Table 3.
Open in new tab

Comparison of log halo mass estimates.

NameThis workR17O15P16
NGC 682210.47 ± 0.1010.30|$^{+0.04}_{-0.07}$|––
WLM9.95 ± 0.149.92|$^{+0.09}_{-0.12}$|10.09–
Pegasus8.50 ± 0.558.83|$^{+0.23}_{-0.21}$|9.02–
Aquarius8.82 ± 0.808.83|$^{+0.46}_{-0.38}$|8.80–
NGC 24711.39 ± 0.12––11.10
NameThis workR17O15P16
NGC 682210.47 ± 0.1010.30|$^{+0.04}_{-0.07}$|––
WLM9.95 ± 0.149.92|$^{+0.09}_{-0.12}$|10.09–
Pegasus8.50 ± 0.558.83|$^{+0.23}_{-0.21}$|9.02–
Aquarius8.82 ± 0.808.83|$^{+0.46}_{-0.38}$|8.80–
NGC 24711.39 ± 0.12––11.10

Note. The table lists the halo mass from this work compared to literature works that fit the H i data to a dark matter profile. R17 – Read et al. (2017); O15 – Oh et al. (2015); and P16 – Pace (2016).

Table 3.
Open in new tab

Comparison of log halo mass estimates.

NameThis workR17O15P16
NGC 682210.47 ± 0.1010.30|$^{+0.04}_{-0.07}$|––
WLM9.95 ± 0.149.92|$^{+0.09}_{-0.12}$|10.09–
Pegasus8.50 ± 0.558.83|$^{+0.23}_{-0.21}$|9.02–
Aquarius8.82 ± 0.808.83|$^{+0.46}_{-0.38}$|8.80–
NGC 24711.39 ± 0.12––11.10
NameThis workR17O15P16
NGC 682210.47 ± 0.1010.30|$^{+0.04}_{-0.07}$|––
WLM9.95 ± 0.149.92|$^{+0.09}_{-0.12}$|10.09–
Pegasus8.50 ± 0.558.83|$^{+0.23}_{-0.21}$|9.02–
Aquarius8.82 ± 0.808.83|$^{+0.46}_{-0.38}$|8.80–
NGC 24711.39 ± 0.12––11.10

Note. The table lists the halo mass from this work compared to literature works that fit the H i data to a dark matter profile. R17 – Read et al. (2017); O15 – Oh et al. (2015); and P16 – Pace (2016).

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close