Characteristics of the DES-Y1 BAO sample, as a function of redshift. Results are shown for a selection of the sample in bins according to DNF photo |$z$| (|$z$|photo) estimate in top of the table and BPZ in the bottom, both with MOF photometry. Here, |$\bar{z}=\lt z_{\mathrm{ true}}\gt$| is the mean true redshift, σ68 and W68 are the 68 per cent confidence widths of (|$z$|photo−|$z$|true)/(1 + |$z$|true) and |$z$|true, respectively, all estimated from COSMOS–DES validation with SVC correction, as detailed in Section 4 and Fig. 7. fstar is the estimated stellar contamination fraction, see Section 6.
DNF | Ngal | bias | |$\bar{z}$| | σ68 | W68 | fstar |
0.6−0.7 | 386 057 | 1.81 ± 0.05 | 0.652 | 0.023 | 0.047 | 0.004 |
0.7−0.8 | 353 789 | 1.77 ± 0.05 | 0.739 | 0.028 | 0.068 | 0.037 |
0.8−0.9 | 330 959 | 1.78 ± 0.05 | 0.844 | 0.029 | 0.060 | 0.012 |
0.9−1.0 | 229 395 | 2.05 ± 0.06 | 0.936 | 0.036 | 0.067 | 0.015 |
BPZ | Ngal | bias | |$\bar{z}$| | σ68 | W68 | fstar |
0.6−0.7 | 332 242 | 1.90 ± 0.05 | 0.656 | 0.027 | 0.049 | 0.018 |
0.7−0.8 | 429 366 | 1.79 ± 0.05 | 0.746 | 0.031 | 0.076 | 0.042 |
0.8−0.9 | 380 059 | 1.81 ± 0.06 | 0.866 | 0.034 | 0.060 | 0.015 |
0.9−1.0 | 180 560 | 2.05 ± 0.07 | 0.948 | 0.039 | 0.068 | 0.006 |
DNF | Ngal | bias | |$\bar{z}$| | σ68 | W68 | fstar |
0.6−0.7 | 386 057 | 1.81 ± 0.05 | 0.652 | 0.023 | 0.047 | 0.004 |
0.7−0.8 | 353 789 | 1.77 ± 0.05 | 0.739 | 0.028 | 0.068 | 0.037 |
0.8−0.9 | 330 959 | 1.78 ± 0.05 | 0.844 | 0.029 | 0.060 | 0.012 |
0.9−1.0 | 229 395 | 2.05 ± 0.06 | 0.936 | 0.036 | 0.067 | 0.015 |
BPZ | Ngal | bias | |$\bar{z}$| | σ68 | W68 | fstar |
0.6−0.7 | 332 242 | 1.90 ± 0.05 | 0.656 | 0.027 | 0.049 | 0.018 |
0.7−0.8 | 429 366 | 1.79 ± 0.05 | 0.746 | 0.031 | 0.076 | 0.042 |
0.8−0.9 | 380 059 | 1.81 ± 0.06 | 0.866 | 0.034 | 0.060 | 0.015 |
0.9−1.0 | 180 560 | 2.05 ± 0.07 | 0.948 | 0.039 | 0.068 | 0.006 |
Characteristics of the DES-Y1 BAO sample, as a function of redshift. Results are shown for a selection of the sample in bins according to DNF photo |$z$| (|$z$|photo) estimate in top of the table and BPZ in the bottom, both with MOF photometry. Here, |$\bar{z}=\lt z_{\mathrm{ true}}\gt$| is the mean true redshift, σ68 and W68 are the 68 per cent confidence widths of (|$z$|photo−|$z$|true)/(1 + |$z$|true) and |$z$|true, respectively, all estimated from COSMOS–DES validation with SVC correction, as detailed in Section 4 and Fig. 7. fstar is the estimated stellar contamination fraction, see Section 6.
DNF | Ngal | bias | |$\bar{z}$| | σ68 | W68 | fstar |
0.6−0.7 | 386 057 | 1.81 ± 0.05 | 0.652 | 0.023 | 0.047 | 0.004 |
0.7−0.8 | 353 789 | 1.77 ± 0.05 | 0.739 | 0.028 | 0.068 | 0.037 |
0.8−0.9 | 330 959 | 1.78 ± 0.05 | 0.844 | 0.029 | 0.060 | 0.012 |
0.9−1.0 | 229 395 | 2.05 ± 0.06 | 0.936 | 0.036 | 0.067 | 0.015 |
BPZ | Ngal | bias | |$\bar{z}$| | σ68 | W68 | fstar |
0.6−0.7 | 332 242 | 1.90 ± 0.05 | 0.656 | 0.027 | 0.049 | 0.018 |
0.7−0.8 | 429 366 | 1.79 ± 0.05 | 0.746 | 0.031 | 0.076 | 0.042 |
0.8−0.9 | 380 059 | 1.81 ± 0.06 | 0.866 | 0.034 | 0.060 | 0.015 |
0.9−1.0 | 180 560 | 2.05 ± 0.07 | 0.948 | 0.039 | 0.068 | 0.006 |
DNF | Ngal | bias | |$\bar{z}$| | σ68 | W68 | fstar |
0.6−0.7 | 386 057 | 1.81 ± 0.05 | 0.652 | 0.023 | 0.047 | 0.004 |
0.7−0.8 | 353 789 | 1.77 ± 0.05 | 0.739 | 0.028 | 0.068 | 0.037 |
0.8−0.9 | 330 959 | 1.78 ± 0.05 | 0.844 | 0.029 | 0.060 | 0.012 |
0.9−1.0 | 229 395 | 2.05 ± 0.06 | 0.936 | 0.036 | 0.067 | 0.015 |
BPZ | Ngal | bias | |$\bar{z}$| | σ68 | W68 | fstar |
0.6−0.7 | 332 242 | 1.90 ± 0.05 | 0.656 | 0.027 | 0.049 | 0.018 |
0.7−0.8 | 429 366 | 1.79 ± 0.05 | 0.746 | 0.031 | 0.076 | 0.042 |
0.8−0.9 | 380 059 | 1.81 ± 0.06 | 0.866 | 0.034 | 0.060 | 0.015 |
0.9−1.0 | 180 560 | 2.05 ± 0.07 | 0.948 | 0.039 | 0.068 | 0.006 |
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.