| Treatment/formulation . | Rate—amt product/acre . | Nymphs . | Adults . | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 Aug (6 DAT) . | 10 Aug (13 DAT) . | 3 Aug (6 DAT) . | 10 Aug (13 DAT) . | ||
| 1. Untreated check | – | 266.3a | 90.8a | 5.5 | 3.0 |
| 2. Certador EC + Scanner | 6.5 fl. oz + 0.25% v/v | 0.3b | 7.5b | 0.0 | 0.3 |
| 3. Certador EC + Scanner | 19.5 fl. oz + 0.25% v/v | 1.3b | 0.3b | 0.0 | 0.5 |
| 4. Certador EC + Scanner | 26 fl. oz + 0.25 % v/v | 3.3b | 2.0b | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| 5. Actara 25WG + Scanner | 5.5 oz + 0.25% v/v | 0.8b | 1.5b | 1.3 | 1.0 |
| 6. Brigade 2EC + Scanner | 5.20 fl. oz + 0.25% v/v | 1.8b | 9.3b | 0.3 | 3.0 |
| 7. Harvanta 50SL + Scanner | 11 fl. oz + 0.25% v/v | 6.8b | 12.3b | 4.0 | 2.3 |
| 8. Harvanta 50SL + Scanner | 16.4 fl. oz + 0.25% v/v | 8.3b | 1.8b | 3.8 | 2.3 |
| 9. Sivanto 200SL+ Scanner | 10 fl. oz + 0.25% v/v | 3.8b | 18.0b | 0.8 | 1.5 |
| P value from ANOVA | 0.0002 | 0.0013 | ns | ns | |
| Treatment/formulation . | Rate—amt product/acre . | Nymphs . | Adults . | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 Aug (6 DAT) . | 10 Aug (13 DAT) . | 3 Aug (6 DAT) . | 10 Aug (13 DAT) . | ||
| 1. Untreated check | – | 266.3a | 90.8a | 5.5 | 3.0 |
| 2. Certador EC + Scanner | 6.5 fl. oz + 0.25% v/v | 0.3b | 7.5b | 0.0 | 0.3 |
| 3. Certador EC + Scanner | 19.5 fl. oz + 0.25% v/v | 1.3b | 0.3b | 0.0 | 0.5 |
| 4. Certador EC + Scanner | 26 fl. oz + 0.25 % v/v | 3.3b | 2.0b | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| 5. Actara 25WG + Scanner | 5.5 oz + 0.25% v/v | 0.8b | 1.5b | 1.3 | 1.0 |
| 6. Brigade 2EC + Scanner | 5.20 fl. oz + 0.25% v/v | 1.8b | 9.3b | 0.3 | 3.0 |
| 7. Harvanta 50SL + Scanner | 11 fl. oz + 0.25% v/v | 6.8b | 12.3b | 4.0 | 2.3 |
| 8. Harvanta 50SL + Scanner | 16.4 fl. oz + 0.25% v/v | 8.3b | 1.8b | 3.8 | 2.3 |
| 9. Sivanto 200SL+ Scanner | 10 fl. oz + 0.25% v/v | 3.8b | 18.0b | 0.8 | 1.5 |
| P value from ANOVA | 0.0002 | 0.0013 | ns | ns | |
All data were analyzed using ANOVA. Means were separated using Tukey’s HSD at the 0.05 level of significance. Means followed by the same letter within a column are not significantly different (P > 0.05).
| Treatment/formulation . | Rate—amt product/acre . | Nymphs . | Adults . | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 Aug (6 DAT) . | 10 Aug (13 DAT) . | 3 Aug (6 DAT) . | 10 Aug (13 DAT) . | ||
| 1. Untreated check | – | 266.3a | 90.8a | 5.5 | 3.0 |
| 2. Certador EC + Scanner | 6.5 fl. oz + 0.25% v/v | 0.3b | 7.5b | 0.0 | 0.3 |
| 3. Certador EC + Scanner | 19.5 fl. oz + 0.25% v/v | 1.3b | 0.3b | 0.0 | 0.5 |
| 4. Certador EC + Scanner | 26 fl. oz + 0.25 % v/v | 3.3b | 2.0b | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| 5. Actara 25WG + Scanner | 5.5 oz + 0.25% v/v | 0.8b | 1.5b | 1.3 | 1.0 |
| 6. Brigade 2EC + Scanner | 5.20 fl. oz + 0.25% v/v | 1.8b | 9.3b | 0.3 | 3.0 |
| 7. Harvanta 50SL + Scanner | 11 fl. oz + 0.25% v/v | 6.8b | 12.3b | 4.0 | 2.3 |
| 8. Harvanta 50SL + Scanner | 16.4 fl. oz + 0.25% v/v | 8.3b | 1.8b | 3.8 | 2.3 |
| 9. Sivanto 200SL+ Scanner | 10 fl. oz + 0.25% v/v | 3.8b | 18.0b | 0.8 | 1.5 |
| P value from ANOVA | 0.0002 | 0.0013 | ns | ns | |
| Treatment/formulation . | Rate—amt product/acre . | Nymphs . | Adults . | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 Aug (6 DAT) . | 10 Aug (13 DAT) . | 3 Aug (6 DAT) . | 10 Aug (13 DAT) . | ||
| 1. Untreated check | – | 266.3a | 90.8a | 5.5 | 3.0 |
| 2. Certador EC + Scanner | 6.5 fl. oz + 0.25% v/v | 0.3b | 7.5b | 0.0 | 0.3 |
| 3. Certador EC + Scanner | 19.5 fl. oz + 0.25% v/v | 1.3b | 0.3b | 0.0 | 0.5 |
| 4. Certador EC + Scanner | 26 fl. oz + 0.25 % v/v | 3.3b | 2.0b | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| 5. Actara 25WG + Scanner | 5.5 oz + 0.25% v/v | 0.8b | 1.5b | 1.3 | 1.0 |
| 6. Brigade 2EC + Scanner | 5.20 fl. oz + 0.25% v/v | 1.8b | 9.3b | 0.3 | 3.0 |
| 7. Harvanta 50SL + Scanner | 11 fl. oz + 0.25% v/v | 6.8b | 12.3b | 4.0 | 2.3 |
| 8. Harvanta 50SL + Scanner | 16.4 fl. oz + 0.25% v/v | 8.3b | 1.8b | 3.8 | 2.3 |
| 9. Sivanto 200SL+ Scanner | 10 fl. oz + 0.25% v/v | 3.8b | 18.0b | 0.8 | 1.5 |
| P value from ANOVA | 0.0002 | 0.0013 | ns | ns | |
All data were analyzed using ANOVA. Means were separated using Tukey’s HSD at the 0.05 level of significance. Means followed by the same letter within a column are not significantly different (P > 0.05).
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.
