Table 2.

Effects of fruit heteromorphism vs. monomorphism on the incidence of naturalization (expressed as being naturalized somewhere in the world or not) and extent of naturalization (natural log-transformed number of regions where the species is naturalized) of ornamental Asteraceae species (Models 1), and effect of heteromorphism vs. monomorphism, annual/biennial vs. perennial life history, plant height and pair-wise interactions between heteromorphism and the other two traits on the same response variables (Models 2).

Response variablesIncidence of naturalizationExtent of naturalization (log)
Explanatory variablesχ2/GLMPhylo GLMR2parLMPhylo LMR2par
Models 1n = 591, R2lr =0.123n = 281, R2lr = 0.020
Fruit heteromorphism (FHM)19.26***4.100***0.0850.9310.6680.001
Models 2n = 584, R2lr = 0.179n = 279, R2lr = 0.100
FHM2.208*2.824**0.0031.1340.9220.000
Life history–4.983***–3.323***0.038–3.409***–3.317**0.052
Plant height3.532***4.007***0.107–0.0750.0990.001
FHM × life history0.5060.3420.000–0.742–0.5640.001
FHM × plant height2.223*2.976**0.0292.516*2.879**0.032
Response variablesIncidence of naturalizationExtent of naturalization (log)
Explanatory variablesχ2/GLMPhylo GLMR2parLMPhylo LMR2par
Models 1n = 591, R2lr =0.123n = 281, R2lr = 0.020
Fruit heteromorphism (FHM)19.26***4.100***0.0850.9310.6680.001
Models 2n = 584, R2lr = 0.179n = 279, R2lr = 0.100
FHM2.208*2.824**0.0031.1340.9220.000
Life history–4.983***–3.323***0.038–3.409***–3.317**0.052
Plant height3.532***4.007***0.107–0.0750.0990.001
FHM × life history0.5060.3420.000–0.742–0.5640.001
FHM × plant height2.223*2.976**0.0292.516*2.879**0.032

Pearson’s χ2 test of contingency in univariate models and generalized linear models (GLMs) in multivariate models, followed by phylogenetic logistic regressions, were used in the case of incidence of naturalization (z statistics are shown), and linear models (LMs) followed by phylogenetic linear regressions in the case of extent of naturalization (t statistics are shown) in both models.

Asterisks denote significance at *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

Total explained variance of the models (R2lr), and the partial variances explained by each variable (R2par) are also shown.

Sample size refers to the total number of species in the analysed datasets.

Table 2.

Effects of fruit heteromorphism vs. monomorphism on the incidence of naturalization (expressed as being naturalized somewhere in the world or not) and extent of naturalization (natural log-transformed number of regions where the species is naturalized) of ornamental Asteraceae species (Models 1), and effect of heteromorphism vs. monomorphism, annual/biennial vs. perennial life history, plant height and pair-wise interactions between heteromorphism and the other two traits on the same response variables (Models 2).

Response variablesIncidence of naturalizationExtent of naturalization (log)
Explanatory variablesχ2/GLMPhylo GLMR2parLMPhylo LMR2par
Models 1n = 591, R2lr =0.123n = 281, R2lr = 0.020
Fruit heteromorphism (FHM)19.26***4.100***0.0850.9310.6680.001
Models 2n = 584, R2lr = 0.179n = 279, R2lr = 0.100
FHM2.208*2.824**0.0031.1340.9220.000
Life history–4.983***–3.323***0.038–3.409***–3.317**0.052
Plant height3.532***4.007***0.107–0.0750.0990.001
FHM × life history0.5060.3420.000–0.742–0.5640.001
FHM × plant height2.223*2.976**0.0292.516*2.879**0.032
Response variablesIncidence of naturalizationExtent of naturalization (log)
Explanatory variablesχ2/GLMPhylo GLMR2parLMPhylo LMR2par
Models 1n = 591, R2lr =0.123n = 281, R2lr = 0.020
Fruit heteromorphism (FHM)19.26***4.100***0.0850.9310.6680.001
Models 2n = 584, R2lr = 0.179n = 279, R2lr = 0.100
FHM2.208*2.824**0.0031.1340.9220.000
Life history–4.983***–3.323***0.038–3.409***–3.317**0.052
Plant height3.532***4.007***0.107–0.0750.0990.001
FHM × life history0.5060.3420.000–0.742–0.5640.001
FHM × plant height2.223*2.976**0.0292.516*2.879**0.032

Pearson’s χ2 test of contingency in univariate models and generalized linear models (GLMs) in multivariate models, followed by phylogenetic logistic regressions, were used in the case of incidence of naturalization (z statistics are shown), and linear models (LMs) followed by phylogenetic linear regressions in the case of extent of naturalization (t statistics are shown) in both models.

Asterisks denote significance at *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

Total explained variance of the models (R2lr), and the partial variances explained by each variable (R2par) are also shown.

Sample size refers to the total number of species in the analysed datasets.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close