Information about fault solutions for the 2005 Mw 6.6 Fukuoka earthquake estimated by different agencies/authors. Dips and strikes are according to the parametrization in our study. Faults with dip less and more than 90° are dipping towards NE and SW, respectively. * indicates finite-fault solutions where the seismic moment is computed by summing up the slip amplitudes in each patch. |$^\#$| indicates the solutions where only the deviatoric component of the moment tensor is constrained and their scalar moment is computed from the dominant eigenvalues of the moment tensor. |$^{\#\#}$| indicates the moment tensor solution where the scalar moment is computed from the L2 norm of the eigenvalues of the moment tensor.
Solution . | Data used . | Seismic moment [N·m] . | Centroid location . | Strike . | Dip (° ) . | Rake (° ) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | . | (Moment magnitude) . | (°E, °N, km) . | (N °E) . | . | . |
GCMT | Teleseismic | 9.02 × 1018 (6.602)|$^\#$| | 130.15, 33.72, 12 | 122 | 88 | −14 |
NEIC | Teleseismic | 1.052 × 1019 (6.639)|$^{\#\#}$| | 130.131, 33.807, 10 | 125 | 117 | −16 |
NIED F-net | Local broadband | 7.8 × 1018 (6.565)|$^\#$| | 130.17, 33.74, 11 | 122 | 93 | −11 |
Ito et al. (2006) | Strong motion, | 8.4 × 1018 (6.586)|$^\#$| | 130.18, 33.74, 10 | 123 | 94 | −4.3 |
local broadband | ||||||
Nishimura et al. (2006) | InSAR, GPS | 8.7 × 1018 (6.596)* | 130.297, 33.683, 7.4 | 118 | 101 | −18 |
Asano & Iwata (2006) | Strong motion | 1.15 × 1019 (6.677)* | 130.1918, 33.7363, 8.14 | 122 | 93 | |
Takenaka et al. (2006) | Strong motion | 124 | 87 | −11 | ||
Horikawa (2006) | Strong motion | 5.7 × 1018 (6.474)* | 130.2011, 33.7210, 12 | 122 | 91 | 8 |
Kobayashi et al. (2006) | Strong motion, | 1 × 1019 (6.637)* | 130.2486, 33.7074, 6 | 123 | 92.3 | −1 |
1-Hz GPS | ||||||
Sekiguchi et al. (2006) | Strong motion | 1.16 × 1019 (6.68)* | 130.2482, 33.6985, 4 | 126 | 93 | |
Ozawa et al. (2006) | InSAR, GPS | 130.2016, 33.7264, 5 | 122 | 90 | ||
|$130.175_{-0.0102}^{+0.007}$|, | ||||||
Our solution | InSAR, GPS | |$8^{+0.6}_{-0.65}\times 10^{18}$| (|$6.568^{+0.021}_{-0.024}$|)* | |$33.7312^{+0.0071}_{-0.0035},$| | |$121.4^{+2}_{-1.95}$| | |$95_{-5.7}^{+2.8}$| | |
|$8.354_{-0.84}^{+1.23}$| |
Solution . | Data used . | Seismic moment [N·m] . | Centroid location . | Strike . | Dip (° ) . | Rake (° ) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | . | (Moment magnitude) . | (°E, °N, km) . | (N °E) . | . | . |
GCMT | Teleseismic | 9.02 × 1018 (6.602)|$^\#$| | 130.15, 33.72, 12 | 122 | 88 | −14 |
NEIC | Teleseismic | 1.052 × 1019 (6.639)|$^{\#\#}$| | 130.131, 33.807, 10 | 125 | 117 | −16 |
NIED F-net | Local broadband | 7.8 × 1018 (6.565)|$^\#$| | 130.17, 33.74, 11 | 122 | 93 | −11 |
Ito et al. (2006) | Strong motion, | 8.4 × 1018 (6.586)|$^\#$| | 130.18, 33.74, 10 | 123 | 94 | −4.3 |
local broadband | ||||||
Nishimura et al. (2006) | InSAR, GPS | 8.7 × 1018 (6.596)* | 130.297, 33.683, 7.4 | 118 | 101 | −18 |
Asano & Iwata (2006) | Strong motion | 1.15 × 1019 (6.677)* | 130.1918, 33.7363, 8.14 | 122 | 93 | |
Takenaka et al. (2006) | Strong motion | 124 | 87 | −11 | ||
Horikawa (2006) | Strong motion | 5.7 × 1018 (6.474)* | 130.2011, 33.7210, 12 | 122 | 91 | 8 |
Kobayashi et al. (2006) | Strong motion, | 1 × 1019 (6.637)* | 130.2486, 33.7074, 6 | 123 | 92.3 | −1 |
1-Hz GPS | ||||||
Sekiguchi et al. (2006) | Strong motion | 1.16 × 1019 (6.68)* | 130.2482, 33.6985, 4 | 126 | 93 | |
Ozawa et al. (2006) | InSAR, GPS | 130.2016, 33.7264, 5 | 122 | 90 | ||
|$130.175_{-0.0102}^{+0.007}$|, | ||||||
Our solution | InSAR, GPS | |$8^{+0.6}_{-0.65}\times 10^{18}$| (|$6.568^{+0.021}_{-0.024}$|)* | |$33.7312^{+0.0071}_{-0.0035},$| | |$121.4^{+2}_{-1.95}$| | |$95_{-5.7}^{+2.8}$| | |
|$8.354_{-0.84}^{+1.23}$| |
Information about fault solutions for the 2005 Mw 6.6 Fukuoka earthquake estimated by different agencies/authors. Dips and strikes are according to the parametrization in our study. Faults with dip less and more than 90° are dipping towards NE and SW, respectively. * indicates finite-fault solutions where the seismic moment is computed by summing up the slip amplitudes in each patch. |$^\#$| indicates the solutions where only the deviatoric component of the moment tensor is constrained and their scalar moment is computed from the dominant eigenvalues of the moment tensor. |$^{\#\#}$| indicates the moment tensor solution where the scalar moment is computed from the L2 norm of the eigenvalues of the moment tensor.
Solution . | Data used . | Seismic moment [N·m] . | Centroid location . | Strike . | Dip (° ) . | Rake (° ) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | . | (Moment magnitude) . | (°E, °N, km) . | (N °E) . | . | . |
GCMT | Teleseismic | 9.02 × 1018 (6.602)|$^\#$| | 130.15, 33.72, 12 | 122 | 88 | −14 |
NEIC | Teleseismic | 1.052 × 1019 (6.639)|$^{\#\#}$| | 130.131, 33.807, 10 | 125 | 117 | −16 |
NIED F-net | Local broadband | 7.8 × 1018 (6.565)|$^\#$| | 130.17, 33.74, 11 | 122 | 93 | −11 |
Ito et al. (2006) | Strong motion, | 8.4 × 1018 (6.586)|$^\#$| | 130.18, 33.74, 10 | 123 | 94 | −4.3 |
local broadband | ||||||
Nishimura et al. (2006) | InSAR, GPS | 8.7 × 1018 (6.596)* | 130.297, 33.683, 7.4 | 118 | 101 | −18 |
Asano & Iwata (2006) | Strong motion | 1.15 × 1019 (6.677)* | 130.1918, 33.7363, 8.14 | 122 | 93 | |
Takenaka et al. (2006) | Strong motion | 124 | 87 | −11 | ||
Horikawa (2006) | Strong motion | 5.7 × 1018 (6.474)* | 130.2011, 33.7210, 12 | 122 | 91 | 8 |
Kobayashi et al. (2006) | Strong motion, | 1 × 1019 (6.637)* | 130.2486, 33.7074, 6 | 123 | 92.3 | −1 |
1-Hz GPS | ||||||
Sekiguchi et al. (2006) | Strong motion | 1.16 × 1019 (6.68)* | 130.2482, 33.6985, 4 | 126 | 93 | |
Ozawa et al. (2006) | InSAR, GPS | 130.2016, 33.7264, 5 | 122 | 90 | ||
|$130.175_{-0.0102}^{+0.007}$|, | ||||||
Our solution | InSAR, GPS | |$8^{+0.6}_{-0.65}\times 10^{18}$| (|$6.568^{+0.021}_{-0.024}$|)* | |$33.7312^{+0.0071}_{-0.0035},$| | |$121.4^{+2}_{-1.95}$| | |$95_{-5.7}^{+2.8}$| | |
|$8.354_{-0.84}^{+1.23}$| |
Solution . | Data used . | Seismic moment [N·m] . | Centroid location . | Strike . | Dip (° ) . | Rake (° ) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | . | (Moment magnitude) . | (°E, °N, km) . | (N °E) . | . | . |
GCMT | Teleseismic | 9.02 × 1018 (6.602)|$^\#$| | 130.15, 33.72, 12 | 122 | 88 | −14 |
NEIC | Teleseismic | 1.052 × 1019 (6.639)|$^{\#\#}$| | 130.131, 33.807, 10 | 125 | 117 | −16 |
NIED F-net | Local broadband | 7.8 × 1018 (6.565)|$^\#$| | 130.17, 33.74, 11 | 122 | 93 | −11 |
Ito et al. (2006) | Strong motion, | 8.4 × 1018 (6.586)|$^\#$| | 130.18, 33.74, 10 | 123 | 94 | −4.3 |
local broadband | ||||||
Nishimura et al. (2006) | InSAR, GPS | 8.7 × 1018 (6.596)* | 130.297, 33.683, 7.4 | 118 | 101 | −18 |
Asano & Iwata (2006) | Strong motion | 1.15 × 1019 (6.677)* | 130.1918, 33.7363, 8.14 | 122 | 93 | |
Takenaka et al. (2006) | Strong motion | 124 | 87 | −11 | ||
Horikawa (2006) | Strong motion | 5.7 × 1018 (6.474)* | 130.2011, 33.7210, 12 | 122 | 91 | 8 |
Kobayashi et al. (2006) | Strong motion, | 1 × 1019 (6.637)* | 130.2486, 33.7074, 6 | 123 | 92.3 | −1 |
1-Hz GPS | ||||||
Sekiguchi et al. (2006) | Strong motion | 1.16 × 1019 (6.68)* | 130.2482, 33.6985, 4 | 126 | 93 | |
Ozawa et al. (2006) | InSAR, GPS | 130.2016, 33.7264, 5 | 122 | 90 | ||
|$130.175_{-0.0102}^{+0.007}$|, | ||||||
Our solution | InSAR, GPS | |$8^{+0.6}_{-0.65}\times 10^{18}$| (|$6.568^{+0.021}_{-0.024}$|)* | |$33.7312^{+0.0071}_{-0.0035},$| | |$121.4^{+2}_{-1.95}$| | |$95_{-5.7}^{+2.8}$| | |
|$8.354_{-0.84}^{+1.23}$| |
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.