Table A1.

Test performed for several normal galaxies in the fields of three AGNs of our WFPC2 sub-sample to investigate the impact of the PSF undersampling. The table shows the results of fitting with galfit the host galaxies using (a) the HLA image, (b) the original raw unrotated image, and (c) this image smoothed to fulfill Nyquist sampling. Column (1): total magnitude Mag of the galfit model. Columns (2) and (3): Mag and light fraction of the point source. Columns (4) to (7): Mag, LF, effective radius re, in kpc and index n of first Sérsic component . Columns (8) to (11): same for second Sérsic component. Column (12): galaxy classification following the criteria in Section 3.2.4. The classification is consistent using (a), (b), and (c) for all objects.

ImageTotalPoint sourceSersic 1Sersic 2Class
MagMagLF (%)MagLF (%)renMagLF (%)ren
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)
Galaxy 1
(a)21.925.14.9921.995.014.81.0Disc-dominated
(b)21.925.15.6422.094.364.60.8Disc-dominated
(c)22.025.53.7422.096.264.40.7Disc-dominated
Galaxy 2
(a)20.920.9100.002.70.9Disc-dominated
(b)20.920.9100.002.91.0Disc-dominated
(c)21.021.0100.002.80.9Disc-dominated
Galaxy 3
(a)19.621.714.0119.885.992.82.9Bulge-dominated
(b)19.521.220.2619.879.742.72.3Bulge-dominated
(c)19.621.516.9219.883.082.42.0Bulge-dominated
Galaxy 4
(a)20.722.225.331.71.421.074.676.20.3Disc-dominated
(b)20.422.220.381.41.020.779.626.30.3Disc-dominated
(c)20.421.924.931.51.720.775.076.40.2Disc-dominated
Galaxy 5
(a)20.922.523.821.276.162.11.9Disc-dominated
(b)20.721.932.421.167.612.41.4Disc-dominated
(c)20.721.933.321.266.672.61.0Disc-dominated
ImageTotalPoint sourceSersic 1Sersic 2Class
MagMagLF (%)MagLF (%)renMagLF (%)ren
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)
Galaxy 1
(a)21.925.14.9921.995.014.81.0Disc-dominated
(b)21.925.15.6422.094.364.60.8Disc-dominated
(c)22.025.53.7422.096.264.40.7Disc-dominated
Galaxy 2
(a)20.920.9100.002.70.9Disc-dominated
(b)20.920.9100.002.91.0Disc-dominated
(c)21.021.0100.002.80.9Disc-dominated
Galaxy 3
(a)19.621.714.0119.885.992.82.9Bulge-dominated
(b)19.521.220.2619.879.742.72.3Bulge-dominated
(c)19.621.516.9219.883.082.42.0Bulge-dominated
Galaxy 4
(a)20.722.225.331.71.421.074.676.20.3Disc-dominated
(b)20.422.220.381.41.020.779.626.30.3Disc-dominated
(c)20.421.924.931.51.720.775.076.40.2Disc-dominated
Galaxy 5
(a)20.922.523.821.276.162.11.9Disc-dominated
(b)20.721.932.421.167.612.41.4Disc-dominated
(c)20.721.933.321.266.672.61.0Disc-dominated
Table A1.

Test performed for several normal galaxies in the fields of three AGNs of our WFPC2 sub-sample to investigate the impact of the PSF undersampling. The table shows the results of fitting with galfit the host galaxies using (a) the HLA image, (b) the original raw unrotated image, and (c) this image smoothed to fulfill Nyquist sampling. Column (1): total magnitude Mag of the galfit model. Columns (2) and (3): Mag and light fraction of the point source. Columns (4) to (7): Mag, LF, effective radius re, in kpc and index n of first Sérsic component . Columns (8) to (11): same for second Sérsic component. Column (12): galaxy classification following the criteria in Section 3.2.4. The classification is consistent using (a), (b), and (c) for all objects.

ImageTotalPoint sourceSersic 1Sersic 2Class
MagMagLF (%)MagLF (%)renMagLF (%)ren
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)
Galaxy 1
(a)21.925.14.9921.995.014.81.0Disc-dominated
(b)21.925.15.6422.094.364.60.8Disc-dominated
(c)22.025.53.7422.096.264.40.7Disc-dominated
Galaxy 2
(a)20.920.9100.002.70.9Disc-dominated
(b)20.920.9100.002.91.0Disc-dominated
(c)21.021.0100.002.80.9Disc-dominated
Galaxy 3
(a)19.621.714.0119.885.992.82.9Bulge-dominated
(b)19.521.220.2619.879.742.72.3Bulge-dominated
(c)19.621.516.9219.883.082.42.0Bulge-dominated
Galaxy 4
(a)20.722.225.331.71.421.074.676.20.3Disc-dominated
(b)20.422.220.381.41.020.779.626.30.3Disc-dominated
(c)20.421.924.931.51.720.775.076.40.2Disc-dominated
Galaxy 5
(a)20.922.523.821.276.162.11.9Disc-dominated
(b)20.721.932.421.167.612.41.4Disc-dominated
(c)20.721.933.321.266.672.61.0Disc-dominated
ImageTotalPoint sourceSersic 1Sersic 2Class
MagMagLF (%)MagLF (%)renMagLF (%)ren
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)
Galaxy 1
(a)21.925.14.9921.995.014.81.0Disc-dominated
(b)21.925.15.6422.094.364.60.8Disc-dominated
(c)22.025.53.7422.096.264.40.7Disc-dominated
Galaxy 2
(a)20.920.9100.002.70.9Disc-dominated
(b)20.920.9100.002.91.0Disc-dominated
(c)21.021.0100.002.80.9Disc-dominated
Galaxy 3
(a)19.621.714.0119.885.992.82.9Bulge-dominated
(b)19.521.220.2619.879.742.72.3Bulge-dominated
(c)19.621.516.9219.883.082.42.0Bulge-dominated
Galaxy 4
(a)20.722.225.331.71.421.074.676.20.3Disc-dominated
(b)20.422.220.381.41.020.779.626.30.3Disc-dominated
(c)20.421.924.931.51.720.775.076.40.2Disc-dominated
Galaxy 5
(a)20.922.523.821.276.162.11.9Disc-dominated
(b)20.721.932.421.167.612.41.4Disc-dominated
(c)20.721.933.321.266.672.61.0Disc-dominated
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close