Among patients with LMCAD, in-hospital complications (such as cardiogenic shock, permanent pacemaker implantation, sepsis, myocardial infarction and cerebrovascular events) were not significantly different between those who underwent PCI versus CABG. Similarly, 30-day mortality was not significantly different between the 2 groups (PCI vs CABG 3% vs 2.9%, P = 1.000). However, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis (Fig. 3A) showed that at 3 years of follow-up, the rate of all-cause mortality among patients with LMCAD was significantly higher in those who underwent PCI (26.9%) vs CABG (8.7%; log-rank P-value <0.001 for the overall difference during follow-up). Consistent with the univariable Kaplan–Meier findings, multivariable analysis (Table 3) showed that PCI versus CABG referral was the most powerful predictor of long-term mortality among patients with LMCAD and was associated with a >2-fold mortality hazard increase. Additional predictors of mortality among patients with LMCAD included older age and diabetes mellitus (Table 3). Similar results were obtained after further adjustment for centre volume (Supplementary Material, Table S3).
Hazard ratio for mortality in the entire series of patients with LMCAD at 3 years
. | HR . | 95% CI . | P-value . |
---|---|---|---|
PCI vs CABG | 2.13 | 1.05–4.31 | 0.036 |
Age | 1.07 | 1.03–1.11 | 0.001 |
Male gender | 0.73 | 0.36–1.50 | 0.390 |
SYNTAX score >32 | 0.66 | 0.30–1.48 | 0.314 |
Diabetes mellitus | 2.12 | 1.05–4.27 | 0.036 |
Atrial fibrillation | 2.10 | 0.91–4.86 | 0.084 |
. | HR . | 95% CI . | P-value . |
---|---|---|---|
PCI vs CABG | 2.13 | 1.05–4.31 | 0.036 |
Age | 1.07 | 1.03–1.11 | 0.001 |
Male gender | 0.73 | 0.36–1.50 | 0.390 |
SYNTAX score >32 | 0.66 | 0.30–1.48 | 0.314 |
Diabetes mellitus | 2.12 | 1.05–4.27 | 0.036 |
Atrial fibrillation | 2.10 | 0.91–4.86 | 0.084 |
CABG: coronary artery bypass grafting; CI: confidence interval; HR: hazard ratio; LMCAD: left main coronary artery disease; PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention.
Hazard ratio for mortality in the entire series of patients with LMCAD at 3 years
. | HR . | 95% CI . | P-value . |
---|---|---|---|
PCI vs CABG | 2.13 | 1.05–4.31 | 0.036 |
Age | 1.07 | 1.03–1.11 | 0.001 |
Male gender | 0.73 | 0.36–1.50 | 0.390 |
SYNTAX score >32 | 0.66 | 0.30–1.48 | 0.314 |
Diabetes mellitus | 2.12 | 1.05–4.27 | 0.036 |
Atrial fibrillation | 2.10 | 0.91–4.86 | 0.084 |
. | HR . | 95% CI . | P-value . |
---|---|---|---|
PCI vs CABG | 2.13 | 1.05–4.31 | 0.036 |
Age | 1.07 | 1.03–1.11 | 0.001 |
Male gender | 0.73 | 0.36–1.50 | 0.390 |
SYNTAX score >32 | 0.66 | 0.30–1.48 | 0.314 |
Diabetes mellitus | 2.12 | 1.05–4.27 | 0.036 |
Atrial fibrillation | 2.10 | 0.91–4.86 | 0.084 |
CABG: coronary artery bypass grafting; CI: confidence interval; HR: hazard ratio; LMCAD: left main coronary artery disease; PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.