About 56% of women received WIC benefits during pregnancy (Table 1), and about 40% delivered before October 2009, when the revised food packages were available. Compared with nonrecipients, WIC recipients were more likely to be black, unmarried, younger, less educated, and lower income, with worse nutritional status. Of note, DID assumes that trends (not levels) of the outcomes were similar during the prerevision period, an assumption that we validated graphically and quantitatively (see Web Appendix 1, Web Figure 2, Web Table 2).

Table 1.

Sample Characteristics, Conditions Affecting Neurocognitive Development and Learning in Early Childhood Study, Shelby County, Tennessee, 2006–2011

CharacteristicaNo WIC in PregnancyWIC in Pregnancy
(n = 548)(n = 711)
Mean (SD)%Mean (SD)%
Mother’s age, years28.9 (4.9)24.5 (5.1)
Mother married86.138.5
Annual household income, $
 <10,0005.630.6
 10,000–24,9997.333.1
 25,000–44,99916.321.6
 45,000–74,99933.712.7
 ≥75,00037.12.0
Female child50.950.1
Race/ethnicity
 Black33.486.8
 White/otherb66.613.2
Mother’s education
 Less than high school4.214.2
 High school25.563.3
 More than high school70.322.5
No. of people in household4.1 (1.2)4.7 (1.6)
Delivered before October 200936.141.6
Child received WIC at 1 month postpartum21.287.2
Outcome variables during pregnancy
 Healthy Eating Index
  Total score64.6 (10.3)57.7 (10.9)
  Component 1: total vegetables4.0 (1.0)3.5 (1.2)
  Component 2: dark green vegetables and legumes3.9 (1.4)3.3 (1.6)
  Component 3: total fruit4.2 (1.2)4.0 (1.3)
  Component 4: whole fruit4.2 (1.2)3.7 (1.5)
  Component 5: whole grains4.8 (2.6)3.9 (2.4)
  Component 6: milk6.4 (2.5)5.7 (2.3)
  Component 7: meat and beans4.5 (0.7)4.5 (0.8)
  Component 8: seafood and plant protein3.6 (1.4)2.9 (1.5)
  Component 9: fatty acid ratio5.4 (2.4)4.8 (2.2)
  Component 10: sodium3.7 (2.2)3.8 (2.4)
  Component 11: refined grains7.7 (2.1)7.7 (2.1)
  Component 12: solid fat, excess alcohol, added sugars12.2 (3.8)9.8 (3.7)
 Nutrient densityc
  Protein38.6 (6.4)36.5 (5.9)
  Fat40.0 (5.8)41.0 (5.4)
  Carbohydrates127.8 (16.3)125.6 (16.2)
CharacteristicaNo WIC in PregnancyWIC in Pregnancy
(n = 548)(n = 711)
Mean (SD)%Mean (SD)%
Mother’s age, years28.9 (4.9)24.5 (5.1)
Mother married86.138.5
Annual household income, $
 <10,0005.630.6
 10,000–24,9997.333.1
 25,000–44,99916.321.6
 45,000–74,99933.712.7
 ≥75,00037.12.0
Female child50.950.1
Race/ethnicity
 Black33.486.8
 White/otherb66.613.2
Mother’s education
 Less than high school4.214.2
 High school25.563.3
 More than high school70.322.5
No. of people in household4.1 (1.2)4.7 (1.6)
Delivered before October 200936.141.6
Child received WIC at 1 month postpartum21.287.2
Outcome variables during pregnancy
 Healthy Eating Index
  Total score64.6 (10.3)57.7 (10.9)
  Component 1: total vegetables4.0 (1.0)3.5 (1.2)
  Component 2: dark green vegetables and legumes3.9 (1.4)3.3 (1.6)
  Component 3: total fruit4.2 (1.2)4.0 (1.3)
  Component 4: whole fruit4.2 (1.2)3.7 (1.5)
  Component 5: whole grains4.8 (2.6)3.9 (2.4)
  Component 6: milk6.4 (2.5)5.7 (2.3)
  Component 7: meat and beans4.5 (0.7)4.5 (0.8)
  Component 8: seafood and plant protein3.6 (1.4)2.9 (1.5)
  Component 9: fatty acid ratio5.4 (2.4)4.8 (2.2)
  Component 10: sodium3.7 (2.2)3.8 (2.4)
  Component 11: refined grains7.7 (2.1)7.7 (2.1)
  Component 12: solid fat, excess alcohol, added sugars12.2 (3.8)9.8 (3.7)
 Nutrient densityc
  Protein38.6 (6.4)36.5 (5.9)
  Fat40.0 (5.8)41.0 (5.4)
  Carbohydrates127.8 (16.3)125.6 (16.2)

Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; WIC, Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children.

an = 1,454 (data on WIC receipt was missing for 195 participants). Sample characteristics were calculated using unimputed data.

b Only 1.9% of sample were Hispanic or other race/ethnicity. These were included in the “white” category to avoid unstable estimates due to small cell sizes.

c Nutrient density outcomes represent grams of each nutrient × 1,000 divided by the total kcal of dietary intake per day.

Table 1.

Sample Characteristics, Conditions Affecting Neurocognitive Development and Learning in Early Childhood Study, Shelby County, Tennessee, 2006–2011

CharacteristicaNo WIC in PregnancyWIC in Pregnancy
(n = 548)(n = 711)
Mean (SD)%Mean (SD)%
Mother’s age, years28.9 (4.9)24.5 (5.1)
Mother married86.138.5
Annual household income, $
 <10,0005.630.6
 10,000–24,9997.333.1
 25,000–44,99916.321.6
 45,000–74,99933.712.7
 ≥75,00037.12.0
Female child50.950.1
Race/ethnicity
 Black33.486.8
 White/otherb66.613.2
Mother’s education
 Less than high school4.214.2
 High school25.563.3
 More than high school70.322.5
No. of people in household4.1 (1.2)4.7 (1.6)
Delivered before October 200936.141.6
Child received WIC at 1 month postpartum21.287.2
Outcome variables during pregnancy
 Healthy Eating Index
  Total score64.6 (10.3)57.7 (10.9)
  Component 1: total vegetables4.0 (1.0)3.5 (1.2)
  Component 2: dark green vegetables and legumes3.9 (1.4)3.3 (1.6)
  Component 3: total fruit4.2 (1.2)4.0 (1.3)
  Component 4: whole fruit4.2 (1.2)3.7 (1.5)
  Component 5: whole grains4.8 (2.6)3.9 (2.4)
  Component 6: milk6.4 (2.5)5.7 (2.3)
  Component 7: meat and beans4.5 (0.7)4.5 (0.8)
  Component 8: seafood and plant protein3.6 (1.4)2.9 (1.5)
  Component 9: fatty acid ratio5.4 (2.4)4.8 (2.2)
  Component 10: sodium3.7 (2.2)3.8 (2.4)
  Component 11: refined grains7.7 (2.1)7.7 (2.1)
  Component 12: solid fat, excess alcohol, added sugars12.2 (3.8)9.8 (3.7)
 Nutrient densityc
  Protein38.6 (6.4)36.5 (5.9)
  Fat40.0 (5.8)41.0 (5.4)
  Carbohydrates127.8 (16.3)125.6 (16.2)
CharacteristicaNo WIC in PregnancyWIC in Pregnancy
(n = 548)(n = 711)
Mean (SD)%Mean (SD)%
Mother’s age, years28.9 (4.9)24.5 (5.1)
Mother married86.138.5
Annual household income, $
 <10,0005.630.6
 10,000–24,9997.333.1
 25,000–44,99916.321.6
 45,000–74,99933.712.7
 ≥75,00037.12.0
Female child50.950.1
Race/ethnicity
 Black33.486.8
 White/otherb66.613.2
Mother’s education
 Less than high school4.214.2
 High school25.563.3
 More than high school70.322.5
No. of people in household4.1 (1.2)4.7 (1.6)
Delivered before October 200936.141.6
Child received WIC at 1 month postpartum21.287.2
Outcome variables during pregnancy
 Healthy Eating Index
  Total score64.6 (10.3)57.7 (10.9)
  Component 1: total vegetables4.0 (1.0)3.5 (1.2)
  Component 2: dark green vegetables and legumes3.9 (1.4)3.3 (1.6)
  Component 3: total fruit4.2 (1.2)4.0 (1.3)
  Component 4: whole fruit4.2 (1.2)3.7 (1.5)
  Component 5: whole grains4.8 (2.6)3.9 (2.4)
  Component 6: milk6.4 (2.5)5.7 (2.3)
  Component 7: meat and beans4.5 (0.7)4.5 (0.8)
  Component 8: seafood and plant protein3.6 (1.4)2.9 (1.5)
  Component 9: fatty acid ratio5.4 (2.4)4.8 (2.2)
  Component 10: sodium3.7 (2.2)3.8 (2.4)
  Component 11: refined grains7.7 (2.1)7.7 (2.1)
  Component 12: solid fat, excess alcohol, added sugars12.2 (3.8)9.8 (3.7)
 Nutrient densityc
  Protein38.6 (6.4)36.5 (5.9)
  Fat40.0 (5.8)41.0 (5.4)
  Carbohydrates127.8 (16.3)125.6 (16.2)

Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; WIC, Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children.

an = 1,454 (data on WIC receipt was missing for 195 participants). Sample characteristics were calculated using unimputed data.

b Only 1.9% of sample were Hispanic or other race/ethnicity. These were included in the “white” category to avoid unstable estimates due to small cell sizes.

c Nutrient density outcomes represent grams of each nutrient × 1,000 divided by the total kcal of dietary intake per day.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close