output from multinomial logistic regression summarizing the probability of predispersal damage type across aspect and habitat
Damage type . | Log-odds estimates (b) . | W-statistic . | Odds ratio . |
---|---|---|---|
Physical damage | |||
Foresthabitat | −0.78 | **81.1 | 0.46 [0.39, 0.55] |
NorthAspect | 0.21 | 5.9 | 1.23 [1.04, 1.45] |
Aborted seeds | |||
Foresthabitat | −0.35 | **19.2 | 0.70 [0.60, 0.82] |
NorthAspect | 0.24 | **9.3 | 1.27 [1.09, 1.48] |
Non-viable seeds | |||
Foresthabitat | 0.03 | 0.2 | 1.03 [0.88, 1.21] |
NorthAspect | 0.15 | 3.8 | 1.16 [1.00, 1.35] |
Empty seeds | |||
Foresthabitat | −1.6 | **322.8 | 0.20 [0.17, 0.24] |
NorthAspect | 0.75 | **79.83 | 2.12 [1.80, 2.50] |
Fungal damage | |||
Foresthabitat | −0.7 | **101.38 | 0.49 [0.43, 0.57] |
NorthAspect | 0.1 | 2.14 | 1.11 [0.97, 1.27] |
Damage type . | Log-odds estimates (b) . | W-statistic . | Odds ratio . |
---|---|---|---|
Physical damage | |||
Foresthabitat | −0.78 | **81.1 | 0.46 [0.39, 0.55] |
NorthAspect | 0.21 | 5.9 | 1.23 [1.04, 1.45] |
Aborted seeds | |||
Foresthabitat | −0.35 | **19.2 | 0.70 [0.60, 0.82] |
NorthAspect | 0.24 | **9.3 | 1.27 [1.09, 1.48] |
Non-viable seeds | |||
Foresthabitat | 0.03 | 0.2 | 1.03 [0.88, 1.21] |
NorthAspect | 0.15 | 3.8 | 1.16 [1.00, 1.35] |
Empty seeds | |||
Foresthabitat | −1.6 | **322.8 | 0.20 [0.17, 0.24] |
NorthAspect | 0.75 | **79.83 | 2.12 [1.80, 2.50] |
Fungal damage | |||
Foresthabitat | −0.7 | **101.38 | 0.49 [0.43, 0.57] |
NorthAspect | 0.1 | 2.14 | 1.11 [0.97, 1.27] |
The reference predispersal damage category for the analysis is ‘potential to germinate’. Treeline habitat and south-facing slopes were compared to forest habitat and north-facing slopes, resulting in the same estimates (statistical redundancy), thus they were removed from the table. The bold/italics of the Wald statistics (W), refers to significance of P <0.05, single asterisk refers to significance of P <0.01, and double asterisk refers to significance of P <0.001. The odds ratio (exp (b)) has been recorded along with the 95% confidence interval in brackets.
output from multinomial logistic regression summarizing the probability of predispersal damage type across aspect and habitat
Damage type . | Log-odds estimates (b) . | W-statistic . | Odds ratio . |
---|---|---|---|
Physical damage | |||
Foresthabitat | −0.78 | **81.1 | 0.46 [0.39, 0.55] |
NorthAspect | 0.21 | 5.9 | 1.23 [1.04, 1.45] |
Aborted seeds | |||
Foresthabitat | −0.35 | **19.2 | 0.70 [0.60, 0.82] |
NorthAspect | 0.24 | **9.3 | 1.27 [1.09, 1.48] |
Non-viable seeds | |||
Foresthabitat | 0.03 | 0.2 | 1.03 [0.88, 1.21] |
NorthAspect | 0.15 | 3.8 | 1.16 [1.00, 1.35] |
Empty seeds | |||
Foresthabitat | −1.6 | **322.8 | 0.20 [0.17, 0.24] |
NorthAspect | 0.75 | **79.83 | 2.12 [1.80, 2.50] |
Fungal damage | |||
Foresthabitat | −0.7 | **101.38 | 0.49 [0.43, 0.57] |
NorthAspect | 0.1 | 2.14 | 1.11 [0.97, 1.27] |
Damage type . | Log-odds estimates (b) . | W-statistic . | Odds ratio . |
---|---|---|---|
Physical damage | |||
Foresthabitat | −0.78 | **81.1 | 0.46 [0.39, 0.55] |
NorthAspect | 0.21 | 5.9 | 1.23 [1.04, 1.45] |
Aborted seeds | |||
Foresthabitat | −0.35 | **19.2 | 0.70 [0.60, 0.82] |
NorthAspect | 0.24 | **9.3 | 1.27 [1.09, 1.48] |
Non-viable seeds | |||
Foresthabitat | 0.03 | 0.2 | 1.03 [0.88, 1.21] |
NorthAspect | 0.15 | 3.8 | 1.16 [1.00, 1.35] |
Empty seeds | |||
Foresthabitat | −1.6 | **322.8 | 0.20 [0.17, 0.24] |
NorthAspect | 0.75 | **79.83 | 2.12 [1.80, 2.50] |
Fungal damage | |||
Foresthabitat | −0.7 | **101.38 | 0.49 [0.43, 0.57] |
NorthAspect | 0.1 | 2.14 | 1.11 [0.97, 1.27] |
The reference predispersal damage category for the analysis is ‘potential to germinate’. Treeline habitat and south-facing slopes were compared to forest habitat and north-facing slopes, resulting in the same estimates (statistical redundancy), thus they were removed from the table. The bold/italics of the Wald statistics (W), refers to significance of P <0.05, single asterisk refers to significance of P <0.01, and double asterisk refers to significance of P <0.001. The odds ratio (exp (b)) has been recorded along with the 95% confidence interval in brackets.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.