Table 1. Open in new tab Simulation...

ID	η	f_bound	f_bound	f_bound	f_bound	f_bound
S0	0.0	0.982	0.909	0.120	0.111	0.110
S1	0.1	0.982	0.908	0.262	0.244	0.230
S2	0.2	0.982	0.905	0.367	0.347	0.323
S3	0.3	0.981	0.901	0.429	0.409	0.378
S4	0.4	0.981	0.894	0.479	0.454	0.419
S5	0.5	0.980	0.887	0.522	0.489	0.453
S6	0.6	0.979	0.877	0.559	0.520	0.484
S7	0.7	0.977	0.867	0.594	0.550	0.514
S8	0.8	0.975	0.858	0.631	0.580	0.543
S9	0.9	0.969	0.849	0.672	0.612	0.573
S10	1.0	0.942	0.837	0.732	0.664	0.613

ID	η	f_bound	f_bound	f_bound	f_bound	f_bound
S0	0.0	0.982	0.909	0.120	0.111	0.110
S1	0.1	0.982	0.908	0.262	0.244	0.230
S2	0.2	0.982	0.905	0.367	0.347	0.323
S3	0.3	0.981	0.901	0.429	0.409	0.378
S4	0.4	0.981	0.894	0.479	0.454	0.419
S5	0.5	0.980	0.887	0.522	0.489	0.453
S6	0.6	0.979	0.877	0.559	0.520	0.484
S7	0.7	0.977	0.867	0.594	0.550	0.514
S8	0.8	0.975	0.858	0.631	0.580	0.543
S9	0.9	0.969	0.849	0.672	0.612	0.573
S10	1.0	0.942	0.837	0.732	0.664	0.613

Table 1.

Simulation results.

ID	η	f_bound	f_bound	f_bound	f_bound	f_bound
		0.2T_r	0.4T_r	0.6T_r	0.8T_r	T_r
(1)	(2)	(3)	(4)	(5)	(6)	(7)
S0	0.0	0.982	0.909	0.120	0.111	0.110
S1	0.1	0.982	0.908	0.262	0.244	0.230
S2	0.2	0.982	0.905	0.367	0.347	0.323
S3	0.3	0.981	0.901	0.429	0.409	0.378
S4	0.4	0.981	0.894	0.479	0.454	0.419
S5	0.5	0.980	0.887	0.522	0.489	0.453
S6	0.6	0.979	0.877	0.559	0.520	0.484
S7	0.7	0.977	0.867	0.594	0.550	0.514
S8	0.8	0.975	0.858	0.631	0.580	0.543
S9	0.9	0.969	0.849	0.672	0.612	0.573
S10	1.0	0.942	0.837	0.732	0.664	0.613

ID	η	f_bound	f_bound	f_bound	f_bound	f_bound
		0.2T_r	0.4T_r	0.6T_r	0.8T_r	T_r
(1)	(2)	(3)	(4)	(5)	(6)	(7)
S0	0.0	0.982	0.909	0.120	0.111	0.110
S1	0.1	0.982	0.908	0.262	0.244	0.230
S2	0.2	0.982	0.905	0.367	0.347	0.323
S3	0.3	0.981	0.901	0.429	0.409	0.378
S4	0.4	0.981	0.894	0.479	0.454	0.419
S5	0.5	0.980	0.887	0.522	0.489	0.453
S6	0.6	0.979	0.877	0.559	0.520	0.484
S7	0.7	0.977	0.867	0.594	0.550	0.514
S8	0.8	0.975	0.858	0.631	0.580	0.543
S9	0.9	0.969	0.849	0.672	0.612	0.573
S10	1.0	0.942	0.837	0.732	0.664	0.613

Note. The bound fractions at five different epochs, t/T_r = 0.2, 0.4, ..., 1.0 (Columns 3–7), inferred from our idealized simulations of subhaloes orbiting in the fixed potential of an NFW host. Each simulation has M_h/M_s = 1000, c_h = 5, c_s = 10 and x_c = 1.0, and only differ in their value for the orbital circularity, η (Column 2). In each simulation, the subhalo, which is simulated with N = 10⁷ particles, starts out at its own apo-centre (cf. Fig. 2).

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only