Table 4.

Regional SF-36 Scores at Baseline and After 24 Weeks of Treatment

SF-36 Domain North America/Western Europe
Placebo (n = 32) rhPTH(1-84) (n = 67)rhPTH(1-84) vs Placebo
BaselineWeek 24LS Mean Change (SE)aP ValuebBaselineWeek 24LS Mean Change (SE)aP ValuebP Valuec
PF46.4 (1.9)46.8 (2.0)0.9 (1.2)0.46149.2 (1.2)51.4 (1.1)3.0 (0.8)<0.0010.120
RP47.8 (1.9)47.5 (1.8)−1.3 (1.3)0.34947.6 (1.2)50.5 (1.1)2.1 (0.9)0.0180.030
BP48.1 (1.5)47.7 (1.9)−0.7 (1.5)0.63347.9 (1.3)51.0 (1.3)2.6 (1.0)0.0130.064
GH47.7 (2.3)48.6 (2.3)0.5 (1.2)0.67546.3 (1.5)49.0 (1.4)2.1 (0.9)0.0160.282
VT48.5 (2.1)49.2 (2.2)0.6 (1.4)0.66747.7 (1.5)52.8 (1.2)4.8 (1.0)<0.0010.013
SF48.5 (1.8)48.7 (1.9)−0.4 (1.6)0.78448.2 (1.4)50.2 (1.3)1.2 (1.1)0.2550.364
RE48.1 (2.0)49.9 (1.7)0.2 (1.3)0.90350.0 (1.2)51.1 (1.0)0.6 (0.9)0.4600.743
MH49.5 (2.0)50.6 (2.0)−0.0 (1.3)0.98850.1 (1.4)53.1 (1.2)2.2 (0.9)0.0170.147
PCS46.9 (1.6)46.6 (2.0)−0.5 (1.1)0.64047.2 (1.3)50.0 (1.1)2.7 (0.7)<0.0010.010
MCS49.5 (2.1)51.0 (1.9)0.5 (1.3)0.72349.8 (1.4)52.2 (1.2)1.7 (0.9)0.0570.404
SF-36 Domain North America/Western Europe
Placebo (n = 32) rhPTH(1-84) (n = 67)rhPTH(1-84) vs Placebo
BaselineWeek 24LS Mean Change (SE)aP ValuebBaselineWeek 24LS Mean Change (SE)aP ValuebP Valuec
PF46.4 (1.9)46.8 (2.0)0.9 (1.2)0.46149.2 (1.2)51.4 (1.1)3.0 (0.8)<0.0010.120
RP47.8 (1.9)47.5 (1.8)−1.3 (1.3)0.34947.6 (1.2)50.5 (1.1)2.1 (0.9)0.0180.030
BP48.1 (1.5)47.7 (1.9)−0.7 (1.5)0.63347.9 (1.3)51.0 (1.3)2.6 (1.0)0.0130.064
GH47.7 (2.3)48.6 (2.3)0.5 (1.2)0.67546.3 (1.5)49.0 (1.4)2.1 (0.9)0.0160.282
VT48.5 (2.1)49.2 (2.2)0.6 (1.4)0.66747.7 (1.5)52.8 (1.2)4.8 (1.0)<0.0010.013
SF48.5 (1.8)48.7 (1.9)−0.4 (1.6)0.78448.2 (1.4)50.2 (1.3)1.2 (1.1)0.2550.364
RE48.1 (2.0)49.9 (1.7)0.2 (1.3)0.90350.0 (1.2)51.1 (1.0)0.6 (0.9)0.4600.743
MH49.5 (2.0)50.6 (2.0)−0.0 (1.3)0.98850.1 (1.4)53.1 (1.2)2.2 (0.9)0.0170.147
PCS46.9 (1.6)46.6 (2.0)−0.5 (1.1)0.64047.2 (1.3)50.0 (1.1)2.7 (0.7)<0.0010.010
MCS49.5 (2.1)51.0 (1.9)0.5 (1.3)0.72349.8 (1.4)52.2 (1.2)1.7 (0.9)0.0570.404
Hungary
Placebo (n = 7) rhPTH(1-84) (n = 16)
PF42.1 (1.7)46.9 (2.3)4.5 (3.3)0.18349.4 (1.9)45.3 (2.6)−2.8 (2.3)0.2440.065
RP40.8 (2.4)45.3 (4.1)2.6 (3.1)0.41148.5 (2.5)46.7 (2.4)−2.6 (2.4)0.2900.157
BP48.1 (4.1)48.3 (4.0)0.1 (4.3)0.97349.7 (3.0)50.1 (3.4)0.6 (3.3)0.8480.914
GH41.1 (3.6)39.1 (4.2)−2.7 (2.7)0.32345.3 (2.7)46.6 (2.6)1.2 (2.0)0.5700.187
VT45.0 (4.0)53.0 (3.5)6.4 (3.5)0.08855.9 (2.5)53.8 (2.7)−0.6 (2.6)0.8130.103
SF46.6 (4.0)48.0 (4.0)1.1 (3.3)0.75251.1 (2.1)48.9 (2.7)−1.7 (2.4)0.4720.464
RE43.2 (4.1)45.7 (4.7)−0.2 (3.6)0.95647.7 (3.0)45.5 (2.9)−4.0 (2.7)0.1510.345
MH46.4 (5.1)47.9 (5.9)1.5 (2.2)0.50453.3 (2.3)51.5 (2.6)−2.2 (1.7)0.2230.148
PCS42.5 (1.5)45.2 (2.3)2.6 (2.7)0.34547.8 (2.2)46.7 (2.5)−0.1 (2.1)0.9760.378
MCS46.5 (5.1)48.9 (5.5)0.1 (3.1)0.96452.7 (2.4)50.9 (2.7)−4.1 (2.2)0.0850.254
Hungary
Placebo (n = 7) rhPTH(1-84) (n = 16)
PF42.1 (1.7)46.9 (2.3)4.5 (3.3)0.18349.4 (1.9)45.3 (2.6)−2.8 (2.3)0.2440.065
RP40.8 (2.4)45.3 (4.1)2.6 (3.1)0.41148.5 (2.5)46.7 (2.4)−2.6 (2.4)0.2900.157
BP48.1 (4.1)48.3 (4.0)0.1 (4.3)0.97349.7 (3.0)50.1 (3.4)0.6 (3.3)0.8480.914
GH41.1 (3.6)39.1 (4.2)−2.7 (2.7)0.32345.3 (2.7)46.6 (2.6)1.2 (2.0)0.5700.187
VT45.0 (4.0)53.0 (3.5)6.4 (3.5)0.08855.9 (2.5)53.8 (2.7)−0.6 (2.6)0.8130.103
SF46.6 (4.0)48.0 (4.0)1.1 (3.3)0.75251.1 (2.1)48.9 (2.7)−1.7 (2.4)0.4720.464
RE43.2 (4.1)45.7 (4.7)−0.2 (3.6)0.95647.7 (3.0)45.5 (2.9)−4.0 (2.7)0.1510.345
MH46.4 (5.1)47.9 (5.9)1.5 (2.2)0.50453.3 (2.3)51.5 (2.6)−2.2 (1.7)0.2230.148
PCS42.5 (1.5)45.2 (2.3)2.6 (2.7)0.34547.8 (2.2)46.7 (2.5)−0.1 (2.1)0.9760.378
MCS46.5 (5.1)48.9 (5.5)0.1 (3.1)0.96452.7 (2.4)50.9 (2.7)−4.1 (2.2)0.0850.254

Data given as unadjusted mean (SE) unless otherwise indicated. The analysis used an MMRM. The analyses included the fixed, categorical effects of rhPTH(1-84) treatment, sex, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction, as well as the continuous, fixed covariates of age, baseline HRQoL score, and the baseline-by-visit interaction. An unstructured covariance structure shared across treatment groups was used to model the within-patient errors. For all domains, normal population has the mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10.

Abbreviation: RE, role-emotional.

a

LS mean change is the model-based mean change from baseline to week 24.

b

Within-treatment–group P value.

c

Between-treatment–group P value.

Table 4.

Regional SF-36 Scores at Baseline and After 24 Weeks of Treatment

SF-36 Domain North America/Western Europe
Placebo (n = 32) rhPTH(1-84) (n = 67)rhPTH(1-84) vs Placebo
BaselineWeek 24LS Mean Change (SE)aP ValuebBaselineWeek 24LS Mean Change (SE)aP ValuebP Valuec
PF46.4 (1.9)46.8 (2.0)0.9 (1.2)0.46149.2 (1.2)51.4 (1.1)3.0 (0.8)<0.0010.120
RP47.8 (1.9)47.5 (1.8)−1.3 (1.3)0.34947.6 (1.2)50.5 (1.1)2.1 (0.9)0.0180.030
BP48.1 (1.5)47.7 (1.9)−0.7 (1.5)0.63347.9 (1.3)51.0 (1.3)2.6 (1.0)0.0130.064
GH47.7 (2.3)48.6 (2.3)0.5 (1.2)0.67546.3 (1.5)49.0 (1.4)2.1 (0.9)0.0160.282
VT48.5 (2.1)49.2 (2.2)0.6 (1.4)0.66747.7 (1.5)52.8 (1.2)4.8 (1.0)<0.0010.013
SF48.5 (1.8)48.7 (1.9)−0.4 (1.6)0.78448.2 (1.4)50.2 (1.3)1.2 (1.1)0.2550.364
RE48.1 (2.0)49.9 (1.7)0.2 (1.3)0.90350.0 (1.2)51.1 (1.0)0.6 (0.9)0.4600.743
MH49.5 (2.0)50.6 (2.0)−0.0 (1.3)0.98850.1 (1.4)53.1 (1.2)2.2 (0.9)0.0170.147
PCS46.9 (1.6)46.6 (2.0)−0.5 (1.1)0.64047.2 (1.3)50.0 (1.1)2.7 (0.7)<0.0010.010
MCS49.5 (2.1)51.0 (1.9)0.5 (1.3)0.72349.8 (1.4)52.2 (1.2)1.7 (0.9)0.0570.404
SF-36 Domain North America/Western Europe
Placebo (n = 32) rhPTH(1-84) (n = 67)rhPTH(1-84) vs Placebo
BaselineWeek 24LS Mean Change (SE)aP ValuebBaselineWeek 24LS Mean Change (SE)aP ValuebP Valuec
PF46.4 (1.9)46.8 (2.0)0.9 (1.2)0.46149.2 (1.2)51.4 (1.1)3.0 (0.8)<0.0010.120
RP47.8 (1.9)47.5 (1.8)−1.3 (1.3)0.34947.6 (1.2)50.5 (1.1)2.1 (0.9)0.0180.030
BP48.1 (1.5)47.7 (1.9)−0.7 (1.5)0.63347.9 (1.3)51.0 (1.3)2.6 (1.0)0.0130.064
GH47.7 (2.3)48.6 (2.3)0.5 (1.2)0.67546.3 (1.5)49.0 (1.4)2.1 (0.9)0.0160.282
VT48.5 (2.1)49.2 (2.2)0.6 (1.4)0.66747.7 (1.5)52.8 (1.2)4.8 (1.0)<0.0010.013
SF48.5 (1.8)48.7 (1.9)−0.4 (1.6)0.78448.2 (1.4)50.2 (1.3)1.2 (1.1)0.2550.364
RE48.1 (2.0)49.9 (1.7)0.2 (1.3)0.90350.0 (1.2)51.1 (1.0)0.6 (0.9)0.4600.743
MH49.5 (2.0)50.6 (2.0)−0.0 (1.3)0.98850.1 (1.4)53.1 (1.2)2.2 (0.9)0.0170.147
PCS46.9 (1.6)46.6 (2.0)−0.5 (1.1)0.64047.2 (1.3)50.0 (1.1)2.7 (0.7)<0.0010.010
MCS49.5 (2.1)51.0 (1.9)0.5 (1.3)0.72349.8 (1.4)52.2 (1.2)1.7 (0.9)0.0570.404
Hungary
Placebo (n = 7) rhPTH(1-84) (n = 16)
PF42.1 (1.7)46.9 (2.3)4.5 (3.3)0.18349.4 (1.9)45.3 (2.6)−2.8 (2.3)0.2440.065
RP40.8 (2.4)45.3 (4.1)2.6 (3.1)0.41148.5 (2.5)46.7 (2.4)−2.6 (2.4)0.2900.157
BP48.1 (4.1)48.3 (4.0)0.1 (4.3)0.97349.7 (3.0)50.1 (3.4)0.6 (3.3)0.8480.914
GH41.1 (3.6)39.1 (4.2)−2.7 (2.7)0.32345.3 (2.7)46.6 (2.6)1.2 (2.0)0.5700.187
VT45.0 (4.0)53.0 (3.5)6.4 (3.5)0.08855.9 (2.5)53.8 (2.7)−0.6 (2.6)0.8130.103
SF46.6 (4.0)48.0 (4.0)1.1 (3.3)0.75251.1 (2.1)48.9 (2.7)−1.7 (2.4)0.4720.464
RE43.2 (4.1)45.7 (4.7)−0.2 (3.6)0.95647.7 (3.0)45.5 (2.9)−4.0 (2.7)0.1510.345
MH46.4 (5.1)47.9 (5.9)1.5 (2.2)0.50453.3 (2.3)51.5 (2.6)−2.2 (1.7)0.2230.148
PCS42.5 (1.5)45.2 (2.3)2.6 (2.7)0.34547.8 (2.2)46.7 (2.5)−0.1 (2.1)0.9760.378
MCS46.5 (5.1)48.9 (5.5)0.1 (3.1)0.96452.7 (2.4)50.9 (2.7)−4.1 (2.2)0.0850.254
Hungary
Placebo (n = 7) rhPTH(1-84) (n = 16)
PF42.1 (1.7)46.9 (2.3)4.5 (3.3)0.18349.4 (1.9)45.3 (2.6)−2.8 (2.3)0.2440.065
RP40.8 (2.4)45.3 (4.1)2.6 (3.1)0.41148.5 (2.5)46.7 (2.4)−2.6 (2.4)0.2900.157
BP48.1 (4.1)48.3 (4.0)0.1 (4.3)0.97349.7 (3.0)50.1 (3.4)0.6 (3.3)0.8480.914
GH41.1 (3.6)39.1 (4.2)−2.7 (2.7)0.32345.3 (2.7)46.6 (2.6)1.2 (2.0)0.5700.187
VT45.0 (4.0)53.0 (3.5)6.4 (3.5)0.08855.9 (2.5)53.8 (2.7)−0.6 (2.6)0.8130.103
SF46.6 (4.0)48.0 (4.0)1.1 (3.3)0.75251.1 (2.1)48.9 (2.7)−1.7 (2.4)0.4720.464
RE43.2 (4.1)45.7 (4.7)−0.2 (3.6)0.95647.7 (3.0)45.5 (2.9)−4.0 (2.7)0.1510.345
MH46.4 (5.1)47.9 (5.9)1.5 (2.2)0.50453.3 (2.3)51.5 (2.6)−2.2 (1.7)0.2230.148
PCS42.5 (1.5)45.2 (2.3)2.6 (2.7)0.34547.8 (2.2)46.7 (2.5)−0.1 (2.1)0.9760.378
MCS46.5 (5.1)48.9 (5.5)0.1 (3.1)0.96452.7 (2.4)50.9 (2.7)−4.1 (2.2)0.0850.254

Data given as unadjusted mean (SE) unless otherwise indicated. The analysis used an MMRM. The analyses included the fixed, categorical effects of rhPTH(1-84) treatment, sex, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction, as well as the continuous, fixed covariates of age, baseline HRQoL score, and the baseline-by-visit interaction. An unstructured covariance structure shared across treatment groups was used to model the within-patient errors. For all domains, normal population has the mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10.

Abbreviation: RE, role-emotional.

a

LS mean change is the model-based mean change from baseline to week 24.

b

Within-treatment–group P value.

c

Between-treatment–group P value.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close