Mean numbers of phytomers, associated standard deviations, coefficients of variation (i.e. ratio of the standard deviation to the mean) and maximum numbers of phytomers for proleptic and sylleptic shoots on mature trees of four peach cultivars
Shoot type . | Cultivar . | Mean ± s.d. . | Coefficient of variation . | Maximum number of phytomers . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Proleptic | ‘Lorrie May’ | 32.5 ± 5.82abc | 0.17 | 44 |
‘Flavorcrest’ | 33.7 ± 7.19ab | 0.21 | 46 | |
‘Elegant Lady’ | 35.1 ± 5.45a | 0.15 | 44 | |
‘O’Henry’ | 28.6 ± 6.94de | 0.23 | 44 | |
Sylleptic | ‘Lorrie May’ | 27.9 ± 4.73e | 0.16 | 39 |
‘Flavorcrest’ | 31.6 ± 5.74bcd | 0.18 | 44 | |
‘Elegant Lady’ | 29.8 ± 4.68cde | 0.15 | 41 | |
‘O’Henry’ | 23.0 ± 3.74f | 0.16 | 33 | |
Shoot type effect | *** | |||
Cultivar effect | *** | |||
Shoot type × cultivar effect | ns |
Shoot type . | Cultivar . | Mean ± s.d. . | Coefficient of variation . | Maximum number of phytomers . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Proleptic | ‘Lorrie May’ | 32.5 ± 5.82abc | 0.17 | 44 |
‘Flavorcrest’ | 33.7 ± 7.19ab | 0.21 | 46 | |
‘Elegant Lady’ | 35.1 ± 5.45a | 0.15 | 44 | |
‘O’Henry’ | 28.6 ± 6.94de | 0.23 | 44 | |
Sylleptic | ‘Lorrie May’ | 27.9 ± 4.73e | 0.16 | 39 |
‘Flavorcrest’ | 31.6 ± 5.74bcd | 0.18 | 44 | |
‘Elegant Lady’ | 29.8 ± 4.68cde | 0.15 | 41 | |
‘O’Henry’ | 23.0 ± 3.74f | 0.16 | 33 | |
Shoot type effect | *** | |||
Cultivar effect | *** | |||
Shoot type × cultivar effect | ns |
Shoot type and cultivar effects were assessed by a two-way ANOVA with interaction. This analysis was followed by a post hoc Tukey’s honest significant difference test considering the complete dataset.
Values with different superscript letters are significantly different (P < 0.05).
***P < 0.001; ns, not significant.
Mean numbers of phytomers, associated standard deviations, coefficients of variation (i.e. ratio of the standard deviation to the mean) and maximum numbers of phytomers for proleptic and sylleptic shoots on mature trees of four peach cultivars
Shoot type . | Cultivar . | Mean ± s.d. . | Coefficient of variation . | Maximum number of phytomers . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Proleptic | ‘Lorrie May’ | 32.5 ± 5.82abc | 0.17 | 44 |
‘Flavorcrest’ | 33.7 ± 7.19ab | 0.21 | 46 | |
‘Elegant Lady’ | 35.1 ± 5.45a | 0.15 | 44 | |
‘O’Henry’ | 28.6 ± 6.94de | 0.23 | 44 | |
Sylleptic | ‘Lorrie May’ | 27.9 ± 4.73e | 0.16 | 39 |
‘Flavorcrest’ | 31.6 ± 5.74bcd | 0.18 | 44 | |
‘Elegant Lady’ | 29.8 ± 4.68cde | 0.15 | 41 | |
‘O’Henry’ | 23.0 ± 3.74f | 0.16 | 33 | |
Shoot type effect | *** | |||
Cultivar effect | *** | |||
Shoot type × cultivar effect | ns |
Shoot type . | Cultivar . | Mean ± s.d. . | Coefficient of variation . | Maximum number of phytomers . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Proleptic | ‘Lorrie May’ | 32.5 ± 5.82abc | 0.17 | 44 |
‘Flavorcrest’ | 33.7 ± 7.19ab | 0.21 | 46 | |
‘Elegant Lady’ | 35.1 ± 5.45a | 0.15 | 44 | |
‘O’Henry’ | 28.6 ± 6.94de | 0.23 | 44 | |
Sylleptic | ‘Lorrie May’ | 27.9 ± 4.73e | 0.16 | 39 |
‘Flavorcrest’ | 31.6 ± 5.74bcd | 0.18 | 44 | |
‘Elegant Lady’ | 29.8 ± 4.68cde | 0.15 | 41 | |
‘O’Henry’ | 23.0 ± 3.74f | 0.16 | 33 | |
Shoot type effect | *** | |||
Cultivar effect | *** | |||
Shoot type × cultivar effect | ns |
Shoot type and cultivar effects were assessed by a two-way ANOVA with interaction. This analysis was followed by a post hoc Tukey’s honest significant difference test considering the complete dataset.
Values with different superscript letters are significantly different (P < 0.05).
***P < 0.001; ns, not significant.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.