Insecticidal seed treatment | In-furrow insecticide treatment | Mean node injury scale (0–3)a | ||
Product (AI) | Rate (mg AI/seed) | Product (AI) | Rate (per acre) | |
Untreated check | – | Untreated check | – | 0.49a |
Poncho (Clothianidin) | 0.5 | – | – | 0.18b |
Poncho (Clothianidin) | 0.5 | Capture LFR (Bifenthrin) | 16 fl oz | 0.18b |
Poncho (Clothianidin) | 0.5 | Force 3G (Tefluthrin) | 5 lb | 0.12b |
Poncho (Clothianidin) | 0.5 | Aztec 4.67G (Tebupirimphos + Cyfluthrin) | 3 lb | 0.04b |
Poncho (Clothianidin) | 0.5 | Ampex Insecticide (Clothianidin) | 5.12 oz wt (0.16 lb AI) | 0.11b |
Poncho (Clothianidin) | 0.5 | Asana XL (Esfenvalerate) | 19 fl oz | 0.11b |
Poncho (Clothianidin) | 0.5 | Asana XL (Esfenvalerate) | 15 fl oz | 0.08b |
Poncho (Clothianidin) | 0.5 | Asana XL (Esfenvalerate) | 9.6 fl oz | 0.10b |
Lumivia (Chlorantraniliprole) + Cruiser (Thiamethoxam) | 0.25 + 0.25 | – | – | 0.23b |
Insecticidal seed treatment | In-furrow insecticide treatment | Mean node injury scale (0–3)a | ||
Product (AI) | Rate (mg AI/seed) | Product (AI) | Rate (per acre) | |
Untreated check | – | Untreated check | – | 0.49a |
Poncho (Clothianidin) | 0.5 | – | – | 0.18b |
Poncho (Clothianidin) | 0.5 | Capture LFR (Bifenthrin) | 16 fl oz | 0.18b |
Poncho (Clothianidin) | 0.5 | Force 3G (Tefluthrin) | 5 lb | 0.12b |
Poncho (Clothianidin) | 0.5 | Aztec 4.67G (Tebupirimphos + Cyfluthrin) | 3 lb | 0.04b |
Poncho (Clothianidin) | 0.5 | Ampex Insecticide (Clothianidin) | 5.12 oz wt (0.16 lb AI) | 0.11b |
Poncho (Clothianidin) | 0.5 | Asana XL (Esfenvalerate) | 19 fl oz | 0.11b |
Poncho (Clothianidin) | 0.5 | Asana XL (Esfenvalerate) | 15 fl oz | 0.08b |
Poncho (Clothianidin) | 0.5 | Asana XL (Esfenvalerate) | 9.6 fl oz | 0.10b |
Lumivia (Chlorantraniliprole) + Cruiser (Thiamethoxam) | 0.25 + 0.25 | – | – | 0.23b |
Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P = 0.05).
aThe node injury scale indicates the number of nodes of feeding injury to roots caused by WCRW, with one node of feeding indicated by a score of 1.0.
Insecticidal seed treatment | In-furrow insecticide treatment | Mean node injury scale (0–3)a | ||
Product (AI) | Rate (mg AI/seed) | Product (AI) | Rate (per acre) | |
Untreated check | – | Untreated check | – | 0.49a |
Poncho (Clothianidin) | 0.5 | – | – | 0.18b |
Poncho (Clothianidin) | 0.5 | Capture LFR (Bifenthrin) | 16 fl oz | 0.18b |
Poncho (Clothianidin) | 0.5 | Force 3G (Tefluthrin) | 5 lb | 0.12b |
Poncho (Clothianidin) | 0.5 | Aztec 4.67G (Tebupirimphos + Cyfluthrin) | 3 lb | 0.04b |
Poncho (Clothianidin) | 0.5 | Ampex Insecticide (Clothianidin) | 5.12 oz wt (0.16 lb AI) | 0.11b |
Poncho (Clothianidin) | 0.5 | Asana XL (Esfenvalerate) | 19 fl oz | 0.11b |
Poncho (Clothianidin) | 0.5 | Asana XL (Esfenvalerate) | 15 fl oz | 0.08b |
Poncho (Clothianidin) | 0.5 | Asana XL (Esfenvalerate) | 9.6 fl oz | 0.10b |
Lumivia (Chlorantraniliprole) + Cruiser (Thiamethoxam) | 0.25 + 0.25 | – | – | 0.23b |
Insecticidal seed treatment | In-furrow insecticide treatment | Mean node injury scale (0–3)a | ||
Product (AI) | Rate (mg AI/seed) | Product (AI) | Rate (per acre) | |
Untreated check | – | Untreated check | – | 0.49a |
Poncho (Clothianidin) | 0.5 | – | – | 0.18b |
Poncho (Clothianidin) | 0.5 | Capture LFR (Bifenthrin) | 16 fl oz | 0.18b |
Poncho (Clothianidin) | 0.5 | Force 3G (Tefluthrin) | 5 lb | 0.12b |
Poncho (Clothianidin) | 0.5 | Aztec 4.67G (Tebupirimphos + Cyfluthrin) | 3 lb | 0.04b |
Poncho (Clothianidin) | 0.5 | Ampex Insecticide (Clothianidin) | 5.12 oz wt (0.16 lb AI) | 0.11b |
Poncho (Clothianidin) | 0.5 | Asana XL (Esfenvalerate) | 19 fl oz | 0.11b |
Poncho (Clothianidin) | 0.5 | Asana XL (Esfenvalerate) | 15 fl oz | 0.08b |
Poncho (Clothianidin) | 0.5 | Asana XL (Esfenvalerate) | 9.6 fl oz | 0.10b |
Lumivia (Chlorantraniliprole) + Cruiser (Thiamethoxam) | 0.25 + 0.25 | – | – | 0.23b |
Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P = 0.05).
aThe node injury scale indicates the number of nodes of feeding injury to roots caused by WCRW, with one node of feeding indicated by a score of 1.0.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.