Table 2

Procedural data

CharacteristicsAll patients (n = 27)No post-operative pain (n = 18)Post-operative pain (n = 9)P-value
Implant to lead extraction (years)4.08 ± 4.24.5 ± 5.25.3 ± 5.30.661
Malformed pocket2 (7.4%)2 (100%)0 (0%)0.298
Positive culture (Propionibacterium)2 (7.4%)2 (100%)0 (0%)0.298
Procedure type
 Extraction without reimplantation8 (29.6%)7 (87.5%)1 (12.5%)0.136
 Extraction with reimplantation19 (70.3%)11 (57.8%)8 (42.1%)
 Ipsilateral placement8 (42.1%)3 (37.5%)5 (62.5%)0.124
 Contralateral placement11 (57.8%)8 (72.7%)3 (27.2%)
CharacteristicsAll patients (n = 27)No post-operative pain (n = 18)Post-operative pain (n = 9)P-value
Implant to lead extraction (years)4.08 ± 4.24.5 ± 5.25.3 ± 5.30.661
Malformed pocket2 (7.4%)2 (100%)0 (0%)0.298
Positive culture (Propionibacterium)2 (7.4%)2 (100%)0 (0%)0.298
Procedure type
 Extraction without reimplantation8 (29.6%)7 (87.5%)1 (12.5%)0.136
 Extraction with reimplantation19 (70.3%)11 (57.8%)8 (42.1%)
 Ipsilateral placement8 (42.1%)3 (37.5%)5 (62.5%)0.124
 Contralateral placement11 (57.8%)8 (72.7%)3 (27.2%)
Table 2

Procedural data

CharacteristicsAll patients (n = 27)No post-operative pain (n = 18)Post-operative pain (n = 9)P-value
Implant to lead extraction (years)4.08 ± 4.24.5 ± 5.25.3 ± 5.30.661
Malformed pocket2 (7.4%)2 (100%)0 (0%)0.298
Positive culture (Propionibacterium)2 (7.4%)2 (100%)0 (0%)0.298
Procedure type
 Extraction without reimplantation8 (29.6%)7 (87.5%)1 (12.5%)0.136
 Extraction with reimplantation19 (70.3%)11 (57.8%)8 (42.1%)
 Ipsilateral placement8 (42.1%)3 (37.5%)5 (62.5%)0.124
 Contralateral placement11 (57.8%)8 (72.7%)3 (27.2%)
CharacteristicsAll patients (n = 27)No post-operative pain (n = 18)Post-operative pain (n = 9)P-value
Implant to lead extraction (years)4.08 ± 4.24.5 ± 5.25.3 ± 5.30.661
Malformed pocket2 (7.4%)2 (100%)0 (0%)0.298
Positive culture (Propionibacterium)2 (7.4%)2 (100%)0 (0%)0.298
Procedure type
 Extraction without reimplantation8 (29.6%)7 (87.5%)1 (12.5%)0.136
 Extraction with reimplantation19 (70.3%)11 (57.8%)8 (42.1%)
 Ipsilateral placement8 (42.1%)3 (37.5%)5 (62.5%)0.124
 Contralateral placement11 (57.8%)8 (72.7%)3 (27.2%)
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close