 ± 1.153
Individual ID in Group6.113 ± 2.472
Minimal model(Intercept)18.423 ± 1.520
Trial7.164 ± 1.949113.514<0.001
Dropped termsTrial:Sex10.0010.973
Sex10.1340.718
(C) Proportion of scan samples with a sentinel present by dominance status
Random termsGroup ID0.421 ± 0.649
Individual ID in Group0.002 ± 0.043
Minimal model(Intercept)3.111 ± 0.284
Trial1.837 ± 0.2111100.462<0.001
Status0.956 ± 0.28719.7170.002
Dropped termsTrial:Status 10.9010.343
(D) Proportion of scan samples with a sentinel present by sex
Random termsGroup ID0.636 ± 0.797
Individual ID in Group0.000 ± 0.000
Minimal model(Intercept)3.769 ± 0.002
Trial1.836 ± 0.0021100.400<0.001
Dropped termsTrial:Sex11.8150.178
Sex10.9560.328
Fixed effectEstimate ± SEdfχ2P
(A) Mean grooming bout duration by dominance status
Random termsGroup ID1.328 ± 1.153
Individual ID in Group6.113 ± 2.472
Minimal model(Intercept)18.423 ± 1.520
Trial7.164 ± 1.949113.514<0.001
Dropped termsTrial:Status10.3480.560
Status10.0220.884
(B) Mean grooming bout duration by sex
Random termsGroup ID1.328 ± 1.153
Individual ID in Group6.113 ± 2.472
Minimal model(Intercept)18.423 ± 1.520
Trial7.164 ± 1.949113.514<0.001
Dropped termsTrial:Sex10.0010.973
Sex10.1340.718
(C) Proportion of scan samples with a sentinel present by dominance status
Random termsGroup ID0.421 ± 0.649
Individual ID in Group0.002 ± 0.043
Minimal model(Intercept)3.111 ± 0.284
Trial1.837 ± 0.2111100.462<0.001
Status0.956 ± 0.28719.7170.002
Dropped termsTrial:Status 10.9010.343
(D) Proportion of scan samples with a sentinel present by sex
Random termsGroup ID0.636 ± 0.797
Individual ID in Group0.000 ± 0.000
Minimal model(Intercept)3.769 ± 0.002
Trial1.836 ± 0.0021100.400<0.001
Dropped termsTrial:Sex11.8150.178
Sex10.9560.328

Significant fixed terms shown in bold; variance ± SD reported for random terms (in italics).

Table 1

Output from LMMs (A,B) and GLMMs (C,D) investigating whether the significant difference in grooming bout duration was driven by individuals of different dominance status or sex (A,B) and whether the significant difference in sentinel occurrence was driven by individuals of different dominance status or sex (C,D)

Fixed effectEstimate ± SEdfχ2P
(A) Mean grooming bout duration by dominance status
Random termsGroup ID1.328 ± 1.153
Individual ID in Group6.113 ± 2.472
Minimal model(Intercept)18.423 ± 1.520
Trial7.164 ± 1.949113.514<0.001
Dropped termsTrial:Status10.3480.560
Status10.0220.884
(B) Mean grooming bout duration by sex
Random termsGroup ID1.328 ± 1.153
Individual ID in Group6.113 ± 2.472
Minimal model(Intercept)18.423 ± 1.520
Trial7.164 ± 1.949113.514<0.001
Dropped termsTrial:Sex10.0010.973
Sex10.1340.718
(C) Proportion of scan samples with a sentinel present by dominance status
Random termsGroup ID0.421 ± 0.649
Individual ID in Group0.002 ± 0.043
Minimal model(Intercept)3.111 ± 0.284
Trial1.837 ± 0.2111100.462<0.001
Status0.956 ± 0.28719.7170.002
Dropped termsTrial:Status 10.9010.343
(D) Proportion of scan samples with a sentinel present by sex
Random termsGroup ID0.636 ± 0.797
Individual ID in Group0.000 ± 0.000
Minimal model(Intercept)3.769 ± 0.002
Trial1.836 ± 0.0021100.400<0.001
Dropped termsTrial:Sex11.8150.178
Sex10.9560.328
Fixed effectEstimate ± SEdfχ2P
(A) Mean grooming bout duration by dominance status
Random termsGroup ID1.328 ± 1.153
Individual ID in Group6.113 ± 2.472
Minimal model(Intercept)18.423 ± 1.520
Trial7.164 ± 1.949113.514<0.001
Dropped termsTrial:Status10.3480.560
Status10.0220.884
(B) Mean grooming bout duration by sex
Random termsGroup ID1.328 ± 1.153
Individual ID in Group6.113 ± 2.472
Minimal model(Intercept)18.423 ± 1.520
Trial7.164 ± 1.949113.514<0.001
Dropped termsTrial:Sex10.0010.973
Sex10.1340.718
(C) Proportion of scan samples with a sentinel present by dominance status
Random termsGroup ID0.421 ± 0.649
Individual ID in Group0.002 ± 0.043
Minimal model(Intercept)3.111 ± 0.284
Trial1.837 ± 0.2111100.462<0.001
Status0.956 ± 0.28719.7170.002
Dropped termsTrial:Status 10.9010.343
(D) Proportion of scan samples with a sentinel present by sex
Random termsGroup ID0.636 ± 0.797
Individual ID in Group0.000 ± 0.000
Minimal model(Intercept)3.769 ± 0.002
Trial1.836 ± 0.0021100.400<0.001
Dropped termsTrial:Sex11.8150.178
Sex10.9560.328

Significant fixed terms shown in bold; variance ± SD reported for random terms (in italics).

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close