Table 1.

Mean numbers of phytomers, associated standard deviations, coefficients of variation (i.e. ratio of the standard deviation to the mean) and maximum numbers of phytomers for proleptic and sylleptic shoots on mature trees of four peach cultivars

Shoot typeCultivarMean ± s.d.Coefficient of variationMaximum number of phytomers
Proleptic‘Lorrie May’32.5 ± 5.82abc0.1744
‘Flavorcrest’33.7 ± 7.19ab0.2146
‘Elegant Lady’35.1 ± 5.45a0.1544
‘O’Henry’28.6 ± 6.94de0.2344
Sylleptic‘Lorrie May’27.9 ± 4.73e0.1639
‘Flavorcrest’31.6 ± 5.74bcd0.1844
‘Elegant Lady’29.8 ± 4.68cde0.1541
‘O’Henry’23.0 ± 3.74f0.1633
Shoot type effect***
Cultivar effect***
Shoot type × cultivar effectns
Shoot typeCultivarMean ± s.d.Coefficient of variationMaximum number of phytomers
Proleptic‘Lorrie May’32.5 ± 5.82abc0.1744
‘Flavorcrest’33.7 ± 7.19ab0.2146
‘Elegant Lady’35.1 ± 5.45a0.1544
‘O’Henry’28.6 ± 6.94de0.2344
Sylleptic‘Lorrie May’27.9 ± 4.73e0.1639
‘Flavorcrest’31.6 ± 5.74bcd0.1844
‘Elegant Lady’29.8 ± 4.68cde0.1541
‘O’Henry’23.0 ± 3.74f0.1633
Shoot type effect***
Cultivar effect***
Shoot type × cultivar effectns

Shoot type and cultivar effects were assessed by a two-way ANOVA with interaction. This analysis was followed by a post hoc Tukey’s honest significant difference test considering the complete dataset.

Values with different superscript letters are significantly different (P < 0.05).

***P < 0.001; ns, not significant.

Table 1.

Mean numbers of phytomers, associated standard deviations, coefficients of variation (i.e. ratio of the standard deviation to the mean) and maximum numbers of phytomers for proleptic and sylleptic shoots on mature trees of four peach cultivars

Shoot typeCultivarMean ± s.d.Coefficient of variationMaximum number of phytomers
Proleptic‘Lorrie May’32.5 ± 5.82abc0.1744
‘Flavorcrest’33.7 ± 7.19ab0.2146
‘Elegant Lady’35.1 ± 5.45a0.1544
‘O’Henry’28.6 ± 6.94de0.2344
Sylleptic‘Lorrie May’27.9 ± 4.73e0.1639
‘Flavorcrest’31.6 ± 5.74bcd0.1844
‘Elegant Lady’29.8 ± 4.68cde0.1541
‘O’Henry’23.0 ± 3.74f0.1633
Shoot type effect***
Cultivar effect***
Shoot type × cultivar effectns
Shoot typeCultivarMean ± s.d.Coefficient of variationMaximum number of phytomers
Proleptic‘Lorrie May’32.5 ± 5.82abc0.1744
‘Flavorcrest’33.7 ± 7.19ab0.2146
‘Elegant Lady’35.1 ± 5.45a0.1544
‘O’Henry’28.6 ± 6.94de0.2344
Sylleptic‘Lorrie May’27.9 ± 4.73e0.1639
‘Flavorcrest’31.6 ± 5.74bcd0.1844
‘Elegant Lady’29.8 ± 4.68cde0.1541
‘O’Henry’23.0 ± 3.74f0.1633
Shoot type effect***
Cultivar effect***
Shoot type × cultivar effectns

Shoot type and cultivar effects were assessed by a two-way ANOVA with interaction. This analysis was followed by a post hoc Tukey’s honest significant difference test considering the complete dataset.

Values with different superscript letters are significantly different (P < 0.05).

***P < 0.001; ns, not significant.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close