Table 3:

Results of the stepwise logistic regression analysis

PredictorsOdds ratioSEP-value95% CIScore
Male gender2.30.470.0770.9–5.71
Presence of hilar or interlobar lymph nodes visible at CT scan2.90.510.0401.0–7.81
Presence of thick pleura2.40.480.0750.9–6.01
Presence of bullous/centrilobular emphysema2.70.480.0381.1–6.91
PredictorsOdds ratioSEP-value95% CIScore
Male gender2.30.470.0770.9–5.71
Presence of hilar or interlobar lymph nodes visible at CT scan2.90.510.0401.0–7.81
Presence of thick pleura2.40.480.0750.9–6.01
Presence of bullous/centrilobular emphysema2.70.480.0381.1–6.91

Only the final model is displayed (P for retention <0.1). Goodness of fit Hosmer–Lemeshow P-value = 0.81 (derivation set); c-index 0.76 (derivation set), 0.72 (validation set).

CI: confidence interval; CT: computed tomography; SE: standard error.

Table 3:

Results of the stepwise logistic regression analysis

PredictorsOdds ratioSEP-value95% CIScore
Male gender2.30.470.0770.9–5.71
Presence of hilar or interlobar lymph nodes visible at CT scan2.90.510.0401.0–7.81
Presence of thick pleura2.40.480.0750.9–6.01
Presence of bullous/centrilobular emphysema2.70.480.0381.1–6.91
PredictorsOdds ratioSEP-value95% CIScore
Male gender2.30.470.0770.9–5.71
Presence of hilar or interlobar lymph nodes visible at CT scan2.90.510.0401.0–7.81
Presence of thick pleura2.40.480.0750.9–6.01
Presence of bullous/centrilobular emphysema2.70.480.0381.1–6.91

Only the final model is displayed (P for retention <0.1). Goodness of fit Hosmer–Lemeshow P-value = 0.81 (derivation set); c-index 0.76 (derivation set), 0.72 (validation set).

CI: confidence interval; CT: computed tomography; SE: standard error.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close