Table 4.

Transition Probabilities of Obesity Subphenotype Status From Baseline (Start of the Observation Period) to Follow-Up Adjusted for Baseline Age, Baseline Examination, and Sex

Obesity Subphenotype at BaselineObesity Subphenotype at Follow-Up Examinationa
MHNOMUNOMHOMUO
MHNO
 Men (n = 3268)0.66 (0.64–0.68)0.27 (0.25–0.29)0.03 (0.03–0.04)0.03 (0.03–0.04)
 Women (n = 5319)0.77 (0.75–0.78)0.17 (0.16–0.19)0.03 (0.02–0.04)0.03 (0.02–0.03)
MUNO
 Men (n = 2906)0.15 (0.13–0.16)0.74 (0.72–0.76)0.01 (0.01–0.01)0.10 (0.09–0.12)
 Women (n = 1906)0.23 (0.21–0.25)0.64 (0.62–0.67)0.01 (0.01–0.02)0.11 (0.09–0.13)
MHO
 Men (n = 528)0.07 (0.05–0.09)0.03 (0.02–0.04)0.44 (0.39–0.49)0.46 (0.42–0.51)
 Women (n = 576)0.09 (0.07–0.11)0.02 (0.01–0.03)0.45 (0.41–0.50)0.43 (0.39–0.48)
MUO
 Men (n = 1368)0.02 (0.02–0.03)0.09 (0.08–0.11)0.08 (0.07–0.10)0.80 (0.78–0.83)
 Women (n = 1075)0.03 (0.02–0.04)0.07 (0.06–0.09)0.09 (0.07–0.11)0.81 (0.78–0.83)
Obesity Subphenotype at BaselineObesity Subphenotype at Follow-Up Examinationa
MHNOMUNOMHOMUO
MHNO
 Men (n = 3268)0.66 (0.64–0.68)0.27 (0.25–0.29)0.03 (0.03–0.04)0.03 (0.03–0.04)
 Women (n = 5319)0.77 (0.75–0.78)0.17 (0.16–0.19)0.03 (0.02–0.04)0.03 (0.02–0.03)
MUNO
 Men (n = 2906)0.15 (0.13–0.16)0.74 (0.72–0.76)0.01 (0.01–0.01)0.10 (0.09–0.12)
 Women (n = 1906)0.23 (0.21–0.25)0.64 (0.62–0.67)0.01 (0.01–0.02)0.11 (0.09–0.13)
MHO
 Men (n = 528)0.07 (0.05–0.09)0.03 (0.02–0.04)0.44 (0.39–0.49)0.46 (0.42–0.51)
 Women (n = 576)0.09 (0.07–0.11)0.02 (0.01–0.03)0.45 (0.41–0.50)0.43 (0.39–0.48)
MUO
 Men (n = 1368)0.02 (0.02–0.03)0.09 (0.08–0.11)0.08 (0.07–0.10)0.80 (0.78–0.83)
 Women (n = 1075)0.03 (0.02–0.04)0.07 (0.06–0.09)0.09 (0.07–0.11)0.81 (0.78–0.83)

Data are expected proportion (95% CI).

a

The data used to model these transition probabilities are the pooled transition data capturing the potential change of obesity subphenotype status from each examination to the subsequent examination from 1979–1983 to 1998–2001 (total of six examinations).

Table 4.

Transition Probabilities of Obesity Subphenotype Status From Baseline (Start of the Observation Period) to Follow-Up Adjusted for Baseline Age, Baseline Examination, and Sex

Obesity Subphenotype at BaselineObesity Subphenotype at Follow-Up Examinationa
MHNOMUNOMHOMUO
MHNO
 Men (n = 3268)0.66 (0.64–0.68)0.27 (0.25–0.29)0.03 (0.03–0.04)0.03 (0.03–0.04)
 Women (n = 5319)0.77 (0.75–0.78)0.17 (0.16–0.19)0.03 (0.02–0.04)0.03 (0.02–0.03)
MUNO
 Men (n = 2906)0.15 (0.13–0.16)0.74 (0.72–0.76)0.01 (0.01–0.01)0.10 (0.09–0.12)
 Women (n = 1906)0.23 (0.21–0.25)0.64 (0.62–0.67)0.01 (0.01–0.02)0.11 (0.09–0.13)
MHO
 Men (n = 528)0.07 (0.05–0.09)0.03 (0.02–0.04)0.44 (0.39–0.49)0.46 (0.42–0.51)
 Women (n = 576)0.09 (0.07–0.11)0.02 (0.01–0.03)0.45 (0.41–0.50)0.43 (0.39–0.48)
MUO
 Men (n = 1368)0.02 (0.02–0.03)0.09 (0.08–0.11)0.08 (0.07–0.10)0.80 (0.78–0.83)
 Women (n = 1075)0.03 (0.02–0.04)0.07 (0.06–0.09)0.09 (0.07–0.11)0.81 (0.78–0.83)
Obesity Subphenotype at BaselineObesity Subphenotype at Follow-Up Examinationa
MHNOMUNOMHOMUO
MHNO
 Men (n = 3268)0.66 (0.64–0.68)0.27 (0.25–0.29)0.03 (0.03–0.04)0.03 (0.03–0.04)
 Women (n = 5319)0.77 (0.75–0.78)0.17 (0.16–0.19)0.03 (0.02–0.04)0.03 (0.02–0.03)
MUNO
 Men (n = 2906)0.15 (0.13–0.16)0.74 (0.72–0.76)0.01 (0.01–0.01)0.10 (0.09–0.12)
 Women (n = 1906)0.23 (0.21–0.25)0.64 (0.62–0.67)0.01 (0.01–0.02)0.11 (0.09–0.13)
MHO
 Men (n = 528)0.07 (0.05–0.09)0.03 (0.02–0.04)0.44 (0.39–0.49)0.46 (0.42–0.51)
 Women (n = 576)0.09 (0.07–0.11)0.02 (0.01–0.03)0.45 (0.41–0.50)0.43 (0.39–0.48)
MUO
 Men (n = 1368)0.02 (0.02–0.03)0.09 (0.08–0.11)0.08 (0.07–0.10)0.80 (0.78–0.83)
 Women (n = 1075)0.03 (0.02–0.04)0.07 (0.06–0.09)0.09 (0.07–0.11)0.81 (0.78–0.83)

Data are expected proportion (95% CI).

a

The data used to model these transition probabilities are the pooled transition data capturing the potential change of obesity subphenotype status from each examination to the subsequent examination from 1979–1983 to 1998–2001 (total of six examinations).

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close